Is it just me or, with all of Google's recent updates, are things getting worse over in the Google SERPs?
A couple of weeks ago I was researching an article that had to do with true crime. The keywords I searched were completely innocuous (not violent, not suggestive) and several of the results on the first page brought up super graphic adult content from sites that would probably immediately destroy my laptop.
Is anyone else noticing this?
Like, I thought with all of Google's refining of results this year, specifically in the last few weeks, those results would be weeded out of first page results (look, if my keywords were suggestive of that content, and that's what I was looking for, then it would make sense for that to pop up first, but to come up on a result to a query that simply included the fairly infamous names of the people I was researching seems super strange to me. I was expecting a flurry of news articles, not something I can find on HBO late night).
This isn't the only instance where first or even second page search results give me exactly the opposite of what I'm searching for. It seems to me, that Google's recent updates are a huge step back for desirable, quality SERPs.
Anyone have any idea what Google is trying to do here? I thought the #1 goal was to be intuitive about what users want, but lately I'm finding myself having to spend way more time gleaning through and digging deeper to find a result that satisfies my queries.
To sum it up, as a Google user, I'm finding it increasingly difficult to pull up a page that is actually relevant to me and includes quality content and reliable information. What gives?
"Anyone have any idea what Google is trying to do here?"
Yes. Google is trying to keep people on Google until they click on an ad.
Relevant organic search results are no longer helpful to Google's revenue, profit and stock price growth.
Facebook is doing the same thing.
Not true. If Google does not show relevant organic results people are going to move away and there will be no one to click on their ads. It is in their best interest to give you the user good organic results.
Yes true. Just visit webmaster websites to see how many are complaining that relevance matters much less. And people are moving away because Google's organic search market share is declining.
In response, Google is running TV ads to boost search, which it doesn't ever do.
It is in its best interest to boost revenue more than organic search results. Both provable and logical from a business perspective.
A business cares about and needs to care about profit, revenue and stock price more than any other factor. It will sacrifice market share to serve those needs.
Google could never maintain search dominance unless it satisfied its users. There used to be a "writing for adsense" technique that involved leading on readers without giving the desired info and thus forcing an ad click. But Google has never been about that.
I understand. Google is willing to sacrifice part of that search dominance for the sake of maintaining its financial growth.
Google is not saintly. Not long age the EU fined Google €1.49 billion for abusing its dominance in search by excluding rival advertising platforms.
But that is quite different to deliberately providing poor search results to prompt ad use.
There is a lot of stuff going on in search at the moment. I don't use Alexa, Siri or similar but apparently when asked to search Google they only return one or two results. This might be a reason for the snippets thing. Google wants a result it feels is reliable, since it is only offering one.
I am sure there are a great many other things driving search evolution. AI that can replace human writers altogether might be twenty years or twenty months away.
I agree that Google isn't saintly and that a lot of factors impact search.
Given a choice of publishing 10 articles on HP that each produce $50 a month or 50 articles that each produce $5 a month, I suspect most writers who want to earn a living from their writing would choose the former. We are choosing profit first.
Google's massive search volume also comes at a huge labor and technology cost to the company. That cost eats into profits as the company struggles to maintain its financial growth.
I wouldn't go so far to say that Google is "deliberately providing poor search results". I would say it's allowing organic relevance and market share to decline for the sake of growing ad revenue, limiting costs and protecting profit.
Why do you think the company is struggling to maintain its financial growth? I don't keep track of stock prices, etc. Is there something you see going on?
Both its profit and revenue growth are slowing. The company had a weak first quarter, and its stock price took a big hit.
I have read Google's quarterly financials for years. It used to report how much money it shared with AdSense partners. When the trend started getting worse, the company started hiding those numbers because it had to shift better paying ads from partners to its own properties.
I'm not saying the sky is falling for Google. I'm just saying that Google needs to keep better ads on its own sites and share less with AdSense partners to maintain its growth rate.
