I recently had an article take a dramatic plunge in views and am trying to figure out why. I had approved a couple very long comments that included misspellings and punctuation errors (now that the Q & A is gone I'm getting some lengthy comments)! Can these comments lead to a plunge? I've since deleted them but would like to know. Thanks!
If a comment contain errors posted on my articles, I deleted them.
Thanks, Miebakagh. I'll do the same. I've learned my lesson!
The thing with On-Page SEO is that you can test stuff. Instead of deleting those comments you would have unpublished them and seen if it affected your traffic after a month or once the new changes have been indexed.
Deleting comments with errors certainly would help, but a sudden drastic drop, is unlikely, though possible.
Thanks, Brandon. I thought that the plunge was due to the comments because it happened right after I approved them. If that wasn't the case, what could account for such a dramatic drop?
As I said, it's very unlikely that it was the case, so you will have to test. How long is your article and how unrelated was the comment? If it was just bad spelling and punctuation it most likely is not the culprit unless that forms a major portion of the article. I would not leave it on anyway, but there are plenty of reasons for a sudden drop, it's usually an algorithm update or a change in headings, etc.
Misspellings and other errors can definitely affect your SEO ranking. Google treats comments as part of the content.
Several years ago I cleaned up my comments across many of my articles, removing comments with poor grammar, misspellings, useless (such as “nice hub”), and those that were off topic (not related to the subject).
I monitored the results. It took time, but eventually those hubs had improved traffic.
Many of my articles are geared towards gaming (both electronic and card games), hobbies which often appeal to younger folks, and I believe youth have a tendency to use slang or incorrect grammar when commenting. This leads to rejecting several comments that would be fine if the grammar was better; any advice? Thanks!
This is something that beats my mind. If the speakers and writers of convention English can make vital mistakes, slang spearkers cannot be an exception. But a slang can be in tanden with the content of the article. It would be hard to judge this at times. But I believe standard english is the best tool or yardstick.
If it is commonly accepted slang and not SMS language, go ahead and approve the comments. Otherwise do what you are doing.
Hi Jeremy, The best advice I can give you in that case is to do what I do. I feel bad when someone who can't write a decent English sentence asks for help. I feel they at least deserve an answer.
So I answer them, but I keep a record in my "to-do" list to delete that comment and my reply a few days later. That gives them a chance to see the reply before Google crawls the page again.
Not completely related, but I did not want to create a new post about comments. Do you know if it's possible to reverse an admin denied comment? I was going through and cleaning up some of the comments in my articles and noticed at some point the admin's denied a comment. It's a comment I responded too, so I was wondering if I could reverse their decision or if I should just hide my comment.
I have no idea why it was denied (or when it was, as I approved it so I could respond to them). I'm finding several that were admin approved that are full of misspellings, nonsense, or simply great hub/article, which is still happening currently if I do not get to them fast enough before they get sent to admin so I'm really confused by this denied comment.
That’s interesting. I’ve had admin approved comments in the past (over a year ago), but never admin denied. So I don’t know if you can reverse them.
I complained about pre-approving to the team. When they approved comments for me, I ended up not responding to the reader’s questions because they were no longer in my pending list and I didn’t see them.
But your situation is even worse! I can’t imagine why they would approve comments that are low quality — even as bad as nonsense and useless statements such as “nice hub” — which Google responds to badly.
It sounds like they hired someone to approve comments who has no idea what they are doing. That needs to be brought to their attention. I would email the team with details of your comments they approved.
Leave a follow-up here when you get a reply. I’m curious to know what comes of it.
It is the only one I found in the dozen articles I went through today. I found it odd myself and was wondering if anyone else has come across this. I do not spend a lot of time monitoring comments as I do not get that many, especially on this particular article so it's the first time I noticed it. The comment itself is over 2yrs old. For all I know it was denied shortly after I responded to the comment, I honestly have no idea. I will plan to hide my comment, that seems like the easiest route at this point.
Will they have access to the comments approved if I deleted or denied them already? I guess I will find out. I didn't even think about contacting the team, but I will let you know if anything comes of it!
