What's the point in keeping us from linking to our own work in our articles? That's how we increase traffic to our articles!
You can link to your own articles if your article is not on a niche site, niche sites don't allow links because Google might see it as spam.
You can link from your hub to your other hubs when appropriate. But you cannot link from a niche site to any of your hubs on hubpages. They did this because they thought Google considered hubpages as a spammy domain a few years ago.
What about a hub later transferred to a niche site? Previously linked links get removed automatically?
To reiterate what lobobrandon said, when I clicked on the link to this thread from my gmail inbox McAfee gave me a "Whoa! are you really sure you want to go there?" message.
Also, when I was writing for paid online content providers, CopyPress included, HP was listed as one of the sites that cannot be used in research. That's because many of us are not "experts". So, if you want to rank with Google, you don't want to link to an article on HP.
Crowd Source and Mechanical Turk, which is a Google site (and through which HP writers can act as editors, if accepted) both list HP as a no-no site for research. Other sites are:
That's because freelance writers are paid to write for these sites. As a once-upon-a-time-ago online freelance writer, I was be paid for any subject as long as it was written well. However, only expert contributors to expert sites are considered as reliable sources in the eyes of Uncle Google.
HP is becoming a viable resource through the niche sites. If your article rests on HP, it's pretty much there for author practice. They don't rank with Google and they don't make you any money. Try to crank up your articles to fit within a niche site and you'll have more success. Linking to your own articles is spammy.
Also, watch what you put into your articles. Your last two "around the world" articles were not only way too long, but much of the verbiage was not yours. I know how you speak/write. There were many issues in the last two articles that told me you were pretty much copying from your research. That's also a HUGE no-no!
I have never had that problem. I have many articles that interlink between my hubs but I do limit the number of links. You cannot link endlessly AND the links must be related to your topic. HP being listed as a site people cannot use for research is very strange because we have many writers here who actually ARE experts and professionals or who know a great deal about a particular topic.
I have linked from articles on one niche site to another on a related topic on a different niche site. I did it twice on the last piece I wrote, which was featured three days later and not changed at all.
The new article was long, and I touched upon a subject I had to mention, but didn't have time to discuss more, so linked to it.
I have very seldom interlinked articles from different niche sites as they aren't very relevant. Can't remember any at all, offhand.
But I very often link between articles on the same niche - if I didn't I'd have a few 50,000 word articles rather than many 3,000 word ones. I don't see it useful to a reader to force them to read, or even page through, extremely long articles to find the information they need.
As long as you're linking related hubs, there won't be a problem with the editors. There are only two instances I can remember that they deleted my links.
1. When I tried linking hubs from different niche.
2. When I tried to redirect readers to a hub with the same niche. They simply don't want readers to hop from one hub to another. Therefore, I was required to give all information needed in that single hub.
Following on from Bravewarrior's comment, I too noticed you (the OP) have lifted text from the BBC Good Food website and other websites, like Spanish Sabores. This is plagiarism and not allowed.
Better clean it up before you get reported for copyright abuse.
I hate plagiarism... it's happened to me too damn often.
Edit: I've looked at quite a few of your hubs, Victoria, and there is a lot of material you have lifted from elsewhere. I'm really disappointed.
Me too. That might be another answer to her other question, and would account for slow traffic. 100 well written original articles are going to get more traffic than 500 copies.
Or one original article in some cases. Vanessa, are they extracts that you use from other articles or do you copy sections entirely? That's not how research is done btw, that's plagiarism. I haven't checked out your hubs, just interpreting from what I read here.
I will use a sentence here or there, which I always rephrase, and then I include the link stating where I got the information from, even if it's now in my own words. Linking to other's work provides outside links to reputable sources giving the article some credibility, and it shows where all of my research came from. There is no credibility if readers are simply relying on my expertise on a subject. They need to know that I actually did my research and found information from sites that they deem reliable.
HubPages has never had a problem with my quotes and links, as long as they are to outside reputable sources, and not my own work. I have a Doctorate in Education. I certainly know what plagiarism is, for those throwing the word around loosely.
Also a doctorate, but it should be fine as long as you're not copying chunks and you're referencing them.
