Attention Hubbers! Check you hubs IMMEDIATELY. I was reviewing one of my hubs and found a link to another hubbers article. Puzzled, I went to edit mode to remove it but it didn't show up. Obviously, the editors placed it there. I have emailed them to remove it.
Remember! Our hubs are our own copyrighted articles. NO ONE is legally allowed to make changes to our hubs without our express consent.
I have noticed some Hubpages sites have automated links on nouns in the text - often very irrelevant to the article.
I assume Hubpages leadership has decided to do this. I mean, it's in line with their current approach of trying to improve their metrics and not keeping us in the loop,
I would think that publishing on the platform means we have to accept that articles can be edited as per the ToS.
These appear to be shadow links. I have removed them by following standard link removal steps, and the connection disappears. Matt Wells should chime in to clarify this for you and us.
I do not know what shadow links are (and searching was not helpful), but are you talking about the same links? I tried unlinking with the hubtool unlink button and nothing happened. My history does not show I even edited the article. I'm not sure of any other way we could try and edit them. In the above link I posted, HP staff said neither writers nor editors had the ability to change the links.
"Since keywords and their corresponding links are determined outside of the HubTool, there is no way for authors or editors to modify those links within the HubTool."
I penned the name shadow link myself because that is what they seem like. I removed one when I highlighted it and clicked the button to remove it. I then checked the article online, and it was gone.
My point is that what they are doing is illegal. No one, not HubPages, not TAG, no one is allowed to alter copyrighted documents. I showed it to a friend who is a lawyer and they were appalled. They said that the liability is enormous if HP is doing it to all the thousands of hubs on the site.
Like psycheskinner said, you likely found one of their automated links. They have been around for awhile now, close to a year I think. There was a discussion regarding it, where HP staff popped in, but I don't think there was an offical announcement about it. https://hubpages.com/community/forum/35 … ated-links
Certain keywords link to an article of their choice (oddly enough those articles also have a link to themselves). I do not think they can be removed, unless staff were to completely unlink the keyword. I have several in some of my articles (one of my articles actually has 7 such links) and if I change the word the link simply appears at the next instance of the auto linked keyword.
We should absolutely be able to vet all links and decide if they are in line with our articles, beliefs, opinions, ect.
I will keep saying this, over and over again. What they are doing is illegal. It is a violation of our copyrights. They can be taken to court and end up paying millions in fines. It doesn't matter that it is automated. What matters is that they are altering copyrighted documents which is against the law in every civilized country in the world. That's probably why there wasn't an announcement. They were hoping we didn't notice or care or that we would think that it was okay.
I want to hear from their legal department on this. Was it approved? What is their justification? Are they willing to defend that justification in court in multiple countries?
I would love for this practice to stop and was not a fan of it from the beginning. I'm wondering if we actually have any legal ground to stand on though? I was under the impression there was nothing I could do about it back then.
I will be the first to admit I do not completely understand the legal side, nor all the ways we have legally allowed HP/TAG/whomever to use our work, but the way I was interpretting points 3 & 7, made it seem like I did not have a choice in the matter. I either ignore the links, or take my work elsewhere.
https://thearenagroup.net/author-submis … -addendum/
Yes, I've been encouraged to add my own links to new articles but when I don't the editors add those of other hubbers.
I don't think it's quite that simple. Copyright can be partially or fully waived by the owner.
Are you certain that you didn't give permission for TAG to "modify, edit, adapt" your work when you submitted it for publication?
"The Platform, including all content contained therein, including Partner Content and Submitted Content, text, graphics, images, photographs, audio, videos, illustrations, themes, objects, stories, concepts, artwork, and other content contained therein, are owned by Arena or our licensors and are protected under both United States and foreign laws. Except as explicitly stated in these Terms, all rights in and to the Platform are reserved by us or our licensors."
I think if you publish on your own site, then you maintain full ownership and are therefore fully protected by things like copyright laws.
It gets way more complicated when you publish on a site that's not owned by you and they've asked you to surrender certain rights.
I suspect also that there's an important distinction to be made between "ownership" and "copyright."
I did work in an Information for Business department of a city library at one time. It gave me an insight into how bl**dy complicated it all can be.
I doubt it is illegal. They can insert ads between sections of our text, and inserting a link does not change the text itself. But I am no contract lawyer, so who knows.
I have a couple of WordPress sites and years ago I added a plugin that hyperlinks keywords to specific articles. I decided against these plugins after a while and uninstalled them. I think hyperlinked keywords in hubs could be because of a plugin so you could email the editors to remove the hyperlinks from their end.
It does add even more to the "over-saturated with ads" look
OldRoses, you have to understand that you permitted HubPages/TAG to modify your hubs by using the platform. That is in the terms of service.
In addition, this linking process was officially announced in one of the weekly newsletters about a year ago. It could be helpful when done right since our hubs are also included in others—bringing us traffic as well.
However, the problem I see is that they are not careful with how they apply it. For example, someone's hub linked from one of mine had later been moved from its niche site back to HubPages. Then, one day, I received a nasty canned email saying I should not link to HubPages from niche sites.
I know that! And I say that was nasty because THEY are the ones who put the link in my hub.
When those hubs are moved, these links evidently change to the new URL. They must have an algorithm to do that automatically. So, my hub ended up having a link to HubPages, triggering that nasty canned warning. So I removed it.
I think there is some confusion regarding what types of links are being talked about. I never saw an official announcement in the forums, nor the weekly newsletter (although I don't read those as often). There was an announcement regarding a different linking system in the offical forums, but those are not the same.