This is from the e-mail I recieved. "We approve comments if they are not spam, inappropriate, or not in English. If the comments are understandable we approve them."
As long as the misspellings do not cause the comment to be completely incomprehendable it seems they will accept them no matter how low quality they are. The comment I shared with him, that I did not completely understand he said seemed okay, despite the errors. I don't completely agree, as I have no idea what the last sentence was asking, but I just denied it anyway and will try to get to them within 7 days from now on.
He also said denied comments can be reversed. Looks like mine was done in error so he reversed it
I'm confused. A few days ago, you began by talking about admin denied comments, which I never hear of (unless you were talking about spam). Your last post is about admin approved comments, which I guess is only done if you don't get to it in time.
How are you moderating your comments? I feel seven days is a long time to keep readers waiting. I check mine daily from the global moderation page where we can approve and reply to all comments in all hubs from one place. There's no need to check each hub individually.
I referred to both in my first comment.
The denied comment was not spam. It was a comment that I had approved and then replied to. Hp staff said it must have been denied by mistake. Not sure how that would happen if I already approved it. He reversed it so it is now viewable so I guess it doesn't matter.
I do not go on HP daily, so unless I get an email (doesn't always happen, no matter how often I check my settings to ensure they are right) I could go up to two or three weeks before checking HP. I didn't know they only waited 7 days before approving comments.
Like I said before though I don't get many comments, so it's usually not a big deal. I do use the main moderation page for checking comments, but if I'm not getting emails I guess I could be getting more comments than I realize. I will have to try and check in more often.
It's good you are using the main moderation page. At least you get to see all comments no matter where they are. And you can change the filter to see the spam, low quality, and admin approved comments too.
I don't know about that 7-day limit. I was merely assuming that when you said they approved one of your comments when you didn't check for seven days. Maybe I misunderstood you.
The HP staff told me it was 7 days. That is a great feature, and really helps when I'm coming back from being gone for awhile. I have used it occasionally. I wish I would have known that years ago. I found some good comments in my spam section, but feel it has been too long to approve them now.
How about this comments: "The photo I am seeing is not your pieture." or "Corvid-19 disease has less merit, if all covid-19 infections were compared in two countries." Do you think these minor mispellings is approved or approvable?
One or two minor typos like those do not deter from the meaning of the comment. They could be approved, in my opinion.
Thanks for the clarification. All the same, it makes sense to me, to cross check my posts, comments, and articles before submitting same. Much thanks again.
Thanks so much, Glenn. This is definitely good to know. The comments were interesting so I approved them but then the drop happened. Unfortunately, I rarely get comments with no errors. I think that I'll do some tidying up like you did!
by RocketCityWriter 7 years ago
Is it rude to point out grammar/spelling mistakes on hubs via comments?I've come across numerous hubs that have grammar and spelling errors, some minor and some littered with mistakes. Otherwise, these hubs would be interesting and will written in my opinion. Is it rude to point out these mistakes...
by HubPages 3 years ago
Hi everyone! We’re pleased to share an exciting update about comments—we know this is an important feature for many of you. We will only be rolling out our new commenting system on AxleAddict for now, but we will keep you posted on when commenting will extend to our other Network Sites. Here are a...
by Louise Barraco 9 years ago
What does the edit bot mean?
by Jim Higgins 11 years ago
It is one thing to hit a double letter (or to skip and "e" like I almost did in letter, but if English is your native language, it seems to me that you should make an effort to spell correctly and use standard English in Hubs you publish and in comments you make. I read a comment this...
by Jeremy Gill 6 years ago
Admins seem to deny almost any comment with even just one misspelled work or a bit of poor grammar. Is there any way to reapprove admin denied comments (particularly old ones)?I understand wanting the comments in our articles to be of high quality, but I don't personally see a problem with a slight...
by Melanie Palen 8 months ago
I saw in my feed that someone wrote a hub and it really interested me because I had something similar happen to me. I went to comment on it but I could not find ANYWHERE to comment on it other than through my feed.How do you comment on the new sites?Also, holy ads. I get why people use ad block.
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |