I have recently been on overdrive with making changes to my articles. I am doing a lot of experiments with changing titles, changing headings within the articles, amazon affiliate capsules/link changes etc. Basically just doing experiments and waiting to see if traffic improves and/or amazon sales improve etc.
My question is this: Every time I make even the slightest change my article goes back into a queue where the editors need to review it again and approve it to stay on the niche sites (or remain featured) again. I am making A LOT of changes and some are VERY minor. Am I going to become a total nuisance to these editors if each time I change the wording of a heading to see how it affects traffic, they have to read my whole article again and approve it again?
I am really just trying to step up my game here at HubPages and these experiments are helping me determine what works and what doesn't. I don't want to be an absolute nightmare to the editors in the mean time...
I know that it is encouraged to keep hubs fresh and updated so I doubt you are being a nuisance. Just my 1.5 cents worth
As others have pointed out, this doesn't bother us at all, and we encourage you to make changes that make your articles better. We do have to check after edits to ensure authors aren't adding spammy links or changing them so that they no longer follow network site rules, but it's our job and we're happy to do it. We also know that the majority of authors are indeed making the content better with their changes, and we love seeing that, even if it's just fixing a typo.
Thank you for replying Christy! I just hate filling your que for something simple like a title wording change. Or moving an amazon affiliate link from the bottom to the middle of the page etc.
When we edit an article do you get a summary of the changes we made (like what we get when the editors make a change to our articles) or do you get the whole article and have to read through it all word for word again? I hope that's not the case!
We do have the changes highlighted for us. Not to worry, reviewing author changes is a quick and simple process.
Nope. I have been doing this for years and the results have always been positive. In fact, I submitted a relatively new article this morning and tonight it was moved to a niche site! Not the first time this has happened, so I don't think anybody "up there" is irritated!
I do this all of the time too. Whenever I have a fresh piece of info that I think can help my readers, have a title that I think will gain more page views, or just want to change things around, I go ahead and do it. I had the same thought you did and asked the person who edits my articles on Pethelpful. She said that they think it is great. More edits and positive changes are going to lead to more page views, and when the page is viewed more HP also earns more.
So Wolfy, even it is a minor thing, go for it.
I have been doing the same thing. After my reworking the articles, most of them get snipped. One was unfeatured, and it took five edits to get it back to feature.
My guess is that they can see what the changes are, and decide based on that how much time to spend checking? I doubt they read every word, every time.
I've sometimes just corrected one typo and get an email saying an article has been reviewed- which seems a bit overboard, but its their process.
I don't think you should feel bad about it.
No, they won't be upset! I change my titles, captions, etc. just as you're saying every few days, going through and tweaking, adjusting, staying relevant. They want you to do it
When an editor makes a change we get to see the before and after images of the article. I am sure they (the editors) can also see exactly what you have changed. So hitting the approve button should be quick as they probably only have to check the parts you've altered. I make changes and conduct experiments too. It's necessary and also important that you do this, imo.
by Cholee Clay 12 months ago
I have an article that an editor has made substantial changes too. Including adding a bio that they wrote themselves. I have not seen an edit this bad in quite some time on one of my articles, and I do not want to go through the whole article and rewrite half of it. I've already spent countless...
by Carola Finch 9 months ago
One of my articles on an HP niche site recently underwent the Premium Pro editing process. The editor decided to add about 800 words of her own research to supposedly "improve" my article. Personally, I hated the addition. I do not feel comfortable including other...
by Eric Dockett 14 months ago
So apparently an editor decided to go berserk on seven of my Hubs today, but I did not receive a single email notifying me of the many changes they made. The only way I noticed was by looking at my account and seeing the little red notices next to each Hub. Why no notification?The editor also...
by Sondra Rochelle 3 weeks ago
A number of writers here have been seeing numerous mistakes on edits, so I thought it would be a good idea for us to post them individually to remind editors that although we appreciate their efforts, they should make sure they are correct before initiating changes on articles.I'll start. ...
by And Drewson 8 years ago
Here's an interesting message from Seekyt, which mentions Hub Pages fondly."Important DecisionMake sure you've read the news to the right before reading this paragraph. ---->There is always a way to get around these things; however, do we really want to "get around it" and try to...
by Scott S Bateman 4 months ago
I have been pleased with the audience and revenue for my articles on HubPages since joining the site some years ago.I commend the company for creating the successful niche sites at a time when similar sites were folding. My existing articles that moved to those sites have done even better than...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|