Do you Google Plus your own hubs?

Jump to Last Post 1-12 of 12 discussions (23 posts)
  1. Dorsi profile image88
    Dorsiposted 12 years ago

    I was just wondering....I really don't get this feature yet. I guess it's sort of like "liking" something on Facebook? I know it's supposed to help Google rate our writing. Is it OK to ask readers to click our Google plus sign if they enjoyed the hub?

    1. Hollie Thomas profile image60
      Hollie Thomasposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I'm sure I read or heard somewhere that this isn't a good idea. I think it may have on a podcast but I'm not sure.

    2. kannanwrites profile image92
      kannanwritesposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Absolutely No.

      I think pluses should come naturally and organically. And Google Plus still has a long way to go as far as general viewers understandably goes.

  2. mulberry1 profile image85
    mulberry1posted 12 years ago

    I wouldn't Google Plus my own hubs. I don't know much about it, but I would think over time it would become quite evident to Google and I doubt they would look at that positively.  In general, they don't want us try to "game the system". They want pages to rise to the top naturally.

    Again, I have little to no knowledge on the topic, that's just my take on it.

  3. Stacie L profile image85
    Stacie Lposted 12 years ago

    Well I started using Google + recently and made that faux pas of +ing one of my hubs,just like I do on FB. I didn't realize this was considered bad taste.roll

  4. Lisa HW profile image62
    Lisa HWposted 12 years ago

    I'd never do it.  I'm really "stingy" when it comes to what I'll Plus one.  I've read that there's a way someone's Plus one's are "paid attention to" (by the system), and if someone wildly Plus one's stuff their "vote" won't count as much to Google.  I just assume Step 1 may be that someone's vote won't count as much.  Step 2 could be that Google's system might take the person's overall approach to their Internet doings less seriously too.  I think "bad taste" is the least of the problems (according to what I've read).  I just don't know whether there's really that Step 2 or whether the negative consequences stop at the Step 1. 

    Separate issue, but I haven't done any posting of anything on the Google+ profile, so yesterday I thought I'd do a few.  (I haven't known what I'm doing on there for the most part).  Anyway, I posted a few without anything happening.  All of a sudden when I posted one to a page I really do think is worthwhile, some notice popped up, "That was a good post."  I don't know if it was the link or the length of words, or some combination of thing; but (in spite of Google' apparent "approval" of it) I suddenly felt particularly "monitored".   hmm  I'm not complaining.  It's fine, I suppose.  Still, the immediate "noticing thing" made it clear their system is paying close attention (and immediately).  hmm  Maybe that kind of notice is only new to me because I don't use social sites.    (I do know that Yahoo Answers does the immediate-notice thing when you have an answer that "seems to have a lot of punctuation in it".  lol  )  My main point is that they're definitely monitoring a lot of little stuff people are doing.

    1. Aficionada profile image81
      Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Wow.  That's actually a bit spooky, isn't it?

      I have read the same thing as you, Lisa.  I have read that the authority of our +1 can be upgraded or downgraded because of the things we +1.  I think that some of the authority comes from our choice of quality.  For example, if a high percentage of our +1's goes to articles and posts from known, authoritative sources (NYT, WSJ, Slate mag, WebMD, for example), that will raise the value or authority of each +1 that we give. 

      If most of our +1's go to everyday things (our friends' posts, their articles, our own articles), that will downgrade the value of our +1.  (And I do think that the Step 2 that you mentioned is correct:  someone who indiscriminately gives out +1's will not be taken very seriously by Google as a writer or poster.)

      I think that it works (in a vague way) as a percentage.  That is, where does the balance of this person's +1 recommendations trend?

      I'm curious:  what sort of post did you make that was commended?  (I guess everyone who reads this will try to copy it, LOL!)

      1. Lisa HW profile image62
        Lisa HWposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        It was a post to a site that, when I ran into it, wasn't even clear about what it is (at least to me).  It was some person's article/report/paper on the brain development of babies.   I've often referred to it it (made a separate "thing" about it on one of my child-related blogs ages ago), and why I've always thought it stood out is that it's written in a professional way (complete with science references and images), but it's aimed at a "general" reader.  Oh..  and I guess it's not a "money type site", so maybe that had something to do with it.

        So, I've always included that when there's any link-posting to be done.  When I did it on the Google profile I did add a few lines about how I thought a lot of parents might appreciate it and how it's easy-to-understand.  I've dabbled in Facebook and some other social-type sites, and I'm new with Google profile thing; so I thought maybe I was getting a first taste of how things are done on such sites.  It was kind of startling and creepy, though.   lol

        In any case, it certainly struck me as a new kind of reminder that (imagine a robot voice here:) "we-must-stay-on-the-straight-and-narrow-at-all-times-now".   lol

  5. profile image58
    laptop-coolerposted 12 years ago

    The Google Web Quality team actually recommends you like your own stuff.  Of course you can always separate what you do and do not want to know about so that you direct Google in the direction you want.

