I fallow amid Shingal in G+ and I got this post:
"Amit Singhal - 3:44 PM - Public
We just rolled out a huge improvement to our ranking system that makes Google search results really really fresh. This change improves about 35% of Google searches. Yes! You read that right -- 35%.
Official Google Blog: Giving you fresher, more recent search results"
I didn't fogure out hou to do the link to the post...
however, it has a link to a post inBlogger as well
http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/ … earch.html
It is going to be interesting, my opinion.
The posts says that it impacts 35% of the results, not improves. I think Google would consider it a success if it improved something like 20% of the 35%, even if it made the remaining 15% worse.
I agree with you.
However, the post in G+ speaks about "improvement". Perhaps I should have used the quotation marks.
But what how would these changes impact our accounts?
Should we start making "news" like hubs. I don't know. My account is already in a deep sink. But somehow I still hope in a miracle to bring it back. Any suggestions from HP staff will be very appreciated.
My first thought is that news websites and blogs will be favored by this algorithm tweak for news, current events, and trending topics. Those sites' stated purpose is to deliver current posts, current news, the latest blah blah blah. Their site architecture and navigation is built around a filing system of documents organized by dates, oldest to most recent.
Whereas on a site like Hubpages, date-of-publish is not a prominent part of each article, nor is the website's navigation structure organized chronologically. So I would think that this might hurt one's chances of getting topical, trending, news-related hubs to the top of search results; other sites will have a slight Google edge. Not impossible, but it's likely to be a handicap for us.
Whereas evergreen topics and topics that are not so time-sensitive would not be impacted by this change at all. The definitive guide to playing cribbage is still the definitive guide to playing cribbage. The definitive guide to Britney Spear's tattoos will probably be obsolete by next week when she adds another.
The option "latest" absolutely allows you to sort someone's Hubs into chronological order, and even indicates a rough date of publication.
Thank you very much for the heads up. I saw/concluded something from that link that is going to keep me busy for days...
if google is giving fresh information first then updating our hubs with new information should be enough?
by And Drewson 7 years ago
Here's an interesting message from Seekyt, which mentions Hub Pages fondly."Important DecisionMake sure you've read the news to the right before reading this paragraph. ---->There is always a way to get around these things; however, do we really want to "get around it" and try to...
by Eugene Brennan 3 months ago
According to Search Engine Roundtable, it seems there was another update this week. I notice traffic has dropped a further 20% to 30% on at least two of my high traffic articles.Has anyone else noticed changes?
by Paul Goodman 6 years ago
Looks like Google made another algo change earlier this week. My traffic rose about 25% on my main HP account around this time, so I'm guessing the update was the cause. My traffic is still low by historical standards (down by more than a third from the start of the year), but I...
by Muttface 3 years ago
Just wondering how your day is going so far? I haven't noticed an avalanche of rabid ESL teachers desperately seeking lesson plans yet. My numbers are stable, perhaps it's too early to tell yet.
by Lalulinho 7 years ago
Any sense at how Google's war against content farms will affect Hubpages?http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/02/2 … -sites/?hpObviously there is a huge difference between the quality of most hubs and answers.com or eHow.com. I guess it is quite early to know, given that even pages...
by R-J-T 7 years ago
http://www.sistrix.com/blog/985-google- … ality.htmlAfter seeing this on another thread I have decided to post it here as I think it deserves its own thread, sorry if it has already got its own thread. Anyway after looking at the results after the google change from the link above things do...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|