That guy resorts to ad hominem against liberals... I wanna know why his mocking statement is allowed.... and I can't respond to it.
I guess it was getting too personal. Ignore the yappy dog and you will be happy
I have tried but it's like hitting your head against a brick wall.
I find it best not to respond to him, although I sometimes find the temptation too hard to resist. I can't take anything he says seriously.
The person in question does the same kind of thing to fellow Conservatives from time to time. It just may not be showing up in recent threads. It's his "forum style".
Ideally, both Liberals and Conservatives would have their (reasonable) voices heard (even if things got a little heated at times). It's too bad, though, that attempts at "legitimate discussion" so often dissolve into what they do. (I have to admit, though, there's something really entertaining about an unreasonable knock-down/drag-out. ).
Awwww Please can we? Pretty please? With sugar on top?
Its fun to get carried away
I do not agree with disrespectful attacks towards anyone, especially towards someone's character when they are attempting to respectfully present their viewpoints. While we're on the topic of ad hominem attacks, I don't think anyone can deny that they are exclusive to conservatives. Unfortunately, they are practiced by both sides on a frequent basis. I wish we could keep this out of HP all together.
How unpleasant has been your experience with him compared to sweetiepie or lita?.... his discussion tactics are primarily aimed at liberals.... unless you haven't noticed who practices it more against whom.... both sides aren't equal.
I wasn't referring to HP. More so the media. I have had many personal ad hominem attacks off of this site. It is the nature of politics. I have been written negatively about in political blogs and quoted in D.C. tabloids. So, I've had a few unpleasant experiences. But, I understand that is the nature of political debate. There is a much larger political world outside of HP. It happens everywhere. If I started receiving attacks on character on this site, of course I wouldn't like it. But, I'm used to it.
Either way, it certainly isn't right and of course I don't condone it, no matter the format and irregardless of who it is directed towards.
We agree on civil discussion format.... but politics.... we can agree to disagree.
Fair enough. And please, if you ever see me making a personal attack towards Obama or any other person that I do not agree with, call me out on it. (It'll never happen - that is just not how I operate - I'm all facts based).
You know right... "facts"/"statistics" can imply what we wanna say.
Certainly. lol I mean text from the actual legislation. That, itself, is very indisputable. That is what I base my opinions (and concerns) off of.
A "text" gonna have multiple aspects.... pick what is convenient.... supporting my view point.... and ignore the rest.... gotta leave now..... nice talking to you.... you're smart.
Well, I know I've said it before but I'm done with the politics forum here. I only get aggravation out of it
hey, look at that. You two actually know how to disagree and talk respectively. If only certain individuals on the forums in question could learn that skill. Instead they stick with the "I'm right all the time and even if you prove me wrong I won't back down and will just start making personal attacks on you" attitude.
Best to point out such things when you see them. That way all can see if there really is an ad hominem 'attack' or if someone is interpreting anything in opposition to his or her opinion as an 'attack' and/or has deliberately decided to make the discussion about him or herself.
Just came across this...
Jon, ignore the one in question if you possibly can. Too many have tried and failed to call him out (although everyone knows). Take my word for it. He's the reason, ie, some no longer are on the forums by choice.... And they won't get rid of him.
My one hub, on the spirit vs. the letter of the law is about this situation.
One of the graphic designers I work with didn't show up for to work for two days. Just because. He's still employed. ie, some get away with it, some are doubly censored. And sometimes management is blind or turns a blind eye.
I agree with much of what you say. Personally I am just not letting him bother me as he seems to enjoy asking way too many questions. I need to learn not to participate on certain threads. It seems really important for certain people to always be right, if you know what I mean, and his need really drives the inquisitions .
Thanks I'm gonna watch out.... maybe this topic also gonna be considered as "personal attack".... gotta be careful.
by crankalicious 2 months ago
Has President Trump been compromised? Does Russia have something on President Trump that would cause him to say things and create policy that favor Russia?After Helsinki, it's hard not to wonder if something is terribly wrong. Real Americans everywhere, regardless of party affiliation, should be...
by Susan Reid 4 years ago
excerpted from Liberals pride themselves on being tolerant. Are they really just suckers?"Does fear and intolerance actually work better? I find it interesting (not surprising) that research actually shows differences in the brains of liberals vs. conservatives!What do YOU think about Ms....
by Holle Abee 8 years ago
I'm honestly curious about this. How do you think democrats and liberals would respond if a movie were made in the US and distributed to US theaters about the assassination of President Obama while he was still in office?
by email@example.com 3 years ago
Why don't Hollywood liberals and liberal billionaires give their fortunes to the government ?With all the talk about paying your fair share, you'd think that the countries wealthiest and most influential liberals would at least give their fortunes to the government as an example since...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 2 years ago
What are the main issues that American Liberals and Conservatives will be further divided on as thethe decade progress? In what ways will liberalism and progressivism become more prevalent in America as the 21st century progresses? As the century progresses, will American Liberals...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 5 years ago
SOME REPUBLICANS AND CONSERVATIVES AND VICE VERSA?In the book GENERATIONS: THE HISTORY OF AMERICA'S FUTURE, 1584 TO 2069 by authors William Strauss and Neil Howe, it predicted that there would be growing schism and verbal war between liberal and conservative factions in America from the...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|