Okay, you have a better idea? Let's hear it! No complaining, no bitching, no justifying, just plain honest suggestions to help staff deal with all the issues that have come up since Google turned the world upside down. Don't need a lot of minutae. Let staff winnow thru the chaff and see if there is anything they can use.
Help them help us. In a courteous manner. It will pay off in many ways.
It would be awesome to have ten hubs approved by admin before newbies get to automatically publish hubs .. would save admin a lot of headache later Great post.. I am pretty appreciate of all their hard work
Great suggestion, sofs. We've definitely discussed that option - it would take more manpower than we currently have, but it is certainly something to keep in mind.
What we've done in the meantime is made it impossible to publish Hubs that violate some of our easier-to-track rules, and embedded more helpful tips and warnings in the HubTool.
But perhaps this is something we would consider for the future
Simone, the biggest complaint from Hubbers is that we're getting good, successful Hubs unpublished for minor violations, while large numbers of really bad Hubs are still out there.
We're told the reason is that moderators haven't got to them yet.
So the fundamental thing that needs to be done, is to review the moderating process so priority is given to finding and removing the awful stuff.
1. New Hubs that receive a flag are moderated first.
2. Low-scoring Hubbers and low-scoring Hubs are moderated first.
The other thing is to encourage established Hubbers to bring their Hubs into compliance, before the need for moderation arises. This means making sure they are aware of the rules as they currently stand, which is not the case right now. For instance, I made a fuss to get the RSS feeds and tags rules clarified, but there has never been an announcement - just an updating of existing documents, and how do Hubbers who've already read them, know they have to go back and read them again?
So I'd say - an education program, by email or by announcements, to ensure all Hubbers understand the rules AND the fact that they're retrospective (I've seen a few Hubbers comment that they only apply to new Hubs!!).
You are welcome Simone!
I feel that staff and writers can benefit by sensible discourse driven by the desire to improve the quality for all involved.
1st-No more additional rules added until the existing rule changes or the stronger enforcement of existing rules are 100% completed.
2nd-Hub Staff and Moderators completely focus time on completing the issues with Hubpages before working on creating and adding "bells-n-whistle" or social features.
I agree Michael, the bells and whistles can wait til the basics are ironed out.
Some great suggestions here already! Hopefully more are forthcoming. Pretty sure staff will be willing to implement the best ones.
I think Michael brought up some good issues. Also, define the vague terms used so that writers have a better understanding of what the rules are, especially when they are contantly changing. Violation of a "misleading tag" doesn't say a whole lot and wastes a ton of time trying to figure it out when a simple clarification would save all parties a lot of headache.
Funny thing though that Simone would respond to this thread but no others. Just saying
If hubs using very bad English (I'm not talking the once in a while typo either) are going to receive high scores and get featured (makes HP look bad the minute Anyone comes here because the featured ones hit you right away) then I don't see a lot of it. But I think the minor violations causing hubs to get unpublished, especially for those here a long time, should stop too. I think many hubbers are getting tired of the inconsistency of being dinged for violations while major ones go undetected. Maybe someone to give answers to hubbers who need help, in a more timely fashion, would lead to less discouragement too. Many understand this ironing out thing to make HP better, is not an easy task for staff. But some still go to other sites to write until all is worked out. How many hubs can be dinged before a writer gets fed up is an individual tolerance threshold.
I would also like to see hubs coded in a different color if there is a warning on them .. we do not usually check all our hubs everyday... the color code will make us aware of the warning posted on the hub.
That would help many hubbers I guess.
I think we're getting off topic.
Bumping to see if anyone else has constructive suggestions to improve as suggested by the OP.
remove heads from ....sand, yeah sand.
Really, its too late - but the suggestion to work towards would have been to create a traditional support ticket system.
Hub gets unpublished and then gets a higher priority to a response. The excuse that its "not manageable" and randomly quoting author figures doesn't fly, make it work, make it happen, excuses are for children.
They dont have as many active authors as they claim - if they ran IP comparisons, whittled out all the proxies and public servers for dupe spam accounts, regular spam accounts, legitimate dupe accounts and abandoned accounts, the author base number wouldnt be that impressive.
Figure out how many hubs can be moderated in a workday and never unpublish more than can receive proper support. Dont unpublish prior to a weekend if you are to be shortstaffed.
Also, offer apologies and an increased revenue share for a bonus period as a symbolic gesture for the mishandling.
I'm aware that hubpages are already looking into this, but thought I'd mention it here too. It would be brilliant if hubpages had a storage/hosting place for files such as pdf files etc.x
Perhaps the staff would consider engaging any willing Hubbers who have a bit of time, to do the screening of hubs that have been flagged, rather than just hub-hopping and flagging, and leaving the dirty work to the over-burdened staff.
In other words, giving a select number of responsible Hubbers the authority to fully assess questionable hubs in much the same way the staff already does.
This would lighten the load on the staff, and would get the garbage pile whittled down much faster, and keep it to a minimum thereafter. This would help the whole community, I think.
by Paul Edmondson 4 years ago
I've been doing a lot of thinking about the types of services we offer Hubbers and how to help Hubbers improve.A few services that have been suggested- grammar and spell checking- suggesting edits- providing images/media upon request- formatting help (breaking hubs into multiple text capsules,...
by Kate Swanson 7 years ago
Whether I agree with HP's new policies or not, I respect the site's right to set their own rules. However, I think one of the reasons Hubbers are getting upset isthey're getting warnings based on rules they don't know existExamples:1. I have "overly promotional" warnings on several...
by Sporty 8 years ago
It would appear that hubpages have become too big now as they are making a lot of money and have suddenly decided to start behaving like Google and eBay, ignoring the hubbers who are at the base of their success.I think hubpages should learn a lesson from eBay and stop behaving like Google.Recently...
by ryankett 8 years ago
May I suggest a new operational feature? I propose that unpublished content, in other words URLs that have been grabbed and stored for future use, should have to be used (in other words, published on) within 6 months of being taken.If somebody holds a URL for 6 months it should be taken and put...
by Carolee Samuda 4 years ago
http://hubpages.com/faq/#HubPro-BetaHubPages editors will:Proofread for spelling and grammar mistakesUpdate the information in HubsImprove layout and structureAdd supplementary capsulesObtain high-quality media assets (illustrations)Remove unrelated links and productsFact checkCommunicate with...
by Lily Rose 7 years ago
I thought I read the new rules about word count and Amazon links, etc. and I put in the time to fix every single hub that was on the list that HP emailed me. Apparently some hubs didn't make the list and now I'm getting about 2 emails a day telling me that a hub of mine was unpublished for...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|