I have some content that is pretty hard hitting. It is accurate and it is substantial. When I see a PR of 0 for this content it makes me think that there is a problem with the whole idea. Is there simply too much content out there now? And people are spinning articles and the like. Do we have to be spinners? I am beginning to think yes.
PR has no relation to the quality of content, it is merely a numerical value calculated by PR of inbound links - a deduction for outbound links.
The good news is that quality content is MUCH more important than PR for getting your work noticed by search engines
" it is merely a numerical value calculated by PR of inbound links - a deduction for outbound links."
like to explain this ? - numbered value by Page rank of inbound links - a deduction of of outbound links ?
" quality content is MUCH more important than PR for getting your work noticed by search engines "
why ? how ? i thought Google cant tell whats good content and whats not .. apart from keyword use and associated keywords - after that, other measurement factors have to be employed , because Google cant judge good content by assessing the message the sense of the meaning of the post, like human reader can ? thats why these problems exist.
Bgamall, your content may be hard-hitting but it's also topical. You're up against news sites and financial sites with huge clout, whose sites have enormous credibility with Google. So their results are always going to get presented to searchers long before yours.
If you're always on the back pages of Google, you will never get much traffic. And even if you did, what does someone want to buy if they're searching for articles on the Tea Party? Nothing. They're looking for opinion, so they have no motive to click on your ads.
There is way too much rubbish in the best niches, but just be patient and sooner or later Google will come up with something to identify all the spun rubbish.
There are plenty of niches left, 90% of people are only writing about weight loss, acai berries or forex trading.
i will go over and have a look at your hubs..... hard hitting is a good.
No it's not. If you don't merchandize and promote content, you could be screwed by the time your content rises to the top naturally.
Case in point - high quality real estate sites, built on the perception that the market was hot and would remin a good investment. Not only did the premise change, but all the content about qualifying and getting a mortage, credit etc.
You gotta catch a niche fast or it disappears, or your competition beats you out.
good on you Nellie. I like hard hitting " realism "
" No it's not.( hard hitting is good ). If you don't merchandize and promote content, you could be screwed by the time your content rises to the top naturally "
direct and well said .. however, some content can tend to be more evergreen than " real Estate " markets
That's in hindsight. I doubt if you would have said that seven years ago. What retirement planning - that's been turned over completely as well.
Nutrition? Big study just came out yesterday that calcium supplements are bad for a women's heart.
Hormone Replacement Therapy the standard of treating menopausal symptoms for over a decade. How many sites were set up touting that and had to come down
Vegetarian low-fat diets are now second to MUFA the right fat diets in nutrition studies.
I can't think of one popular "evergreen topic" that has stood the test of time. The only people touting this strategy now are the gurus who want to make money teaching others how to make money. Everyone who really makes money on the net in affiliate marketing, knows that passive income is a joke.
I've made a great living in affiliate marketing for 10 years, and I know how much time it takes every day and how much things change every day.
very nice information, thanks a lot for this one.
i wasn't thinking of any of those .. i was thinking of if one wrote a review of a film, or a book .. not much to be made from it though.
there's gold in your comments Nelle, cause of your depth of experience.
I tried to craft a reply to this last night but I was too tired.
Content is king, but as others have pointed out, your content is just a little Post-it note in a mountain of paper.
You seem to want to write about politics. Given good writing, time and a little luck, you could be moderately successful at that. But it will take many more hubs, much more time and - again - some luck.
I have a niche site that is thirteen years old, has approximately 7,000 posts on it, gets a quarter million page views per month, mostly from Google and it earns about $1,000 a month from ads.
That's all. It's a tough business. Content is king, but the king doesn't always have a gold crown.
Hi Pcunix, does this mean the older the site and the posts and good articles on it, the more it will ripen and be likened by google more than content?
What site makes money depends on the competition it faces and the current google algorithm. Your online portfolio has to be diversified so that something always hits right. I've had crap sites that have done better than quality sometimes. Sometimes the age of the site matters, sometimes it doesn't.
Google has no way to asses quality content, so if you want to get all your traffic from them then quality content is not enough on its own - you also have to make it search engine optimized and it has to be on topics where you aren't competing directly with multi-billion pound media empires like Marissa says.
But if you don't want to do that, then quality content can get traffic from other places, such as building up a readerships from hubbers and from social media sites.
People are increasingly finding online content though friends rather than search engines, particularly certain types of content such as news and politics related stuff. Maybe you should focus on this instead of google.
True kiigeorge, I view content in terms of the revenue stream it generates over time. You're right in that a review of Shakespeare is timeless.
However if you were monetizing it trying to sell a paper book, then that would have to be changed to an e-reader, with a note that Shakespeare can now be downloaded for free!)
Nelle and Kephrira
just want to say im quickly becoming a fan of each of you.
Your right on the nail each time.
My heavy content pieces drift to the front page of Google in 3 to 6 months depending on the level of competition. Once they are there they get read and they stay there.
Alas I have not found the trick of writing about Neighbours, The Simpsons, Beyonce and Madonna - otherwise my earnings would be significantly better.
Do it for the writing, not the score. which artcles do you read if you do a google search on a serious subject? I go right past all e-how articles and most hub articles. they are crap and written by people who have no knowledge of the subject and don't do any research. They just pick a topic and speak off the cuff. Accuracy is not only secondary, it is most of the times non-existent.
So write to write well and the google rank will come.
by Chuck Bluestein 5 years ago
Earlier I posted that people should go and make links going to other sites that do not belong to you nofollow. Then someone mentioned that if your hubber score is less than 85 then "every link" will be nofollow. But this is not what HubPages says. HubPages says:"If your HubberScore...
by RanaKm 4 years ago
So, I've had a hub unpublished due to HP claiming that it's overly promotional.The hub only has 2 outbound links ( which is the number of links we're allowed to put for the other external sites ) this is the only thing that I'm having in my hub.There is also NO amazon products or Ebay or...
by Dr. John Anderson 3 years ago
"John Mueller said that external links, links on your web site that point to outside web sites (or outbound links) are not a ranking signal. Just to be clear, links are a ranking factor - but you linking out to other sites doesn't help you rank better. He said the content you use for the link...
by Paul Edmondson 3 years ago
Hi Hubbers, I mentioned in the past that we've been working with a company that helps identify SEO issues. Many of the issues they identify come in the form of penalties which they believe hurt the entire site. We've been trying to look at these penalties and come up with solutions that...
by Ellen Brundige 4 years ago
I've got the "Overly Promotional" red skull of doom on my top trafficked hub.Naturally it was the first one I edited. The affiliate links and "overly promotional" warnings at the top of the hub went away in the workshop. I republished it last night, and it's still published...
by Liz Elias 4 years ago
I just signed up to try it out...and cannot find this information in their very abbreviated "learning center."Are outbound links allowed in bubbles?
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|