It is my habit to list the sources I use for each article at the end and to link to those that have an internet presence. But sometimes I get this message from HubPages:
"We noticed you have a number of links grouped together. To keep your article Featured, please incorporate useful, relevant links into the sentence structure of your article."
My understanding is that by linking within the text you are encouraging people to click on the link thereby leaving your page. That doesn't sound like a good idea.
You are correct. I only include hyperlinks in the article if it is very helpful or articles on the same site. It does send people off to other sites, which is bad for HP.
Not much we can do about those letters from the editors though. If they do unfeature an article because of that I would write the team at HP and let them know.
I agree with you Rupert. The only way to avoid that is to hold the Control key while clicking on the link; that opens the link in a new window.
That said, references are usually found at the bottom of the page. Within the text itself, small numbers are placed slightly above the area(s) or the name of the source are put in parentheses then are more fully referenced below the article, with correlating numbers for each.
Another way to cite your sources can be found in this article:
https://guides.library.ucsc.edu/writing/cite_sources
Didn't hubpages want visitors to stay put on their sites again? Why try diverting readers attention from reading the article further? I found this very curious.
Rupert - It's not fully clear to me what you are doing that inspires these messages from HP. I've used both in-text and source lists for years and not encountered this.
What does "links grouped together" mean?
I can't help but wonder if there's some specific issue in your case?
In-text links are generally the way sources are done nowadays. I just see HP as reflecting the general norm.
I don't think that people do necessarily click on the links all that often, but regardless, I think HP are right on this.
Links can also be a factor in SEO. That may also be an issue in this case, I don't know.
What about linking to an article that HP complained about, so we can see it here?
It's still in the swill bucket of HubPages, so I don't know if you can see it, but here's the link I have
https://hubpages.com/hubtool/edit/6041095
It's interesting to note that during the mammoth editing task just completed I was asked to provide links to sources. Previously, I did not add links because I recalled vaguely this was something the Big G did not like.
Conflicting information all around. Time for a nap.
That link doesn't work for me.
It sounds like you used a poor source for info about linking. Google doesn't like spammy links. But links to reputable sites have never been bad, they add credibility.
The link did not work for me either. I'm assuming the subtitle reads along the lines of resources/sources/ect? How many links are you putting in?
When editors went through Pethelpful at the beginning of the year, they added 3-4 links with the subtitle "sources and further reading" or in some cases it simply says "further reading" with links to other not as reliable sites. I went in and changed some of those links, but I had to keep some links to stay on Pethelpful at the time. I thought it was odd, especially since they kept linking out to SprucePets (which is one of Pethelpful's top competition sites and is not one I would call an authority over HP).
Sounds like these new editors might want resources linked in a different way, which is honestly kind of annoying. It's hard to keep up and know what is and is not accepted when the guidelines are constantly changing and we are not being informed in advance.
Maybe it comes down to different editor's having different preferences?
My view is that they're doing work to add sources to increase credibility. I've had the add sources request from them, just not the "links grouped together" problem.
There may be SEO reasons too for their link changes, I can't be certain.
Google is effectively the judge and jury on what counts as "reputable." It may not be what you and I consider reputable. The way I see it, if Google has placed something high in the rankings, then it's "reputable" by definition.
I know we are at the whim of Google, but I'd prefer not to be linked out to similar competition. Especially competition that is sharing controversial or wrong information, no matter how high Google would like to rank it. Generally speaking though I've found more relavent Pethelpful links above SprucePets. At least at the time of the Pethelpful overhaul when I was working on my articles.
Linking out only gives them more of an advantage over HP, so why not keep the links on the niche site? Why would we want to give Google more ammunition to think a site that is like ours is better? I get linking out to ASPCA, Cesar, AKC, ect, but not to a site that has changed and evolved to be exactly like HP. We are only giving them more of an advantage by linking back to them.
We have an expert here in the niche one of my articles was on. I switched all my article links to Pethelpful or other actual resource type links. I'd rather try and help a fellow HP member than some other content site I don't agree with. They accepted the changes, so I'm assuming it didn't really matter where the links were to.
