Is it a wise move to delete published Hubs that are not Featured?
Not unless you plan to publish them elsewhere. I would be more inclined to work on them, so that they are featured.
I have worked on an article and it has not been featured after editing it several times.
If you provide us we a copy of the link to your hub, the one that was included on the email you received, I am sure that you will get some help here to get it featured.
Try studyng your featured hubs and see how they differ from unfeatured ones. You could also look at the hubs of writers with high hubber scores and see if you can figure out "the trick of the trade." Also review HPs directives for Quality Hubs and see if that gives an idea as to why your hubs are not getting featured.
Please what is the difference between featured and published?
thank you diana harvey
A hub that is featured will appear on your profile, has been indexed by Google and thus is visible to the general public. It is also eligible to be moved to a niche site at some point. It has passed the Quality Assessment Program.
A hub that has been published is one that you can place on social networking sites to get views but is not indexed on Google and so cannot be seen by the general public. It has not passed Quality Assessment.
A featured hub appears on your profile and the public can be able to view it while published articles can not be viewed by the public, only you can view published articles.
I guess (not sure though) it affects your Hubber score. Because it has a hubscore even if rejected by the QAP.
As marketing merit says, best is to work on them and get it featured. Some Hubbers say even If not featured, Google has indexed their unfeatured hubs.
jeffzod, you can change this in your profile settings. There is a field asking whether you want only featured hubs get published or all hubs you wrote. One simple click makes the change!
It's true you can show your unFeatured Hubs on your profile (I do), but that won't do you much good, because they are still invisible to Google due to the "no follow" tag, and you won't get much traffic without Google.
Hey Jeffzod, Did the quality team (in any of the emails) give the reason to not feature that hub?
Have you removed all the links or kept some? The limit is two. You can always cite the remaining resources without linking in a capsule or a call out.
You might want to check this:
The limit is two TO THE SAME WEBSITE. So you could have 150 links in one Hub, if each link was to a different website.
Have another read of my Basic Rules Hub (you'll find it on the slider on my profile) just so you're absolutely clear of the rules.
I think that's been changed because the team recently wrote to me that they would prefer as few links as possible to outside sources because they want readers to remain on the HP site. Yes, you can have only two to the same source, but 150 to a variety of sources? I don't think so.
Thank you guys for the advice.The article was overly promotional. I have come to learn that I need to use links to other sites sparingly write quality hubs that will attract readership.
You also have to take care with Titles. I took a quick look at your profile page and saw that several of your titles were not really searchable. Just saying something like "Crock Pot Chicken" isn't going to get people to read your articles. Something enticing such as "Crock Pot Chicken Recipes That Will Make Your Mouth Water" is much more interesting. This is just an example, there are many combinations of words you can use that will enhance titles and make the more searchable.
An article also won't be featured if it is too short. Anything less than 1,000 words won't cut it. So I don't know if that might be one of your issues.
It is not normally possible for recipes to achieve a high word count.What would be your advice on writing recipes?
Don't just write a recipe. Tell a story with it that involves something interesting that led you to create the recipe. Otherwise it will just look like one you copied from somewhere...which anybody can do.
I have done a few recipe hubs and even had them moved to the niche site , delishably. My suggestion is to add more text. Write a little essay about the ingredients.
For instance, I did a hub that featured pumpkin and walnuts. I began with a capsule "10 Reasons to Love Pumpkin" and the next capsule did the same for walnuts. I did a hub about Bread Pudding and I began with a history of bread pudding. I also added recipes for suggested toppings. I think the toppings made the hub stand out from all the other recipes for bread pudding.
I have also seen hubbers introduce their recipes with a little personal story about why their family loves the dish, a little about their visit to the country known for that dish. (For instance, write a little about Spain if you recipe is for paella.) Maybe add some info on how to use the leftovers to create a new dish.
Do something to make your recipe hub unique. In marketing, the call it "added value."
I hope this helps.
Not recommendable, because it could be that the readers like your hub nevertheless. To show the not featured articles on your profile you have to check your account settings. With one click you can activate that all hubs - no matter whether featured or not - will be shown on your profile. Good luck!
It depends. You can always unpublish a hub and then edit it. After you edit it, try submitting it to be published again. If that doesn't work, I delete mine and rewrite them.
Never unpublish a Hub to edit or improve it. Always leave it published.
It's not that important if it's a new Hub - but if the Hub has been published for a while, and is Featured, then it matters.
As you know, we get most of our traffic from Google, so we need our Hubs to rank highly on the Google search results. There are several things that help improve a Hub's reputation, and one of those is the length of time it's been published.
If you unpublish a Hub for too long, Google will assume it's gone and will delete it from the results. Then when you publish it again, Google treats it as a new Hub and it starts at the bottom of the pile again.
Marisa how often does Google review the published or unpublished hubs?Will Google rank the hub highly again after it treats it like a new hub?
by Faith Reaper 5 years ago
I am just curious, all 92 hubs of mine are featured. In your opinion, should one delete (although Featured) any hubs where the score on a particular hub has eventually dropped way down from when it was initially high at one point? Or would it be better to just unpublish and later...
by qeyler 16 months ago
I've been writing here for quite a few years, I go back to the ancient era before the 'featured' 'not featured' declension.I have found that 'fixing' a Hub which is not featured is a total waste of time, as in a day or so, after a fix, it is back to unfeatured. I did an experiment and I can...
by Jemuel 5 years ago
What inspires you to write quality hubs when you know they can be unfeatured for low engagement?Making a quality content hub requires effort and dedication. With the update of Google Panda and low engagement of some hubs, which sometimes results to getting hubs unfeatured, what keeps you inspired...
by Mother of Movies and Series Reviews 16 months ago
I have finally published a hub that has been deemed unfeatured. I can only direct my attention to a table I inserted which was long when viewed on the mobile platform. Grammar is checked, titles tweaked, content is solid as its in the same vein as my other articles. Do you think this could be it?...
by Shasta Matova 3 years ago
It appears that there has been a recent change on my profile page. Underneath the number of published hubs, there is a number of featured hubs. I do not want this to be shown. My ratio of featured hubs is less than 50% of the number of published hubs. My understanding of why...
by David Livermore 5 years ago
Let me preface this by stating I am not trying to be mean or a troll. In fact, I avoid the forums because I don't want to get involved. But with so many posts about the topics I'm about to discuss, I wanted to put in my two cents and to offer a reality check to old and new hubbers...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|