Okay I get it, it's your site so you make the rules, but nothing stifles creativity more than censorship. I suppose there are other sites where one is free to express themselves and maybe one day, I'll find one. I just think that the marketplace will self regulate content a lot better than a "moderator" will. Offensive or other content not worthy of existence will fall to the bottom of the pile to be forgotten and eventually discarded.
How is that socialist? It's democratic. Socialism is having the administrator decide what gets published and making sure that everyone has publishes equal amount. I guess that explains why you enjoy a favorable view of socialism, you don't quite know what it is.
Poppa Blues, it appears that it IS the marketplace that is censoring us. Google is the monetary force that sets the standards and also lets us earn. I'm looking around for an alternative to Google for other content that I might want to publish that does not meet Google's standards, and it's slim pickings.
One can also publish without monetizing at all, but the truth is that the money and the traffic go together. Google has no incentive to point searchers toward a site that Google does not stand to profit from.
If you give it a thought, you will see that it has, in the long run. But then other things equal, site monetized with google probably is likely to win.
BTW a small tip - if you want your brand spanking new site to be indexed fast by Google, put Adsense on it
Google has some power to push back, I suppose, but the real source of those standards are the advertisers themselves and by extension the people to whom the advertisements are aimed. The larger they are and the more an advertiser pays for a spot, the greater assurance they typically will want that their brand will not be sullied by controversial content.
You are talented and I realize you are venting, but they have to moderate. HP does not go from Hub to Hub asking for hubbers to remove there content. It is writers on HP who fall across the hubs that cause them to be flagged where they have to either be edited or removed. HP does allow writers to be expressive but when we signed-up we had to abide by this sites rules. Your existence is a blessing and your creativity is highly-respected on HP don't let censorship get you down if everyone behaved on HP not wishing to flag everything they read , reading only what they liked then Maddie would not have this complicated job. She is only doing what she has to do and that is enforcing the rules because all of us sometimes forget what the rules truly are. Hang in there you are a very expressive writer and we honestly love having you here.
Well thanks for the kind words and the vote of confidence. I really do appreciate it. I only ask if you're going to establish guidelines at least make them objective and not subjective, otherwise there's no way to know if what you're writing is acceptable or not. And, be consistent, don't react to every complaint without at least verifying that the rules have been broken. I know it's easier to just unpublish everything that someone complains about then it is to have to read everything that everyone complains about and then decide if the rules are broken, but that's the downside to censorship, having to have to be the enforcer.
Duly noted words are well taken , I am glad that you have decided to continue on with hubpages. (((Big Hugs)))
Can you explain what's subjective about the rules? In my experience, most of the people who complain about rules being subjective, haven't taken the trouble to learn about them.
They don't. Generally they don't unpublish until they've checked the Hub. The exception is if they check two or three Hubs by one Hubber and find they all break the rules - then they'll unpublish the lot until they've had time to check them.
I think you should post pictures of woman wearing less and less clothing until we find a pic that crosses the line.
At least then we will be in a better position to know what is acceptable
Our adult standards have recently become stricter, in accordance with Google's Adsense policy. You can try to do that, but I can't guarantee that it won't result in a forum ban.
We only moderate around 30% of the hubs that are flagged (our automated system takes down the most obvious offenders). I don't have reliable numbers for forum posts, but I would imagine the vast majority of what we come across on the forums are basic spam. So, we do verify that rules have been broken before we take down something. If we took down everything that was flagged, I would imagine HubPages would be fairly dull and empty.
It is easy for us to verify that rules have been broken, and we never base a moderating decision solely on a hubber's flag. If you disagree with a decision we have made, you can contact us.
Blame AdSense, if it is not accepted by them, it is not accepted by HubPages.
You could post your questions in the appropriate forum thread, for a start.
What advertisers think the general public will want, and what the general public actually wants, may be two different things entirely. This issue used to regularly come up on TV when soap companies paid for soap operas. The soap purveyors wanted the content "clean" but the viewers didn't.
BTW, did Poppa Blues close his account because he was concerned over censorship?
I've written a hub about censorship. I've disabled the ads to it, because the first ads to pop up were about "forbidden" topics. I'm really confused, though. If Google doesn't like ads about forbidden topics, why do they run them?
lol, good point!!! Maybe they don't want to share the revenue they get from them.
Michael, something like that did occur to me with my hub that got banned from Adsense. It was my highest earner at the time when it happened. But... they disabled the ads, so how did this help them? Didn't they cut off their own earnings, too?
I just read what you said about Google placing the "forbidden ads" on your hub. It makes no sense for Google to use these ads and forbid others from using them. (or in others words...others sharing in the profit Google makes.) Sounds more like Do as I say, not as I do.
