Why is HubPages considered a "sketchy" website?
I recently read a B2C (Business 2 Community) article that considered HubPages to be a sketchy website. The article also listed Wikipedia and eHow as websites that you should not link your website to or you would suffer the consequence of being downgraded for linking to one of these sketchy websites.
Wow, hope that is not the case. Yikes, on the Wikipedia, etc. too. I did have one incident that really kind of stunned me back a month or so ago, concerning logging into my HP account, and I believe, if I remember correctly, a message from my Internet provider came up, saying "Do you really want to log into this site, as it is risky to do so," or something of that nature. I thought, what in the world, and it kept giving me that message for a couple of days, and so I finally just said, "yes," the site it okay, so it would allow me to log on. I don't know why it would be considered "sketchy," but would like to know.
I'm extremely surprised that this may be the case with Wikipedia considering it's basically an online encyclopaedia which requires citations, verification, etc in order to have content added. That strikes me as odd. I'm not surprised about Hubpages because basically just anybody can sign up and post anything they want.
Thanks. I'm starting to see some logic. Wikipedia encourages citations and verifications, but it is not a requirement. People can still post to Wiki, but then their post would have a notice regarding the absence of citations.
Yes that's true, though sometimes though do remove content if they find it to be inaccurate.
Well look, I know that in the past professors at universities the world over didn't like students citing Wikipedia articles. But I think that attitude is changing. I know for a fact that some students have even been given assignments to create Wikipedia articles on a subject of their choosing.
HubPages and eHow are often branded as content farms, perhaps wrongly -- especially in the case of HubPages. HubPages strives for high quality content, which I think alone makes it different from content farms, which are by definition websites with low quality content.
In the end someone might have heard the website was bad, didn't bother looking in to it in order to form their own opinion, and just went along with so-and-so says it's a sketchy website, and people climb on the bandwagon. You'd be surprised how often this happens.
Oh, good point, Anti-Valentine, good point. We can't believe everything we read on the internet. After reading that article, I was quite curious. I wondered if I was missing something. Couldn't see why HP would be put in the sketchy class. Thanks.
I personally don't think HubPages is a bad website -- or Wikipedia for that matter. That's my opinion.
I agree that it is probably just rumored to be sketchy and people are buying into because they haven't experienced it firsthand. I've been online a long time, and HubPages is one of the least sketchy places I know!
Very interesting points there, Anti-Valentine. Hmmm, must go for a visit on your corner of HP Town.
I think some of the brouhaha deals with how Google may rank some content on the site. But let's look at this. HP has an Alexa.com rank of 460. That means it's in the top 500 trafficked websites in the world. It has a Google Page Rank of 6 out of 10 which is pretty good considering it's not an "authority" site (for example NY Times is a 9, WSJ is an 8).
Essentially HP is a site of "sites." This is like saying that WordPress is bad because there are horrific bad WP bloggers. Does anyone say WP is "sketchy?"
I view HP as another "platform" for content distribution, not a site itself.
Wow, great to know. Thanks a lot for the great information.
Now, I'm more impressed than ever. I did not realize how highly HP ranked among other websites. But, like you said, it is more of a platform than a regular website.
I am going to guess that it's because hubpage authors are not required to show credentials in order to write something, and our articles are not vetted by industry professionals in the area in which we write. We may indeed be very knowledgeable about our topics, but the vetting process is not intense. That being said, our google rank is a lot higher than a lot of other social media platforms.
by DasEngel 3 years ago
No one takes the Internet seriously. Neither do I. I'm doing a quick poll. Just give me a rough numerical idea how often, in a normal day, do you open up a Wikipedia article to read. Either for pleasure or for necessity. Or for both.Thanks
by Paul Edmondson 3 years ago
I really like what Russ has to say.https://moz.com/blog/million-dollar-contentIf nothing else, jump to #3.
by Ghaaz B 4 years ago
I'm wondering if, while making an info-heavy blog, linking to sites like Wikipedia and, more specifically, chemwiki.ucdavis.edu, will negatively effect my Hubscore/GoogleLove? I'm inclined to think it would be a good thing, but I just want to be sure.Thanks in advance!
by FootballNut 3 years ago
I was wondering if Hubpages offer a revenue sharing HTML code that can be implemented into the hubpages members own websites.The Hubpages Ad programme seems to work better than google adsense in respect of how much can be earned per 1000 page views, I would much rather have hubpages adverts being...
by GoldenBird 7 years ago
SOPA and PIPA are two proposed laws that will enable copyright holders to accuse websites which hosts pirated content. Wikipedia, in protest, will blackout English Wikipedia for 24 hours. Should Internet be free and open worldwide?
by ahorseback 3 years ago
I have over a thousand hubs , mostly poetry , around six years on Hub pages , over five hundred more as yet unfinished and unpublished hubs , a score in the mid forties , Not now or never signed up for adsense or whatever the money thing is . ...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|