Something strange is going on. I have a hub that's been doing really well for years. It was hub-pro edited a couple of months ago and traffic increased by a couple hundred a day. Over the last week or so it's hovered around 750 per day. Overall it has almost half a million views.
Today, views are already down by two thirds and it's not appearing in the search results of any search engine. Usually when I type the keywords or the title it's the top result.
I've perfunctorily checked for copies, but can't find anything.
Why would it suddenly not appear in search results? Not Google, not Start Page, not DDG, not Bing.
Thanks for bringing this up. The same thing happened to one of my articles. It was receiving close to 300 views per day consistently on HowTheyPlay and suddenly dropped to 13.
I tried copying and pasting the URL into google and like yours, it seems to have disappeared. I don't know what the problem is but it doesn't look good. I hope Hubpages staff look into this.
After reading all of the posts here I have a terrible feeling that Google has had another update. In 2014, overnight, I lost my entire site...page views dropped from many thousands of views down to almost nothing. Took me almost a year to get things going again AND I never found out what happened.! There were no warnings from Google, etc. I hope to God HP has not been penalized for some reason. Will be anxious to hear what the team has to say about this.
No penalty for sure, and no update from what I am seeing. I just checked some facebook groups and stats on a few client sites to see if anything is out of the ordinary. Things are stable and quiet on this front. Searchengineland has no post about anything of this kind either.
If it were a penalty of any kind (even if it were a manual penalty), the entire domain would be hit not just one or two pages.
It sounds like it has a noindex tag on it all of a sudden. You can check by right clicking the page (in Chrome) and choosing View Page Source. Then, control+F search for noindex.
You can also check to make sure it is really gone from Google by copy/pasting the full url into the browser search field (not address field).
I apologize if you already know this stuff. These are the first things I'd do.
As far as I know, the only Hubs that should be excluded from indexing are the unfeatured, or those that failed QAP, which obviously isn't yours.
Maybe there is a problem with the site map for the niche site or something. Hopefully HP staff will notice this and figure it out. Pages suddenly falling out of the SERPs for no reason is not a good thing.
Back when we had subdomains it was easy to check to make sure all of our Hubs were indexed, but I have no idea how to do that with our Hubs spread all over a bunch of sites.
Thanks so much, Eric, going to check those things right now.
Okay, no, putting the URL in the search field only brings up the network site and subsection of it. No actual article. That's not good.
There's no 'noindex' in the source code. So that's good, yes?
How could it just disappear like that? I can see it on the front page of its subsection on the niche site.
Definitely good that there's no noindex. There absolutely shouldn't be. But definitely bad that it fell out of the SERPs somehow.
I don't know how that would happen, unless maybe there are crawl issues with the niche site or a messed up sitemap or something.
Whatever is going on, this is something I'd think HP would be greatly concerned about. If a Hub that gets 750 views per day can vanish from the SERPs for no reason, who knows what else is gone.
Okay will send a link to this thread to the team. Thanks for your help. x
Thanks Bev for raising this issue. I've just checked one of mine where the views have fallen off suddenly ... and it also has disappeared from the search results.
At the bottom of the search results it said
"In order to show you the most relevant results, we have omitted some entries very similar to the 10 already displayed. If you like, you can repeat the search with the omitted results included."
So I repeated the search to include omitted results and my article appeared in position number 5. Above it and below it are articles from the same niche site, so maybe Google is limiting the number of articles appearing in search results from the same site.
Okay, here's another weird thing... I typed in my title preceded by Turbofuture. One of my questions appeared second in the results. When I clicked on it, there was the whole article.
The urls for questions that have moved back to the articles redirect to the full article. So it's possible the question url was still indexed even though it has been moved and clicking the result sent you to the article.
Just noticed one of mine is doing something similar. It was getting about 500 views daily all year and now just 150. Views started to fall on Tuesday. It was near the top of the list on the the first page of SERPs, but now nowhere to be found.
Some of my articles have fallen through. I haven't checked Google serps but the daily view count indicates it.
Is there another Google update?
Had an email from the team saying it's visible in SE now. And it is. Traffic down to 171 now though. Let's hope it improves tomorrow.
Great. Hope your traffic gets back to what it used to be. Also received a similar email from HP team but the strange thing is my article is still invisible in Google's search engine at my end. Hope maybe it appears tomorrow.
Keeping my fingers crossed that everyone's hubs come back to normal. I expect there are far more affected than just us who have posted here.
Strange it was just one, wasn't it?
Yeah, only one of my articles was affected which strangely happen to be one of my top articles.
Good you started this thread. I saw it drop drastically in views yesterday but didn't bother to check if it was still visible in search engine results.
This might help explain the causes for the drop, which includes bad links and updates:
https://cognitiveseo.com/blog/4644/6-go … with-them/
Hope everything smooths out and your views are restored. Meanwhile, keep us all up to date please.
Just got back from a weeks conference, 1:30 AM, but saw this thread and had to reply. I did a quick check and I don't see many changes on the SERPs. So it's not a new major update that rolled out, I only checked this for now and nothing more: https://www.rankranger.com/rank-risk-index
Did the team tell you what was wrong? Over the past 24 hours I got PLENTY of emails from loads of my client sites they Google has now switched to Mobile first indexing. This began a few months ago and was slowly released (can't think of a better word right now) across all websites. The past 24 hours was the final shot in my opinion, 90% of my client sites that were not on mobile first indexing are now (over the past 24 hours) on that bandwagon.
That's the only reason I could think of that caused this fluctuation is this. But this should technically not be a problem.
Also, in response to Eric, having a broken sitemap does not affect a website. Sitemaps just allow you to help Google manage the bandwidth they spend on a site. Once the page was indexed and readily available (a regular dofollow link) from other pages that are indexed, it should not get deindexed.