    1. Aficionada profile image81
      Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      That's good to know, l-c.  Do you have a link for that, so we can get more information?

    2. Aficionada profile image81
      Aficionadaposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      These more recent posts have clarified the HP position, no matter what the Google Web Quality team may have said (or may have meant).

  6. Dorsi profile image88
    Dorsiposted 12 years ago

    It would be really nice to get HubPages take on the google plus thing. Some direction on whether it's a good or bad thing to google plus your own hubs. I liken it to marketing your articles and if Google does not frown on it then I think it's a good thing. I mean,hey,we should "like" what we have written, right?

    I think people are spooked about using it because they are likening it to clicking on a google ad (which is a no no on our own stuff). But I think Google Plus is an entirely different animal, and they are looking at the overall user.

    Anyone from HubPages like to comment on this? It would be very helpful!

    1. Lisa HW profile image62
      Lisa HWposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      They ARE two different things, and I agree that some "official word" from HubPages, specifically about Plus One-ing our own stuff, would be good.  Even if that happened (or has happened but we've missed it), I'm not sure I want to trust what I do to the "official word" of anyone/anything but my own instincts and any impressions I've gotten from reading different stuff about Google's overall aims these days.

      As much as I think of HubPages and like and respect this site, they're not in the business of safeguarding whatever "relationship" I establish/don't establish between my writing and Google.  What was "official word" on here about what people should do with their Hubs was un-done by Google not long ago.  It wasn't HP's fault, but I do think people have to use their own judgment when it comes to safeguarding their individual "reputation" in Google's "eyes" (at least if they hope to get Google traffic and/or be paid by Google).

      BUT, I do agree that "official word" that offered some sound, informed, guidance would be good.  smile  My instinct is that they (Google) would care far less if we mess up with what we do on the Google+ profile (up to a point) than what we do as far as encouraging search engines to more highly view a page goes.

    2. Robin profile image87
      Robinposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Dorsi!  In addition to the forum post, Jason also wrote a Learning Center article about this a few weeks ago. … d-Google-1

      Thanks for bringing the topic up; it's an important one!

      1. Dorsi profile image88
        Dorsiposted 12 years agoin reply to this

        Thank you Robin. Yes, I think this will be very important to understand because I think this plus one thing is going to be a big deal with Google.

  7. Lisa HW profile image62
    Lisa HWposted 12 years ago

    Again, separate (but related in a way) matter from Plus One-ing:

    I noticed yesterday that on my Google profile they'd divided links into categories that hadn't previous been there.  Now there's "Other Profiles", "Contributor To", and "Recommended".  Some of my stuff had been moved from the previous "main" category to others. Before that I had only listed to "any site where I write" but not the individual pages.  (They also have the thing, "this page is specifically about me" when you're creating the link in "edit", so I figured that took care of what's a profile and what's a "main site".)

    Yesterday when I saw they'd moved some of my own stuff to "recommended" I assumed that's where people can post their own links to individual pieces of writing (which is what they did with some of my stuff that's a one-shot deal but that I'd added when I was "confessing everything" about everything I have anywhere.

    So now (and particularly considering what laptop-cooler has said), I'm wondering if what they mean is to recommend our own best writing on the profile - not necessarily Plus One our own stuff???  (Of course, I don't pretend not to be clueless when it comes to what we're supposed to be doing/not doing these days as far as Google stuff goes.  smile  )

  8. 2uesday profile image66
    2uesdayposted 12 years ago

    This may be worth reading it seems relevant to this forum post.

    1. 2uesday profile image66
      2uesdayposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      I think this is a HubPages take on it.

    2. rebekahELLE profile image85
      rebekahELLEposted 12 years agoin reply to this

      yes, I remember reading when it was first posted that it wasn't a good idea to plus our own hubs.

  9. profile image0
    Wentworth35posted 12 years ago

    I once googled one of my fairy tales, and discovered it on a Russian site, which I have never used, so have no idea how it got on there.

  10. Sunshine625 profile image87
    Sunshine625posted 12 years ago

    Yes....and tweet them and facebook them too smile

  11. Wayne Tully profile image64
    Wayne Tullyposted 12 years ago

    Once or twice but then I plus others stuff mainly that I like more!

  12. AEvans profile image74
    AEvansposted 12 years ago

    I Google + but I am still trying to figure out how to link my account to it. sad Its nuts! But I don't Google my own work.


This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at:

Show Details
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the or domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)