I know what I'm doing. HubPages doesn't seem to think I'm quoting enough. They frequently ask me to include more quotes and references in my work. So I'm always going back and doing even more research after they've edited to include more quotes in my work. The two articles specifically mentioned above have both been edited already and moved to niche sites. I'm not worried.
What I don't like is that I can't link to some of my own articles, but I think I understand now why we can't link to hubpages.com. I just need to work on getting those onto niche sites as well so it's not an issue.
I also have a PhD, but it's not in writing online content so I am not sure how it is relevant. I can't tell what your actual complaint is, specifically. Linking to your other hubs is allowed. Perhaps post the actual message you are getting so we can work out what the issue is. Sometimes the phrasing of their messages is less than clear.
I've answered the query and others have too. You are not allowed to link from a niche site to articles on hubpages.com. Period.
Exactly, writing online is not the same thing. With algorithms having copied content even if it's a few extracts can mark your content as duplicate and therefore you never rank.
Theraggededge: Be careful about throwing that word around. I quote from other sites like I've been taught to do in my education, or I rephrase, but I always post the link showing where I got my information. I never plagiarize, which by definition is claiming that work is your own without including the original author's information.
Hubpages has never had an issue with my work, and has even asked me to go back and include more quotes in my articles after editing them. Your disappointment with me is noted. I'll certainly work harder to live up to your expectations of me in the future.
I'm so glad that my honest question was met with criticism and judgement. That certainly makes me want to ask more questions in the future.
Okay... for example on your Autumn Recipes article you have a section about Haggis. You do link inline to the BBC recipe, but you have also lifted the text straight off the website without making it clear that it's a quote. It is presented as your writing and anyone reading will assume that it's yours. That's not the way to do it.
Put quotes around the text, credit the original author or organisation, and then add the link with the appropriate anchor text.
You do the same with the other sections. It seems you have used other people's work for the majority of the article.
Edit: Here is the BBC text:
A traditional Scottish dish most people either love or hate, given its unique list of ingredients. Haggis is usually made by combining sheep's 'pluck' (heart, liver and lungs) with onion, oatmeal, suet, spices, soaked in stock and then boiled in the sheep's stomach.
Haggis is traditionally served as part of the Burns supper annually on January 25th, when Scotland's national poet, Robert Burns, is celebrated.
Here is yours, with no credit given:
This is a traditional Scottish dish most people either love or hate, given its unique list of ingredients. Haggis is usually made by combining sheep's 'pluck' (heart, liver and lungs) with onion, oatmeal, suet, spices, soaked in stock and then boiled in the sheep's stomach. Haggis is traditionally served as part of the Burns supper annually on January 25th, when Scotland's national poet, Robert Burns, is celebrated.
by Nathan Bernardo 3 years ago
I wrote an article and put a link to one of my other articles which is on a niche site. So, it's a link from Hubpages to a niche site. Now many are saying Hubpages looks bad to Google. Is this link going to be considered a "bad" one and affect rank in the search engine?
by promisem 5 years ago
I have been pleased with the audience and revenue for my articles on HubPages since joining the site some years ago.I commend the company for creating the successful niche sites at a time when similar sites were folding. My existing articles that moved to those sites have done even better than...
by HubPages 6 months ago
Hi all! In order to strengthen our link architecture, our editing team will now be adding relevant interlinks to articles that come through our editing queues. These interlinks will preferably be added as hyperlinks in the body of the text but may be added as a "recommended reading"...
by Louise Fiolek 2 weeks ago
Hi everyone,Since Google's updates these past couple of months, I've noticed a significant traffic drop (about 20%). Every time I gain some traction and hope, it's a case of going back two steps again. I'm sure I'm not alone! I thought it might be a good idea to start a healthy discussion here to...
by BennyTheWriter 12 years ago
Is there any value in linking to your own hubs within OTHER hubs and your profile page, in terms of search engine page ranking? Any advantage at all? I've seen a lot of people do this.If this is a silly question, please forgive me; I'm still relatively new here. Thanks.
by Rupert Taylor 14 months ago
It is my habit to list the sources I use for each article at the end and to link to those that have an internet presence. But sometimes I get this message from HubPages:"We noticed you have a number of links grouped together. To keep your article Featured, please incorporate useful, relevant...
Copyright © 2023 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|