I wonder whether the others who commented here had the same issue. I didn't notice anyone say that they entered the URL into Google. On entering the title, Google would tell you that certain results are hidden ...
DId the team give you an explanation of any kind?
I pasted the url into the search box. The hub didn't come up in the results of any search engine I tried. I pasted in portions of text, subtitles, search terms: nothing.
No the team didn't give an explanation they just said it's there now. Which it is, although the snippet is from way down text.
Traffic is up by a few tens, but nothing like it was before. 233/750.
I wonder if it's due to keyword cannibalisation.
When you have several pages with similar keywords on the same site google will choose one to display (and it's not always the one you want!).
From what you've said it sounds like G is favouring the Q and A page rather than the actual article?
Brandon can check this out if he has time - does HP use canonical urls to avoid this canibalisation?
On questions, they don't use canonicals but redirects instead. The questions that are not redirected, stand on their own.
But when it comes to keyword cannibalization Google indexes both pages, just that the ranking of both is not the best. The only time Google does not index a page is if there is a near duplicate page out there.
Thanks for the info Brandon.
So the question pages that have a lot of info are a standalone page....but a lot of the time it's going to have very similar info to the hub because they're tightly related topic wise.
Personally I think that could be the issue.
But you're correct in that the page should still be indexed.
It's a puzzle.
Maybe it was some kind of glitch.
Yeah, most likely some sort of glitch. Yes, they do have similar info a lot of the time, that's why I do not use the feature much. I also pointed this out on the forums to the HP staff and included it in my SEO guide.
HP did a good thing by redirecting questions that do not receive a lot of search engine traffic back to the parent hub. That is one of the good ways to deal with the issue while still offering the possibility of separate question pages.
Another thing that can cause this is Google testing various queries against each other to see which ones searchers like best.
Did you make any major changes to the article - especially to the title?
No, not in the last couple of weeks. However, the article was substantially changed, including the title, about three months ago when it was HubPro'd. Traffic increased from around 500 to over 700 since then.
It's been plagiarized a lot in the past, but I can't find any copies at the moment.
Changes that long ago shouldn't affect it now so it's probably not that.
The other reason I've seen cause temporary de-indexing is when you get a really great, super authoritative link.
It's like Google is testing you to see if it's a natural link or a self made one.
When it's self made and traffic tanks the author often goes and removes it. That tells google straight away!
When it's a real link your page comes back stronger than ever.
Bev, in your original post you indicated it was gone from all search engines you checked, not just Google.
I would think that would suggest an issue with the niche site, not necessarily Google confusion. I believe Startpage pulls from the Google results, but I'd think it would be strange for Bing and the other sites to lose your article as well.
Yes, that's correct. I checked them again today and it is there. It was as if it had vanished.
@Susanna, no links or edits made in the last three months. Although I went into edit mode to republish it yesterday without making any changes just to see if that would bring it back.
Traffic is slowly climbing back up. It's around half normal at the moment.
I wonder if the others who mentioned theirs had gone the same way have seen them return yet?
Edit: And the top traffic source is now google.com yay!
Edit2: And... and... I just got a spam comment on it. Double yay!
I meant a link coming in from elsewhere.
But I also forgot you said your page was gone from all search engines. I think it must have been some glitch for that to happen. Maybe with Hubpages sitemap
My article is back in Google search results and the views are gradually recovering.
I think what Susan S said earlier might be right. Google might be testing if a super authoritative link to our articles is natural or self made.
I don't really know much about this, but I did read something he other day that might be useful in this situation. As I understood it, when you have a ton of similar content coming from one website, it probably won't allow all of them to be in the top positions. Otherwise, people would just dominate the top spots by blasting their site with re-written posts about the same content. I wonder if that is how google see's the niche sites? Maybe you're compeating with other people on the niche site?
I had the same issues with a few articles over the past week and am starting to see some recovery.
It was quite jarring though, went from 125+ views daily to under 20. Perhaps Hubpages is implementing the AMP pages across the sites and it's temporarily screwing with the search results.
How is it today? I had a big drop in search engines the other day, but everything seems back to normal now.
Check this thread for better info. https://hubpages.com/community/forum/34 … ost4034075
by Eric Dockett 6 years ago
When searching for unscrupulously borrowed copies of my work sometimes I come across results that don't seem to really be there. Even though I search for a sentence in quotes, and the SERPs shows that quote in my results, when I click on the link either the text isn't really there, or I get a...
by Will Apse 7 years ago
There is a lot of SEO related stuff about Panda in these forums, so here is something about quality and the kinds of content Google is trying to find and offer to searchers:It comes from Amit Singhal, Google Fellow and High Priest of search.Would you trust the information presented in this...
by Marina 4 years ago
Today we're changing the internal search engine on HubPages to run Google Custom Search. We know that search on HubPages didn't always work as intended, and we expect Google to ultimately provide more relevant results for both Hubbers and visitors using the site. The new search feature should not...
by NotPC 6 years ago
I have been experimenting with Google to find new techniques to drive more search traffic and I found one that is quite silly but has doubled my traffic within about a week of updating my hub.Here it is: THE RATING CAPSULEIt's really quite silly, but I added a rating capsule to the bottom of my...
by SuperheroSales 6 years ago
I just read a Hub that said that the author was going to go to the freelance website and pay people to write articles for him that he would put on HubPages to make himself money from. That can't be okay with the HubPages site, is it? A couple of people commented, including an author that I have...
by Janis Leslie Evans 4 years ago
I'm researching for my latest hub article and noticed that the top articles on the subject (at the top of Google) don't have a lot of images at all. They typically have one pic at the top, several links throughout the text, lots of blocked text, and are fairly short but very well written by pros....
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|