If Google does not want the "Forbidden Topics" used by us...then Google should not Place those Ads on our Hubs.
I guess I have been lucky so far as to not have a forbidden ad show up. I know when I have seen questionable ads I will rework text capsule titles and tags to see a change in the ads.
Ditto to what Paul said. It's the advertisers that drive Google, and Google in turn drives us.
Many big advertisers won't have their ads placed on a site that would make them look like they promote something they never would. For instance, if you were advertising with a pro life banner and you were paying $8 a click, would you want your ads on hubs about abortion?
These are the probalems Google faces, and the simple solution is to provide guidelines to the publishers and then assure the advertisers that those guidelines will be followed.
Each time the advertisers tighten a beltloop Google has a choice of following the lead or seeing the advertising dollars go away. And if Google loses their money then so do we.
Would it be far better to all write uncensored and make $.05 a day or would it be better to hold our steps in line and prosper to $50 or more? While not everyone here writes for money, would it be fair to allow those who don't to kill the possible profits of those who do?
There are tons of internet sites that allow a writer to express themseves with zero censorship ... these sites also offer no profit. Why? Because large advertisers don't want to associate with this kind of material so as to keep their image pure.
Of course, there is the exception of the adult market, but these companies already have lucrative agreements that X article writers out of the loop. They don't need to pay us to sell their stuff ... sex sells, with very little provocation among users.
The solution is a simple one. for all non-objectionable material, place it here. For all material that is known to be objectionable, post it elsewhere and post a link in your profile showing people where to go to read this extension of your content. There is no rule at HP against this and it resolves the issue totally.
There is certain material that Google will not pay you to write, so it makes no sense to post it on a site like this and to expect to get paid for it ... or to expect it to remain posted with no changes.
It's not us versus HP ... it's us versus Google, which is inevitably us versus the advertisers. And I can tell you this ... big advertisers care not how we feel about censorship. For every man, wmoman, and child who screams 'freedom of speech' they retort with 'freedom to determine where they will place their ads and who they will pay for displaying them'
To argue that the advertisers should bend to our will is to hold one's breath indefinitely, as there are always other sites willing to comply and earn the money we might refuse while touting our claim to not being censored. As such, we bite at the rope and silence ourselves, with the understnading that we all hate censorship, but we also hate not getting paid for all of our hard work.
And let's not forget that it isn't censorship unless an activity is banned everywhere, and HP does not ban any member for placing objectionable material on a site that is not owned by HP. As such, anyone can build their own content offsite and do with it as they choose. Just don't place adsense on such a site, as they will pull your account.
(is it just me, or is Paul looking younger these days?)
Yes, Paul is looking good these days!
Yoshi, if you'll read my earlier posts and my hub on censorship, you'll see that I support Hubpages' right to censor our hubs and Google's right to limit our content, if we want to carry ads.
What bothers me is that:
* there is no recourse if they mistakenly decide we've violated the
* when we publish without ads we often don't get indexed
* there is no alternative so far for adsense
I need to carry ads to get traffic. Forget about revenue. And why do they put dirty ads up when my content is clean?
Did you by chance receive any comments to a hub that could have been suggestive? This is why I monitor all comments. I don't want Google to ban my hubs because someone may leave a comment with words or phrases that could trigger an alert.
Sadly the inevitable truth to it all is this ...
If HP finds material they believe to be objectionable they will rip down your hub, leaving your Adsense account undisturbed.
If Google finds material they believe to be objectionable they will tear away your Adsense account and keep whatever you already have in their bank.
As such, HP is an excellent first line of defense against losing one's Adsense account.
Also, it is a bit unfair that Google can display racy material whereas we can't, and I often wonder if they have issues where they have multiple ads on an article that might not blemd well with one another ... such as a pro gun ad versus one for banning guns.
However, that's google's tail on the line - not ours - so it's not a battle we can fight and win. For us, all we can do is submit, or post objectionable material elsewhere.
My purpose in this thread is not to stand up for Google, but rather, to stand up for HP, as they are proactively saving our bacon and it hurts me to see them kicked in the hind end for doing so. Would it be better if HP did nothing and allowed Google to ban member's accounts? I can assure you, given what I have read on the internet, once an Adsense account is gone it's nearly impossible to get it back and Google doesn't give warnings ... if you make a mistake they consider it the beginnign of a crime career and shut you down without any recourse.
You don't get a re-do with Google, so I think we need to be thankful for the way HP looks out for us.
I didn't receive any suggestive comments, although there were some that were spam and seemed to be marketing schemes or scams. I did not approve those, so they did not show to readers. However, I didn't delete them forever, either, in case I wanted to reconsider my decision.
Do you happen to know what status unapproved comments have for purposes of content review by the Google robots?
