ack. Is this good, or bad, or no big deal....?
Yes, I put on my noob hat.
One of my articles at Ezine is now posted on a really messed up site from Thailand. It's a food article, but the site's URL has "refinancing" in it. There are some others there from different article directories.
All of them have been through a spinner. Some are about financial stuff and others are about food stuff... but everything is all jumbled up.
Why would a site post articles in English but then spin them so they read like ESL? Doesn't that defeat the purpose? And why would you spin an article from Ezine anyway?
They included the resource box, so the link to my hub is still there.
so which answer fits:
A.) I don't care that my article reads like a thesaurus exploded all over it, because I have a link to my hub
B.) I don't want my name attached to this garbage, and the link is no good anyway because the site is so messed up.
I don't quite understand this well enough. Please fill in these blanks for me!
(My answer is A. Is that bad?)
Google knows we have no control over who links to us so, as long as you don't link back your fine.
They have violated ezines terms for publishing articles, but I don't think ezines has any clout to do anything. I questioned ezine once about this and they pretty much said I had to work it out with the site owner. As it was mentioned, the link is probably worth (less or nothing). It's one of those things that's not worth wasting much time with.
Show people say there is no such thing as bad publicity. It is a link-- maybe it will bring people who might not "normally" find you. Question is--will they click and buy?
I have no expertise in this area, but if it is making you feel itchy, it might be better to drop off their list.
Spinning - to avoid duplicate content. I would suspect it was translated several times, not spun - this is how auto-posters work nowadays.
A vs B - your call. I would go with A, but if you feel really bad about it - contact the owner with your concern, and 99% they will promptly remove your post. People who do that kind of thing usually don't want any hassle.
The backlink probably won't do you much good, as sites that do that don't usually have much pagerank/linkjuice. However, it's not doing you much harm either, since it's not a word-for-word duplicate, and in my experience it's impossible to get stuff taken down from those sites anyway.
This was exactly my thinking, except for one question... Since I put this article up on Ezine, I'm not sure how much control I would have over it anyway.
I didn't post it for a Pulitzer, I put it up there for the link. So, I don't care really about the horrible grammar. But, should I? It also links back to my own site (that's how I found this), where I publish under the exact same name. Does it matter that this makes me look like a hack?
Oh? Do share.
This isn't true, actually. A link from a domain Google regards as "bad" (a website with illegal downloads, for example) can hurt your search engine ranking.
I own such a software, and participate on support forums, so I sort of have the info from the other side. "What to do with removal request" question there is as frequent as "how can I increase my hubscore" question here
And the universal responce is - you don't want the problems, comply.
Just wondering if you have actually ever tested this theory? I have heard this argument so much and have never been able to prove it with my own testing.
I created two different sites in the same niche with unique content and coding. Did legitimate link building on both until they were ranked well. Then I spam linked the crap out of one of them and...... Nothing. It didn't drop, but it didn't help me a bit either.
This test was repeated a few times with the same results, and I know for a fact that some of the links that I generated were from "bad" sites in Googles eyes.
I just don't even think these kind of links are worth worrying about because the probably won't be in the G's index for long anyway.
go to www.backlinkwatch.com and put in your hub url.
It will show you the backlinks to your hub.
And to the poster. There is no such thing as a bad link.
I beg to differ, I know people who have had problems with content being deindexed after being linked to from an Adult site. It seems Google pays attention to negative attention, however unfair.
Don't think that the OP will have a problem though.
Yeah, the site doesn't strike me as dubious, just sloppy.
Also, it's less than three weeks old.
I seriously doubt it Ryan. I mean deindexing part. Likely there were other reasons, and backlinks were just a coincidence.
Ok. So whats to stop competitive internet marketers from bombing their opponents with links from porn sites to get them deindexed? If Google worked like that, there would be rampant competition killing each other in the SERPS
ohma - yahoo site explorer
google search commands
seo for firefox
seo quake is my preferred tool
yeah, I vote A -
I also vote C - not worth a single second more of your time to think about
I was just reading about a site which has stolen thousands of articles from Helium.com writers. The site is called EZineseekers.com. I checked and some of the articles Helium stole from me are posted there.
I haven't check for hubs yet.
MattCutts has fielded that question dozens of times.
Obviously if a link from a "bad" source was a negative, especially as negative as a deindex - you would just add your competitors links to a "bad" site.
Its pretty intuitive
Matt Cutts has confirmed that being in a bad link neighborhood won't hurt you as much unless the site becomes known for paid links.
In the last couple of years Google has really been cracking down on sites which offer paid links, and the stes that pay for links. Matt Cutts has confirmed this too!
Hi! No! Absolutely Not!
The content on your competitors belong to their sites NOT yours!
(that particular article which is published on your competitor's site)
In return, you get a back link.
If that back link comes from a higher PR or some rating other than PR...
(Google says more than 200 factors determine a sites ranking!!)
...then you get a fraction of rating from that link which depends on number of links on that particular page.
If the back link is from a bad SEO practitioner you will NOT be affected by it.
In short, it's not possible to damage a site's reputation by doing actions external to it.
( the actions have to be from - internal - the site)
The link won't hurt you, but it probably won't help you that much.. I keep finding all sorts of strange links that pop up when my articles and stuff appear in some very unexpected places... You can't control it so don't sweat it...
by Victoria Van Ness 10 days ago
What's the point in keeping us from linking to our own work in our articles? That's how we increase traffic to our articles!
by Earl Noah Bernsby 4 years ago
Hey gang! *'Leave it to Beaver' music playing in background*As per melbel's advice on this Hub:http://melbel.hubpages.com/hub/Backlinks-HubsI decided to implement some of my new-fangled SEO learnin' by writing for EzineArticles.com. I just wondered if any ringers had some tips or...
by Amber Slater 6 months ago
This may seem like a silly question, but I was wondering:I am currently working on getting a Website up and running, and the purpose will basically be to have a portfolio online. Am I able to essentially copy and past my own articles, or link them somehow (I am learning here lol!) without rocking...
by LondonGirl 9 years ago
I've read over and over the "get quality backlinks with Qassia" line.Is it true? Do links from this site help?How do you do it? I know you write the "intel", but where does the backlink link to? Your profile? Or can you change it to different hubs each time?
by kirstenblog 8 years ago
I posted my first article to 411 article and wonder what others who have tried it have found it? I take it that the article you publish with them can be used by web master or blogger etc. who need content and that they include your signature with a back link to your other sites, blogs or articles...
by Brie Hoffman 7 years ago
I just did and found a bunch of places that have my articles...they all give me credit but I never knew that they existed before. Are these considered backlinks?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|