I had heard pipes - this thing - | - are bad in a title. So much so that when editing an old hub, I could not save it unless I removed the pipe from the original title.
Noticing that an old title on my blog had a pipe it it, but it was still getting good viewership, I did a little experiment with pipes over there last October. In a series of 6 articles, I put pipes into 2 of the titles in that series. Those two articles are now number 3-5 best performing articles out of 55.
In fact, when I just performed 3 random searches for dog brushes/hardwood floor brushes etc... several articles on page 1 came up with pipes in their titles, in each search.
So I am curious, from where does this wisdom regarding pipes emanate? How many other things are we blindly following because someone suggested something and it was taking as gospel?
I've experienced the same thing, and I've never agreed with this notion that you shouldn't use pipes. There is good evidence that it is actually an advantage to use pipes. This is why I take most of the advice out there, especially on these forums, with a grain of salt.
Seems to me there was a time when pipes were recommended, otherwise, I 'd have never looked for them on my keyboard. Marissa is correct; they are a mortal sin, but I can't see why.
Some of the smartest writers here were thinking maybe pipes were a good idea back here https://hubpages.com/community/forum/12 … -hub-title
One of the links on that threads no longer goes to the original article, but the article essentially talked about how Google judges a title according the first word as strongest, but when using pipes they essentially start all over and the new section starts just as strong. Which I don't see as wrong as long as both sections are relevant.
Hi Nate: I remember that discussion from so long ago! That got me thinking about titles again, and I updated a couple of older hub titles that had fallen out of favor.
I came across this article, where he still recommends the use of pipes. I don't know what his street cred is, but he did come up on page 1.
http://www.code7.co.uk/blog/how-to-writ … scriptions
Yeah, that thread was a bit of an eye opener for me, as far as how Google reads titles and how to structure a title.
The advice overall in that article is sound. I notice he also mentioned the stronger keyword being the first one in the title. He also "brands" in the way lobobrandon has mentioned in this thread. The titles he uses as good examples might be frowned upon, I'm not sure. They bear a resemblance to lobobrandon's example of a title that would get penalized. But I'm just saying I'm not sure.
Also it was interesting that Google is rearranging titles, to put the brand first. He said it does not affect ranking, but Google is putting some kind of emphasis on brands for the buyer/searcher. Interesting.
Would that put new websites at a disadvantage, if they don't have a Google approved brand?
From experience, I would say the first two of these examples on that website are bad and the second two are fine
Chocolate Gifts | Artisan Truffles | Gourmet Chocolate
Football stats | Team stats | Player stats | Soccer stats
Five ways to pay less tax | Tips on debt and credit
Upright | Handheld | Wet & Dry Vacuum Cleaners
Because the second two are not repeating stuff. I would personally only go for the third option if I were to do something like this, but definitely NOT the second one. Football stats, soccer stats is the same thing. I'm sure it's not American football and European football (soccer) that are both presented on that page. He's keyword stuffing putting in synonyms in the title, Google is smart enough to know these are synonyms and you'd show up without this, this may, in fact, penalize you a bit.
That's interesting. It seems to me using synonyms in the body of an article is wise, because of Semantic Search but it takes on keyword stuffing if all put into a title. Makes sense.
I remember them being the recommended option at one time, with lots of SEO gurus advising us to use them.
https://moz.com/community/q/title-tag-u … e-or-colon
At some point, I remember Paul (or somebody) saying that Google didn't like pipes any more - perhaps they had been overused.
That's interesting, Solaras. I remember that happening maybe a year and a half, 2 years ago. I took all my pipes out but can't recall the reason. Can't find a forum either.
I remember once that it was said we could not use dashes in titles (which I had done a few times but that pipes were OK. I went through and substituted pipes for dashes-- and at that time I had never heard of pipes.
Then recently while editing, as happened to Solaras, I needed to delete the pipes to publish.
This always happens. Something starts out as a guideline ("we've observed that titles without pipes do better") and eventually gets exaggerated until it's a mortal sin.
It's exactly the same as Amazon capsules. The advice that they must be relevant to the context and include some info about the product has morphed into, "the product must be directly related to the main subject and you must have personal experience of it".
Pipes are slightly frowned on by Google. If an article is otherwise good enough, then having pipes in the title isn't going to stop it ranking.
Unfortunately whether you like them or not , you can't save the Hub if you have a Pipe in the title! I would prefer to have the option to use or not use
True, here on HP, they are not allowed anymore. I had to remove them in some of my articles while editing recently, as HP did not feature after the editing. In one case, the HP team themselves cropped it and sent me the message about tweaking it.
That's true. I couldn't publish until I removed a pipe.
Speaking of that, if I wrote a hub about plumbing, could I use pipes? :-)
This is the problem when people follow advice blindly. It is important to read the entire article of the guy who points such stuff out. It is possible that the Google algorithm changes and what it may like tomorrow is what it hates today. But that is not the case with pipes.
What was frowned upon was the fact that people were separating keywords in their titles using pipes such as: Dog care tips | Puppy care | Looking after a dog
This title above ^ is still going to get you penalized.
The reason HP does not allow pipes is because they have by default the niche site name following your title. For instance my hub: Watering Tomatoes: When & How - 5 Pro Tips | Dengarden
It would look bad on search if it were: Watering Tomatoes: When & How | 5 Pro Tips | Dengarden
And some people here would use pipes to put in keywords. Like the bad dog example above. HP is right in not allowing pipes because, they by default use one in every title. Go ahead and use them on your blog where you see fit, I use them on my website in the same way HP uses them. Branding is important to me, that's why I use my brand name at the end of each title. If branding is not important you don't need to mention the site name. Take away Dengarden from the title and you could use one more pipe wiithout it looking spammy.
Lobrandon what I have found is that if I have a pipe in a title and do an edit on the Hub regardless of whether we want one or not the Hub tool will not allow us to 'Done Editing' I am getting this warning:
Please fix these errors before continuing:
Title may not contain the pipe character.
@brandon, thank you for taking time to explain everything that we need to know about why the use of pipes was discouraged. It shows that you're very knowledgeable and well-informed when it comes to SEO.
by Daniel Mollat3 weeks ago
Could I please ask the HP community to please give me a list of your own articles titles that are doing well in bringing in traffic?I would greatly appreciate it if each respondent could give me about 3-5 articles...
by Dr Mark4 weeks ago
Do the titles of your article tell the reader what is in it, but do not encourage a reader to click to read more? In the past I have read that titles should be simple but it now appears that titles should tell the...
by Vic Dillinger2 years ago
I'm relatively new to this site.I know most sites of its type do their best to be "Google friendly" which translates into "family friendly" (a phrase I hate, by the way). Over the years when...
by Bethany Halbert3 weeks ago
Hi Hubpages Community!I started my account last Fall because I like to write and I also hope to earn a little extra income. So far I've written 12 hubs, and all of them have been selected for niche sites but I'm still...
by Anita Hasch9 months ago
I hope somebody can help. I now have 49 hubs, and yet not one of them are seen by the search engines. When I click on their stats, it says under 'search phrases,' no search terms to add.(list of words that appear...
by Susannah Birch3 years ago
A year or two ago, I posted a thread where I offered to give feedback on hubs and how to improve them. I then went on to write a post based on the most common mistakes I saw people making (you can read it on the slider...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.