Is this the article you are referring to? https://owlcation.com/humanities/Twin-P … -Both-Fake
My thoughts about the sources list at the end is that by including links here you are duplicating information. You have given all the information (title, publication, date, author etc) that someone needs if they want to find the original document. You don't need to include links in this list as well.
Alternatively, an in-text link in the body of an article is a shorthand way of providing this reference information and saves you having to list sources at the end.
I always use ASA style for my references listed at the end. It’s crucial to provide credible sources to get onto the niche sites, especially for YMYL articles.
As for the choice of in-text hyperlinks, I have received confirmation from staff that it’s our choice, and editors should accept either method.
However, some editors make their own judgments from my experience, and all I had to do was notify staff, and my preference was included in the editors’ notes.
Thanks to everyone for your suggestions.
The message I get is one of those computer-generated things that appear in a box top right of the article submission. Another favourite is one that says "This article is in danger of being rejected as overly promotional" (or words to that effect) after I've written the intro but before I've posted the article.
The villainous piece in question here is about a shipwreck in 1120 that took out a huge percentage of the Anglo-Norman aristocracy. It's not the fake Parisian cities story Beth.
It seems, as I suspected, that the link to HubPages only works for the author. If it is deemed worthy of going onto Discover I will post the link, but I don't know that this will shed much light.
Linking to sources is certainly something that HP've got more and more strict about over time.
The contentious article has been elevated to the exalted heights of Discover, but I don't think it will answer any questions as to why it was threatened with being unfit for featuring because of a cluster of links.
https://discover.hubpages.com/education … yal-Family
Yes, I had a look, and I can't see what the source list problem is. Have you tried emailing the editors for clarification?
You could maybe try making the sources into in-text links and see if that helps?
I have quite a few articles in the niches with source lists that seem to be okay. That said, I do more often use in-text links with the new material I write, as that seems to be the thing nowadays.
Thanks Paul. I needed to sample the opinion in the forum before consulting the editors.
If the in-text link is the thing nowadays(no doubt about that), has hubpages strongly recommended it to be employ in our articles?
The oracle hath spoken. It boils down to author choice. In text, if that's your fancy, or clustered at the end if you prefer that. It makes the notice that triggered this thread entirely superfluous.
My apologies for wasting everybody's time.
No, you don't waste our time. It's part of the learning process ever. Now, I know what to do with an in-text link sparely where appropriate.
You're right, Rupert. You were correct all along. It indeed is our choice. As I mentioned earlier in this thread, HubPages staff confirmed that when I questioned them. Just remember to use ASA style when placing references at the bottom for better SEO.
by Cholee Clay 2 years ago
Has anyone else experienced editors adding a further reading section to the end of their article? I have not had an article edited in quite some time and I'm not sure the best way to go about this. Email them or change/remove the links myself?Three of the four links are exactly what I wrote and are...
by Victoria Van Ness 8 months ago
What's the point in keeping us from linking to our own work in our articles? That's how we increase traffic to our articles!
by Eric Dockett 20 months ago
I noticed what appears to be an automatically generated link in one of my Pethelpful articles. I didn't add it, and I can't get rid of it. I can't even see it in edit mode. Even if I delete the word, it just adds a new link at the next instance of that word.It links out to another Pethelful article...
by Liam Hallam 12 years ago
Do you have a source for backlinks, traffic and seo that you'd like to share with the community? Is there somewhere in your particular knowledge area you use to help develop more backlinks?Please share your more unique sources or ideas you have Please don't simply post 'I don't need to backlink!'...
by Brett A Rogers 10 years ago
This is how I understand backlinks. Linking to a webpage that links back to you is more valuable to SEO than not having it link back to you. The more removed this website is from your own the better. For example, linking from one of my hubs to a non-hubpages webpage is more...
by Brian Leekley 10 years ago
If this is not the correct place to ask my questions, please let me know where to go on HubPages, or if I should send an email to the people running HubPages.A few months ago an expert hubber with lots of experience and success for a time offered free critiques of hubs in one of the forums. I asked...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |