Click on the image on Wikipedia; click on the button that says "more detail" under the image; the next page will show you the usage rights - whether it's public domain (can use anywhere, no attribution necessary), if you can use it but must give credit, etc. Next to the image is a list of choices, one of them is "use this file on the web". Click on that; a box will pop up: Copy and paste the info in "attribution" box and past that info into "source" for the image in your article. Notice there is also a "file url". You can use that to upload the photo in the Hubtool. The "page url" is the link back to the image if you want to include that.
Edit: The "page url" you put in the box that says "source url" in the photo capsule in the Hubtool.
Nate's instructions explain it well. However, if the photo doesn't say "Public domain", and it gives an original location (e.g. Flickr) where the photo came from, then do go to the original location to check the licence.
Wikipedia, Wikimedia etc are run by volunteers and there aren't enough of us these days. People post new photos all the time and sometimes, they don't actually have permission to do so. The volunteers try to check but too many slip through the net. So don't assume just because it's on WIkimedia that it's OK, do try to check up on it first.
That's why I like to go straight to Pixabay and Flickr, where the licences are easier to understand.
I just google whatever image that I'm looking for. If Im looking for rain storm pics, then I google "free rainstorm pics". Then, click the image tab in google chrome. When I see one that I like, I click on it then save it to my computer. I believe you can use just about any photo as long as you put the image source. That then gives the site that you got the pic from exposure. Therefore, you are helping them by sending them traffic. Hope this helps.
You are completely misinformed and giving out very bad advice. You cannot take any image you like from a Google search. Many people have been completely surprised when they receive a substantial bill for unauthorised image use. All images belong to someone. You have to make sure they are either in the Public Domain or are licensed for free use.
As TheRaggedEdge says, you are completely wrong and putting yourself at risk of prosecution.
Also you are NOT sending the original site traffic, because clicking on the photo doesn't take the reader to the original site - they have to look at the source information and click on that, which most readers won't bother to do. So you're not doing the original site any favours.
As the others have said, I'm only posting so you understand it's important.
What you are doing is WRONG and will not work. NO photos are available to be used by you unless you can specifically see where they give you permission and what sort of permission they are giving you.
Anything else is theft.
It's a bit like assuming you can browse the cake shop window items and help yourself because "they won't sell those anyway as they've been left out" .... and "I'll tell friends how great it was and they'll go to that cake shop".
Not if it's copyright, you can't. However, most old photos are in the Public Domain, but you should still make sure. Be careful with recently deceased people like Michael Jackson. You are pretty safe using anything from Wikimedia.
You still need to check rights/copyright of any image you use - else you're opening your client up to the potential of a massive lawsuit, because any legal papers would land on their desk first, before they phoned you up and said "Oi, pirate, cowboy .... what's this????"
Take a look at this poem I edited. It was originally 100% words. It was very short, and I had no pictures to emphasize it.In editing it the other day, it occurred to me to change it up a bit, and make it...
Hi, everyone! My article "7 Facts About Japan That Aren't Actually True" has got quite a lot of views already and traffic will likely increase if it gets moved to a niche site. Shortly after publishing it, I...