How are hubs selected for HubPro?
I noticed someone getting selected for hubpro even though their articles only contain one photo each that aren't sourced, no separation in text, and no polls, maps, or videos. I thought HubPro was for hubs that actually were mostly developed according to HP standards. Is Hubpro for hubs that don't meet any of the quality standards? Are there any requirements at all for HubPro? I'm a bit disappointed since I thought this was something to help hubbers who were already helping themselves.
My understanding was they were targeting hubs that already get a lot of traffic for improvements. The mindset being if they improve those, the reader experience scores will improve and suddenly Google will start loving HP again.
This doesn't seem to make that much sense to me, because you would think they would pick "moderate" traffic hubs and try to improve those and would work even more on removing the garbage over improving what already works. I don't know. I think the HubPro thing could work long term, but I think it was maybe not planned out all that well and they are kind of throwing things at the wall to see what sticks. What else can you do though when Google is so fickle?
I haven't had any chosen and I honestly don't really care. A lot of the things that seem to get favorited here are questionable in my eyes - like the military diet thing or whatever that one was. So much nonsense, but it's popular!
I understand your confusion as that choice doesn't make sense to me either, unless they think the subject will get a lot of traffic, but don't want the user experience to be diminished because the hub looks like crap. That would be my take on it, but who knows?
I honestly wish they would direct more attention to gaining traffic that doesn't revolve around Google and I hope I see them do more of that in the future. HubPro could probably help with that too, as hubs that are engaging and well designed will be more likely to be shared.
None of mine picked either, but I really had hope they would at least stick to helping articles that were already at least decent in how they already are. Maybe you're right about it being a good topic and them not wanting better experience for view
HubPro is focused on the highest trafficked Hubs because we want to improve the reading experience for the most readers as possible. So far, 30% of views have been through HubPro. At about 6,000 Hubs, that will account for around 60% of Hub views.
The average reader is much more satisfied than they used to be with HubPages. This should benefit all Hubbers over time. Not only are readers more satisfied, we've found that Hubs that get HubPro see significant traffic gains over time from search and social.
We are working on ways to bring editing benefits to more Hubbers. We've found that copy editing can be a pretty significant at increasing traffic. Most Hubbers can do this on their own and get a lot of benefit.
This contradicts what the person claiming it has. That user doesn't even have 10,000 total views on all their articles. Maybe, hopefully, they were lying. I love the hubpro concept, just don't like the idea of lazy writers getting it. Thanks!
I'm not sure what/who is claiming what, but it's a pretty limited in the number of Hubbers that get HubPro services now.
A hubber with fewer than 10,000 overall is unlikely to have any hubs chosen for HubPro since they are starting at the top views per hub and going down. Since many have individual hubs with more views that haven't been chosen, the claim seems fishy.
That's exactly the type of hub that needs editing. I think it's based strictly on the number of views the hubs get. If an embarrassing hub is getting lots of views it makes sense to fix it up so people don't get the idea that HubPages is only crap.
I think those people should be using the things that are already in place to build their articles. Something that is suppose to be so great for the hubber should be reserved for people already using what is available on here. JMO.
It's image management. HubPages is trying to get rid of a reputation for being full of crap articles.
I'd argue that hubs like that shouldn't pass the QAP in the first place and that editing should be reserved for those who make more of an effort.
It's not about benefits to the authors, but about making sure the hubs that get the most views do not reflect badly on HubPages. HP also cannot afford to lose high traffic hubs, so they're stepping in to fix them instead of un-publishing them.
I understand that point as well. I suspect someone with 10k views didn't get picked, but if they did, that's a bit unfair to those with hubs with much higher traffic.
by Aman Ullah Ghazi 8 months ago
Need detailed and honest explaination.
by Cholee Clay 5 months ago
I'm curious if anyone knows if the new editors that were hired have completed the training and are on their own now, or if article standards have changed for some reason? The last few months I've had some very old and not updated articles moved to niche sites. I'm happy more of my articles are...
by Jack Lee 2 years ago
Just curious about what other hubbers have experienced so far.For me, I currently have 162 featured hubs of which only 2 have been chosen for niches.That is just slightly over 1%.
by Tessa Schlesinger 3 years ago
I've just sent some hours reading the feedback on hubpro editors as I received an email saying that I had been selected for hubpro. I also read the blurb of one of the editors that had been posted to the thread. Lady doesn't have correct flow, and I would be very hesitant to have anyone who writes...
by Eric Dierker 4 years ago
Hubpages needs to make some effort to be inclusive of short thought provoking hubs.I have been visiting Bubblews and Zurcker and find one factor that is interesting and in keeping what I see as a reality. Many people have really short attention spans -- Twitter and Facebook bear this out. My...
by herrypaul 2 years ago
I have been a Hubber for 14 month, but I started to write Hubs about 3 to 4 month ago; my pageviews are 3200 more. I have written 12 Hubs so far; it's not easy to write them -I must think hard...very hard. And I do not know how The TeamHubpages views my Hubs: I do not know how Google Ads reviews my...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|