Well, I just got a hub deleted without warning that was clearly within adsense's policy for content, so I don't think it's about adsense at all. This really makes me even less inclined to put my main content on hubpages than I already was.
I don't do adult. I'm not saying it was my best hub ever - it really wasn't very good. However it was also not spammy or anything like that.
I'd advise anybody who has trouble with the content policy on hubpages to move over to squidoo, though they too have restrictions on content. But at least they're clear restrictions. Adult is no go, and so are some other topics.
You should write the HP staff to find out why rather than assuming. Judging by your hubber score (77) you may have issues you need to address. There are lots of things that violate the TOS besides adult content and spamming.
I'll pass on Squidoo.
HP always gives someone time to correct there hub, I agree also with KCC contact the team directly and ask them why the hub was deleted. Was it duplicate or copied content from another site? If it was and you were not the writer the content can be deleted without warning. TOS is very clear on HP however many do not read the information. I am certain if you e-mail them they will straighten it all out and you will have a resolve. Squidoo does the same thing if it is duplicate or copied content you will find this site to be easier to work with then many others. Keep your head up and e-mail email@example.com
I don't see the hub you are referring to. You had one that was moderated but then cleared after corrections were made several months ago. Do you have multiple accounts?
Being overly promotional will also get your hub axed.
I once had a hub popped down for over promotion and when I looked at the hub and the Google TOS ... well ... I was possibly seconds from getting my Adsense account banned, and I'm thankful to the team for axing the hub before Adsense axed my account.
What most of you don't realize is that Google uses bots to travel your hubs and bots to determine what violates their TOS. This means you can't hide a violation from them forever. And when a Google bot says you did something bad there isn't usually a human committee giving that violation strong considerable thought.
This being the case, it is far better to have your hubs groomed by humans ... humans you can ask, 'What did I do wrong' and humans who will allow you a chance to fix it.
As an exercise, we should all google this: "google disabled my adsense". And when you do so you will be surprised at how quickly Adsense will disable your account ... and what exacly that means to your bottom line of income.
When Google TKOs your account, you DO NOT as a rule get your earned income. As such, whatever sits in your account is given up to them. Trust me ... that would suck for any of us who have worked hard and are nearing a payout.
So, which would you prefer? A slap on the wrist by HP or a loss of nearly $100 income and never being able to use Adsense again?
Trust me ... we should all be praising HP for doing everything they can to secure our Adsense accounts, as the Adsense TOS is a lot easier to violate than one might think.
I wrote up a whole hub on what was and wasn't acceptable by Google, and many of the things amazed even me.
Oh, and HP takes down the hub to stop the violation and this gives you a chance to email them to find out what is wrong, to mend it, and to put it back on line.
As I said, one of my previous hubs violated the Google TOS, and a quick email to the HP team gave me what I needed to mend it and put it back online - and it's made me money ever since.
Excellent post, worth highlighting.
When the HubPages team takes any action, they're doing it to protect our income and theirs. They're on our side!
Bottom line - If you don't like Adsense's rules, start your own blog and monetize it your own way. There are plenty of affiliate programs out there.
I'm planning to stay with Hubpages and Adsense, but anything that I want to say that isn't allowed, I plan to say elsewhere and get it indexed by means of advertising. Are there viable alternatives to Adsense that will help me get good page rank for my alternative content?
Advertising doesn't get your page indexed and won't do anything at all for your page rank - unless I've missed something.
The main Adsense-type alternative is Chitika.
There are lots of affiliate companies, you just need to find one that advertises products relevant to your subject. I found mine by googling things like "affiliate belly dance" or "affiliate dance".
Try companies like Commission Junction, Shareasale, Affiliate Future, LinkShare, Clickbank....
Have to agree with Marisa on this one, Aya - I don't run adverts on my business site, and it still gets picked up just fine. Only an opinion, but I think that if Google started prioritising sites that only carried Adsense, people would drift to other search engines, one area where there is some growing competition.
Another point - many internet gurus tell you not to put Adsense on your blog until it's doing well (for reasons to do with smart pricing), so clearly it's not considered an aid in getting your site ranked.
Is there growing competition in the area of search engines, Sufi? I was under the impression that Google had the market cornered.
I wouldn't say cornered - dominant, certainly, cornered, no. However, if it starts pushing customers away, Bing is slowly growing (although it is early days) and Yahoo could easily make a comeback. The way that Microsoft became complacent with Internet Explorer and lost a lot of ground to Firefox is a similar example - it took its dominance for granted.
Again, it is only my opinion, but I can't see why Google would spend a fortune on refining their search algorithms on the one hand, and then contradict that by prioritising sites carrying Adsense. My business site is PR4 and has no adverts
Page rank is measured from 0 to 10 - 0 is awful, 10 is amazing. A PR of 4 is pretty good, because the scale is (people think) logarithmic.
