# Check this out!!. . . .please

Jump to Last Post 1-5 of 5 discussions (6 posts)
1. 60
bangawking000posted 8 years ago

there is a book on logic that we use in our school. everything in it is just soooo difficult to understand. The book is made by our teacher in the university. I really cant pull out what it means

here is the paragraph.

"In complete Inversion, The quality is unchanged, but the predicate is the contrary as the case of the original predicate. by complete inversion A is inverted to I and E to O"

is the paragraph comprehensive or not? .

1. 60
bangawking000posted 8 years agoin reply to this

I think its allot easier to use illustrations. . .people making books are just making things harder for everyone

2. 55
errum fattahposted 8 years ago

oh! my book is more difficult to understand... it says

if A is the multiple inverse of B and C is additive inverse of A then whats the value of B when dividing it by using cranaer's rule( i dont think there is division in craner's rule)..its very difficult..

3. 59
dogluver1posted 8 years ago

Good luck guys!

4. 0
Justine76posted 8 years ago

whoah, sorry guys. That stinks.

5. 0
Lecieposted 8 years ago

way over my head...sorry i reccomend a mathmatician. if you can find one.lol

working