To my alarm, I received a notification that my Hub was in violation for having duplicate content. I knew it couldn't be since I worked long and hard on the Hub and since I have been writing on the web for 5 years and never had such an accusation made. When I investigated, I found that my article was published on another site verbatum. I contacted the site and to my surprise, they quickly removed the article. I am now waiting for this article to be repulished by HP.
Here is my concern: HP needs to find a different way of dealing with these issues that does not involve penalizing innocent writers whos work is being plagerized. Instead of removing the hub, they could send a message and give the hubber a chance to respond. It is very hurtful to be accused of plagerizing only to find out that you are the victim.
Equally concerning is the fact that I lose income while my hub remains unpublished especially in this case where the hub is related to New Year's eve and was doing quite well when it was pulled. Very frustrating. My Hub is still unpublished and it took about 5 minutes for the other wesite to take action on my plagerized hub on New Years eve when most sites are not manned.
It was published on the 29th flagged on the 31st. It is still unpublished. I think I will simply remove and publish elsewhere. Soo frustrating!
Well, maybe someone copied your article and posted it elsewhere and HP filters just happened to find it. The thing is, two articles with the same content being published so close together is going to send up alarm bells. Within two days HP finds another content exactly like yours is going raise questions.
You also have to understand that this is a holiday weekend so maybe it might take a little longer to get response from HP..
You need to understand that HP did not accuse you of plagiarizing; it accused you of having a hub that was a duplicate of another article somewhere else. As you note, they were correct in that assessment.
It is unfortunate that the automated filters will never be perfect, but it is also true. Others have reported the same mishap, and although HP has stated that they try hard to avoid this circumstance but it is unfortunately inevitable that a handful of mistakes will happen.
It is also very unfortunate that it had to happen on a holiday weekend as it is going to take longer for a person to take action. With the amount of thievery going on it is not possible for a human to look at every copied hub and those few people are out of contact for a few days.
Perhaps HP would consider deactivating the filters on long weekends to help the situation somewhat? How about it HP?
Hang in there, Joan - it will be resolved as quickly as possible and obviously in your favor. HP has shown in the past that as soon as someone can actually get to it and look, the hubs are quickly republished.
by Lisa Vollrath 3 years ago
Why those of us moving over from Squidoo should not try to transfer our lenses to HubPages manually:I just moved one of my recipes that's fairly new, and doesn't have a high search engine ranking, thinking I would use it as a way to become familiar with the HubPages tools. I deleted the Squidoo...
by Eric Dockett 3 years ago
I don't go around looking for Hubs to flag, but when I come across something with glaring issues I try to be a good HP citizen and alert staff. They have, after all, continuously preached about the importance of qualityLast week I flagged two Hubs with major issues. The kinds of issues that make a...
by eirevet 2 years ago
Hi all, I have just had my first experience of having a hub unpublished, and have been given a duplicate content notification. It's a hub I was very happy with, as the structure and content came very naturally, and was genuinely written entirely out of my own head. I find the duplicate content...
by Heather Edgens 5 years ago
So, I understand I can't publish any content on here that I have used for another site. But can I publish on here first, then carry those articles over to another site? Is that allowed? Cause on the other sites I write for allow me to republish content on them... Also, I read that the hubs are...
by Sherri 7 years ago
The question of whether poetry Hubs should have 400-word minimums came up in this thread a few minutes ago:http://hubpages.com/forum/topic/70203#post1528809I've been puzzling about what to do with poetry Hubs I've found while hopping. I haven't flagged any of them, because poetry is a unique...
by lifeboost 6 years ago
Hi there One of my hubs has been unpublished, and it says it's because there's duplicate text, but I don't know which part is duplicate? I've written it all myself, and I've just done a "plagiarism check" to be sure that someone else hasn't copied and pasted my writing elsewhere, but it's...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|