Webmaster forums are packed with people complaining about the same thing.
https://www.thestreet.com/investing/ear … s-14942127
But if it is sharing more and more with Adsense partners that also means they are making more and more through their Adsense network, right? If HP is paying people more and more through their Ad program, this means they are making more too since they are getting 40% of it all. I read the article too. Still don't see why increased payments to adsense partners is a problem.
I'm not saying it's sharing more with AdSense partners. I'm saying it's sharing less.
Besides the skyrocketing complaints in AdSense webmaster forums, I also point to the growing number of small and medium sites that have collapsed in recent years. Nearly ALL of the smaller travel sites in my niche from 10 years ago are now gone.
I know site owners left and right who are giving up. Some of them have seen a 90% decline in ad revenue. That's no exaggeration.
And I can tell you that I still have many contacts at small and large media companies who also have been fighting huge problems with declining online ad revenue because only a small handful of companies like Google and Facebook are grabbing most of it.
Is HP paying everyone more and more? Or is the company doing better for some people because it has jammed several more ad positions on every page? Is any improvement strictly because of AdSense?
Yes, some are doing fine. But many are not.
No online ad company, not even Google, can grow 25% a year forever when total online advertising is growing 10% a year and slowing.
https://www.groupm.com/news/groupm-fore … rowth-2018
The search results are awful lately, especially when it comes to health related queries.
I'm finding many results unsatisfying and I'm having to search further back or keep altering the search query.
Hopefully Google will roll some of the changes back.
You are not alone. I have read and heard from many other people about the same thing.
I had solid #1 ranks in Google for a series of keywords for 10 years. They had zero competition, which I'm sure you know is extremely rare.
In the last year or so, they are lucky to make it to page 1. Major brands with links to much less relevant content have taken over.
When I write about Google products for my online business blog, I strangely seem to do better with both rankings and AdSense. Gee, what a coincidence ...
Same on the health! I Google very simple stuff (I know better than to diagnose anything on Google, but it's helpful with two little kids to get an idea for how to ease ear infection pain, etc.) and everything that pops is like YOU'RE DYING. EVERYONE IS DYING. I'm spending much more time sifting through results to find something that's actually helpful and informative. If I'm searching Google for health-related stuff, I'm also usually looking for anecdotal stuff from other moms, not WebMD articles - if I want doctor advice I'll call my pediatrician.
To clarify, are you talking about ads in the search results themselves (like the "shopping" stuff at the top of SERPs) or do you mean ads on the pages themselves (that show up in the SERPs)? Because I thought that adult content couldn't have Google ads on them.
Not only as a writer, but as a consumer, I have to say the quality of Google search had deteriorated. It takes a lot of effort to find simple information.
by Susana Smith 11 years ago
There have been several theories about what content Google is penalising and rewarding in the search results but at the moment it does seem a bit random (from my end). Let's compare notes and hopefully we can see some common threads in there. What content of yours is holding on to its ranking and...
by Marina 7 years ago
Today we're changing the internal search engine on HubPages to run Google Custom Search. We know that search on HubPages didn't always work as intended, and we expect Google to ultimately provide more relevant results for both Hubbers and visitors using the site. The new search feature should not...
by getpaidtopost 12 years ago
Bing.com is set to become the new search engine from Microsoft. Microsoft say they want to start over again and the new Bing.com site is it. Do you think we need another search engine? I think Microsoft want to take Google's place in the world. what do you think.
by DasEngel 4 years ago
I published a hub a about three weeks ago, titled: "Defining My Purpose on HubPages: Aftermath of My Wars on HubPages Forums". I've written and published one more hub after that (it's still undergoing the site's quality assessment process) and I'm planning to write more hubs.I...
by Ellen 10 years ago
1. Relevance to search query2. Quality of content3. User experience4. Relevance to search query5. Authority of author (I hope Hubpages gets rel="me" working.)6. Relevance to search query7. Who's linking to you8. Relevance to search queryBut BESIDES that. Here's some useful stuff.READ...
by Mark Ewbie 10 years ago
I need reassuring.Up until a few months back I understand, maybe wrongly, HP pages got additional boost from Google. That implies (to me) that Google wanted content farms to churn out pages so that every possible search term was covered by pages that had associated Adsense advertising.Now...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|