The auto links which I think is what OldRoses is talking about, only certain keywords link out to certain articles (for example all the links for cow go to the exact same cow article, but like Titia demonstrates in her reply the wording has to be the exact way in the system for it to trigger a link). There is zero give and take. None of my articles from the last I checked are being linked to from this auto system. On the flip side, Larry Slawson, has at least 10.
That's not a system I want to be a part of. It is great if you are on the receiving end, not so much if your articles are taking readers elsewhere, early and often.
I wonder if paoloenergya is correct that it is indeed a plugin. That would explain why we nor editors can modify them. I would assume that means articles moved back to Discover would lose their links, but maybe that is not the case.
However, I do not think you are referring to the same kind of links. You would not have been able to remove the link if it was autolinked. Other articles would have been linking to your article besides just the one that was moved back to Discover. If you are saying your article linked out to someone else's and they moved that one back, I doubt they would have removed a home base link back to Discover without removing it from the auto system. Otherwise they would have a bunch of articles linking back to Discover. I think it is more likely you are referring to a different kind of link that an editor actually put in during the editing process, rather than an autolink.
It would be great if staff came in and clarified this for everyone. I never thought the linking was illegal, but there are instances that I wish I could remove them and cannot.
Yes, you're right that there are two different types of links. I would not have been able to remove the link if it was auto-linked, as you mentioned. So, mine was obviously added manually by an editor.
In addition, to clarify, that announcement I recall seeing in the weekly newsletter must have been about the manually added links. I haven't seen an announcement about auto-linking. I wonder when that actually began.
Eric has a post about it around 8 months ago, HP staff came in and made a comment. I posted the link to that discussion farther up in this thread.
Thanks for posting that link about author submissions. Point number 3 under “AUTHORS AND AUTHOR CONTENT” confirms what I mentioend ealier, that authors give TAG permission to modify and edit our content.
That is how I was interpreting that as well. Point 7 is also important I think for this example as we cannot edit the changes, but it does contain this clause "...Otherwise, if you object to such edits, your sole remedy will be to remove the Author Content from the Platform;..". In this case, we either accept the autolinks, ask to be moved back to Discover, or take our content elsewhere. I did not see any violations of the ToS.
I do not like all the links, but not enough to move my content. From what I can tell, it hasn't helped or hurt my articles anyway. I looked around a few of the niche sites today and I could only find them on Pethelpful and in the dog topic, because it is saturated with them. The other topic autolinks are few and far between from what I could tell back then, and still now.
I wonder if they ever launched the autolinking across the whole site or kept it to the three original ones. If I remember right, the links worked a bit differently between them, and the links on Delishably and Dengarden were more focused on the news section.
Glenn, I was able to remove my link, so it must have been manually entered.
Yes, there are definitely two types of links.
One of my articles was selected for HubPro. The editor made lots of changes and placed many links. I didn't check them. And the traffic went high for that article—approximately more than 1500 views in a week.
I read one of my articles on day one, and I don't see any link. So I forget the issue without commenting.
Today October 3, the thread again runs on my feed page, and I migrated to a network site to check one of my hubs. Again, no linking.
I'm critically tired of linking, and de-linking.
I'll later moved with this hubpages trend.
Some here are saying by hubpages, is either legal or not. But I hope HubPages' don't give ground for scammars by this action to invade our stories.
Those are automated links on keywords. In one of my sheep hubs I write about using cow milk and the word cow linked to an article about cows from someone else. I opened my hub in author view to remove the hyperlink, but there wasn't one. I asked the editor about it and she told me that those were automated links and that they can't do anything about it. I changed the sentence somewhat from cow milk to milk from cows and goats and now the automated link is no longer there.
It's part of the internal link strategy. When I joined HP twelve years ago, there was a similar approach. Then they moved to using the recommended articles to generate internal links.
Almost certainly due to Google algo changes, they've now demoted recommended articles and gone back to text-based internal links.
Regarding the legality, I think we all check various boxes when we sign up and submit articles here. Most of us don't read or necessarily understand what we're agreeing to.
TAG likely see themselves as legally covered, you'd need a lawyer to go through it all in detail to dispute it. I don't see that as a worthwhile exercise but others might differ.
I doubt that we can remove these links. They do change over time and one vanishing might have been a coincidence.
by Anne 9 years ago
So for the last couple of weeks I have actually been studying at University.I now log into my hubpages account and some editor has made all these changes. It reads so stupid.I am furious that someone has touched and changed my hubs! HOW DARE YOU!I notice my earnings too have gone down.My email to...
by Daniel Baker 8 years ago
I have returned to my Hubpages account to find out that I have some broken links to tend to, but, when I view the pages in question in "edit mode", I am not seeing which ones are broken, i.e. highlighted. I have attached some screen shots for reference:This first image shows that I am, in...
by Filip Stojkovski 3 years ago
I have a personal blog, and I was wondering if it's a good idea to write a post where I add reference links to my hubpages articles? Is it a good SEO practice or a bad idea? thanks
by lizmoss71 14 years ago
I have been using the 'suggest links' tool on most of my hubs, and I think it is great. But there are a few links I would like to edit or delete, and I can't find a way of doing it. Does anyone know whether this can be done, and if so how?
by Michael Willis 14 years ago
I have added suggested links to most of my hubs. But, after a conversation in HP, I have decided it is to my best interest to disable ALL suggested links. But HOW?????I went to the hubs with the links, but I see No way to disable this feature. When I try to...I end up going to the hubs linked. How...
by Chitrangada Sharan 5 years ago
Almost everyday, I am getting notifications about 2 to 3 broken links. That means, going back to the specific article, search for another suitable video, editing etc. Involves some extra work everyday. Is it only me?
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |