I'm not sure if I have mentioned this before here, so: it would REALLY help if we got feedback on stuff we flag - if only on the stuff that admins decide does NOT warrant action. Many times I have been hesitant to flag because I'm not sure - just a little feedback would make me much more confident and ultimately more helpful!
My understanding of this is, that flagging should not affect the flagger in any way, unless someone is routinely putting flags on opinions they personally disagree with.
I am not an avid flagger and I don't care if my flags are receiving "action", I'm just giving an opinion on something that the staff may want to look at.
You missed my point. I'm not looking for "action", I'm looking to better undersand what should be flagged and what should not. I may seem very clear to you which articles should be looked at, but it is not to me.
I agree with you. I flagged two things the other day and was a little hesitate because I might have been a prude.
One was a bevy of lovely ladies from playboy and another was a site so gory with blood, I felt ill.
But it might just be me. I flagged them anyway. My deciding point was that I wouldn't want a child to see it.
So on my last hubhopping, I flagged a good number of hubs that were short, pointless and of little use to anyone. In my opinion, of course.
But do they meet HP TOS? I DO NOT KNOW. We have the explanation:
Is very short, contains a large number of broken links or videos, or consists of unoriginal, nonsensical, difficult to read, or purely personal content
How short is "very short"? How "unoriginal" is unoriginal? How personal is personal - and on that note, I see many, many very personal hubs that I would NEVER flag.
That's why feedback would be helpful. Did I waste staff time looking at the hubs I flagged or was it helpful? If I had even just the negative feedback, just "No, that one is fine but thank you anyway", I'd have more to go on on the next round of hopping.
I suppose I could keep a manual list and check back in a few weeks to see if the hub is improved or deleted, but that is work I don't need.
When the HubPages staff thinks they get too much work from bad flagging, they will quickly make things clearer to us by providing more documentation. Until then we could err on the side of caution and flag. It would be good if they explained it to us but perhaps not enough people are flagging to drown them with too much work.
At the very least, I would like to see a page in the 'my account' section where I can see the latest things that I have flagged. I want to see what happened to them. I don't really need feedback on every flag action, like a message written by a HubPages staff member, but just by looking at what action they have taken I can review whether I'm flagging properly.
Also, that gives me an idea how fast the HubPages staff responds. I flagged some stuff days ago that is clearly a duplicate content violation but it is still online...
I trust HubPages admin and wouldn't want to make vacuous extra work for them by demanding that they get back to me on every little thing I flag for them.
The size of the team and the volume they handle doesn't make this practical at all.
Duplicate content is allowed-- if it is yours. I have a couple of hubs that are duplicates of my own original work that is on another site. I might have a lower hubscore than I would otherwise have on them, but I wanted them here. It is not something I do often, but a few hurt nothing.
But HubPages does not like it, even when the content is yours, so effectively it is not allowed because your scores are penalized.
The case I was talking about concerns multiple people and the hub author is most certainly not the author of the copied content.
I think that what happens between a hubber and the HP team is sort of, well, personal. If you were to complain about a rude customer service rep somewhere, the company won't divulge to you what happens from that complaint, and it's the same kind of theory here.
IMHO, the best solution would be to have HP put up some dummy articles as samples of what we should flag.
I would tend to agree with you, but the simple act of flagging already makes it personal.
I don't see how what Simon suggests makes it any more so. Just a simple list of the hubs we flagged - then we could look for ourselves to see if anything happened. If we see that nothing ever changes, then we know we're being too harsh. If everything we flag disappears or has plainly been improved, we may not be being hard enough.
I could keep such a list myself, of course and I guess I probably should.
by BenjaminB 7 years ago
I find it hilarious that Hubpages pushes the concept of helping new Hubbers yet my Hub which has had very good reception by the community has been flagged for being both overly promotional and substandard.I had 5 social bookmarking links,and 2 other links to free tools absolutely related to the...
by Mikeydoes 7 years ago
In light of the Google algo change, it is now obvious and confirmed that hub-hopping is VERY important. I feel that if you publish here, you should hub hop when you can. As it should hopefully increase our revenue and hopefully take this hubpages back to the top, where it belongs.The problem is...
by NaomiR 8 years ago
If we flag a hub, does it say which hubber put in the flag, or is it anonymous. I mean, could someone turn around and flag your hub to retaliate? How does it work exactly? Thanks.
by Tony Lawrence 7 years ago
See http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/68780#post1504935I read the post, read his profile and then his first two hubs,It's OBVIOUS he didn't write them and if you copy the first paragraphs from them and paste them into Google you will immediately find the real owners.Yet there is NOTHING under the...
by DK 5 years ago
This forum is a place for you to post hubs that you think are clearly of low quality and need flagging. Committed hubbers should follow this forum and check these hubs posted for quality when they have the time. If a hub has been clearly copied (for example from a PDF file that the plagiarism...
by Sherri 7 years ago
The question of whether poetry Hubs should have 400-word minimums came up in this thread a few minutes ago:http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/70203#post1528809I've been puzzling about what to do with poetry Hubs I've found while hopping. I haven't flagged any of them, because poetry is a unique...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|