No one takes the Internet seriously. Neither do I. I'm doing a quick poll. Just give me a rough numerical idea how often, in a normal day, do you open up a Wikipedia article to read. Either for pleasure or for necessity. Or for both.
Once or twice a week, maybe?
I do take the internet seriously though, why wouldn't I? Have been earning off it for donkey's years.
Everyday, even though I do not necessarily read a complete article. I like the links and citations when skimming for information. It is a good resource, yet not necessarily a go-to source.
Do you check the links and citations for the links and citations that Wikipedia offers?
For example: If a Wikipedia user links to a BBC World article as a reference, do you check if that BBC World article has any links and citations at the end of their article?
In other words, do you check the origin of origins?
Yes I do, though it is guided with my purpose. I explore while most usually it is not for a venture with 'online' writing with its pathway. Online writing is unique. Many times it is simply curiosity.
Continuing seeking additional support such as citations will be governed by when that curiosity has been met. And, sometimes using essay format I start a paper, write a paper, or simply do a journal entry. I like the 'Finding Forrester' approach to writing.
I would say I visit Wikipedia once a day. I do spend most of my day online so this is part of the reason. I don't think I would boot up just to go to Wikipedia.
Probably once or twice a month . . . Meaning barely.
Yea, a couple of times a week here too. As a matter of fact I was just checking wiki on my phone a little while ago because a long-forgotten celebrity's name came up in conversation and we wanted to find out if he was dead or still alive.
Always. Wikipedia is the first spot I go to for scientific terms and learning.
Wikipedia articles are cr-p. But I (personally) need them. And I need the Wikimedia Commons' pictures as well.
Some hubs on HubPages are just cr-p. Some hubs, holy God they've changed my life! I need HubPages. :-)
At least Wikipedia articles give you a light understanding. You can always use Google search for more info (finding more appropriate sites), right?
About once a week, normally as a jumping off point on a subject that I know nothing about. On subject I am familiar with I find Wikipedia to be more hit than miss, and they provide citations you can follow up on to find more.
A couple of times a week. If it's just checking up on a celebrity, then that's as far as I'll go. If it's a serious subject of any kind, then I usually won't 100% trust the Wikipedia article and will spend time researching on other sites as well.
I used to think Wikipedia was great, until it occurred to me to read the entries on subjects I actually knew something about - and I was so shocked at how inaccurate they were, I've never trusted the site again. I am a member there and do try to fix mistakes when I notice them.
You should not outright mindlessly trust any singe source. Old paper encyclopedias and first year textbooks are also wildly inaccurate in places. People just used to lack the tools to discover the errors.
Honestly - I don't trust anything I read on the Internet, unless it is verified by several reliable sources. Wiki is a source, but not my go to. I look at it once every 2 weeks. However, Google always thrusts it in my face.
Several times a day.
In fact, in the past ten years I've probably made over 10,000 edits on Wikipedia. Mostly on the English site, but in quite a few others. I've created more than a dozen articles. A lot of my edits are vandalism removal or simple rewrites, but a good 3-10% are substantial article contributions.
I write informational articles that require a lot of research. I very, very rarely use Wikipedia as a direct information source. But I consult it almost daily for basic information when I'm beginning my research, or just to satisfy casual curiosity on some topic. Rather than quote Wikipedia, I use their references to track down original sources. Also, it's often a good source for legally usable images. All in all, I don't consider Wikipedia authoritative, but it's often quite valuable.
I look at Wikipedia often for current events of interest. They seem to avoid telling us how to interpret the news and stick to presenting the 'facts' as they have been offered by reporting sources.
They are NOT just another opinionated news outlet, and that makes them better than other sources in may cases.
I often read Wikipedia articles but what I like most about them are the source and citation links. I tend to read scientific papers more but if the subject is one I'm not familiar with, I use Wikipedia as a jumping off point to find studies and papers to start with.
Almost daily. I use it to get a general sense of just abut any subject. While not a definitive authority, it os a great resource.
I come across a Wikipedia article more often now especially using G search. I actually read them more than 5 a week .
by Paul Edmondson 5 years ago
I really like what Russ has to say.https://moz.com/blog/million-dollar-contentIf nothing else, jump to #3.
by Marlene Bertrand 8 years ago
Why is HubPages considered a "sketchy" website?I recently read a B2C (Business 2 Community) article that considered HubPages to be a sketchy website. The article also listed Wikipedia and eHow as websites that you should not link your website to or you would suffer the consequence of...
by Jason Menayan 12 years ago
Hi all,We'd like to see if there is any interest among Hubbers to create a Wikipedia article on HubPages. We can not author the article on our own, as that presents a conflict of interest according to Wikipedia's rules, nor can we compensate any of you to write anything, since that would be another...
by Ghaaz B 6 years ago
I'm wondering if, while making an info-heavy blog, linking to sites like Wikipedia and, more specifically, chemwiki.ucdavis.edu, will negatively effect my Hubscore/GoogleLove? I'm inclined to think it would be a good thing, but I just want to be sure.Thanks in advance!
by Tanmoy Acharya 100 2 weeks ago
I think most hubbers are really shy to comment on others' work. They like to read hubs (through the HubPages news~feed), but when it comes to leaving an insightful comment [which most can, if they try a bit], they are really shy.Why is this trend? What is the point of joining this website, if are...
by Kathy Henderson 3 weeks ago
I have been weary as of late, battling the Covid comeback and such. However, I have attempted to write an article or two. Although my interaction limits currently because of health. The latest, https://discover.hubpages.com/religion- … rent-Days, is on Discover (so confused), but it is still...
Copyright © 2021 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|