Google's algorithm works differently to Altavista, and professional webmasters spend a lot of time gaming the system to rank high in Google's algorithm. Academics and other people writing on "obscure" subjects probably aren't doing that, so they lose out on Google.
Remember the Google robots can't judge the quality of content, so they rely heavily on the "reputation" of each site (e.g. the number of other sites that link to it).
There isn't really much competition at the moment, but others do exist - so if people stopped getting reasonable results, there are places they would go.
I have never seen any suggestion that Google favours Adsense sites over others. Rumours start every now and then - for instance, there's a persistent rumour that "Google hearts Blogger" because it owns it, but anyone who has ever tried to start a Blogger blog will know it's no more likely to get noticed than any other blogging platform!
My favorite search engine is and always was Altavista. When I am looking for something obscure, Altavista will find it, while Google acts as if it doesn't exist. Why would that be, unless Google's algorithm somehow favors those things that sell over pure information?
Google makes money when people use Google. People will only come back when Google consistently finds them what they want.
Having Google ads does not guarantee that so I doubt that they even care about the ads on your site. They care about whether your site will please the searcher and give them a positive experience.
That is why Google is always tweaking their algorithm and is so harsh on those who try to use blackhat SEO techniques.
Thanks, Marisa. That's very useful information!
There's AdBrite too, similar to AdSense.
Trust me ... we should all be praising HP for doing everything they can to secure our Adsense accounts, as the Adsense TOS is a lot easier to violate than one might think.
true enough Yoshi
The strategy of posting objectionable content elsewhere and linking to it is also against Google Adsense Program Polices. This is their wording.
"Sites with Google ads may not include or link to:
Pornography, adult or mature content
Content related to racial intolerance or advocacy against any individual, group or organisation
Gambling or casino-related content
Illicit drugs and drug paraphernalia content
Sales of beer or hard alcohol
Sales of tobacco or tobacco-related products
Sales of prescription drugs
Sales of weapons or ammunition (e.g. firearms, firearm components, fighting knives, stun guns)
Sales of products that are replicas or imitations of designer goods
Sales or distribution of coursework or student essays
Content regarding programs which compensate users for clicking ads or offers, performing searches, surfing websites or reading emails
Any other content that is illegal, promotes illegal activity or infringes on the legal rights of others."
You never link to objectionable material. Your best bet is to place such material on a site and then link to your site (not the material) through your HP profile.
Your best bet is to have a front page that obeys all of Google's rules and link to that. In doing so, you will keep Google happy and be able to tell other hubbers about your site through your profile.
Aya - PR is Page Rank. A page rank of 4 means that Google sees it as a decent site.
As for the Altavista, I suspect that it may be comparing apples to oranges, as the two search engines use completely different methods to rank pages.
Not saying that you are wrong, because I have no idea about what goes on in the internet world - maybe one of the more savvy Hubbers can clear that one up.
EDIT: Marisa - you beat me too it!
by anime_nanet 12 years ago
SORRY I HAD TO CREATE ANOTHER FORUM THREAD AS MY ORIGINAL ONE WAS CLOSED TO REPLYS. I ALREADY HAVE THE FEEDBACK OF THE HHUBPAGES TEAM NOW I WANT THE OPPINION OF OTHER HUBPAGES USERS LIKE MYSELF..-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-MY HUB:The anime world has two designations that can sometimes be confusing...
by David Livermore 8 years ago
Let me preface this by stating I am not trying to be mean or a troll. In fact, I avoid the forums because I don't want to get involved. But with so many posts about the topics I'm about to discuss, I wanted to put in my two cents and to offer a reality check to old and new hubbers...
by Eric Dierker 8 years ago
There are actually some here that want more restrictions on what who can publish here!! They really want to hold back new artists and writers.Well excuse me Hitler's book burning Germany but no thank you. I grew up with Uncle Tom's Cabin banned.I grew up with Martin Luther King's work being...
by Kylyssa Shay 6 years ago
Only the best Hubs on HubPages are being moved to niches, so everything on the niche sites is spam free and trash free. There are no pieces written in broken English or written in ways that appear to be spun. Everything that's low quality is left behind. Even the ads are high-quality on the niche...
by Gemini Fox 7 years ago
Published a hub on Oklahoma (please don’t get started on how it might be too generic – I had fun doing it). It became the template for my following hubs on Arizona and New Mexico. The Oklahoma one published just fine. The Arizona and New Mexico ones are now Not Featured due to Quality....
by Jesusjohn78 12 years ago
Since hub pages loves to censor its writers at will while allowing other contributors to discuss the same topics I am wondering if anyone knows of better sites out there. Sites where i can still contribute my writing and monetize my writing like hub pages but with out all the BS censorship?
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|