I have posted several questions recently as I try to decide if I will write "for" the HUB or write and post on my own domain site.
I can see pros and cons for both. Hence my reason for asking several questions the past few days.
I have also been trying to answer a lot of my questions on my own by reading other posts in the forum. Which leads me to my next question.
With the recent changes here at hub is the income potential still here that I read about in 2011?
I used caps for the word INCOME in my subject line, as I am seeking ways to create income not fun money
When I heard about the hub in 2011 and came over and did a lot of reading it seemed to be a possible source for that goal. However now I am questioning it as of everything I am reading from members since the changes have been put into practice.
Opinions & Thoughts Please
Most people just say hubpages. The HUB sounds like some centre of evil in a sci fi novel.
But yes you can make money. And the various changes over the last year favor good writers.
The term paralysis by analysis comes to mind, we all spend too long trying to decide what is the best decision rather than getting on and actually doing something.. You can make money on HP, your own sites and a host of other sites; all have their pros and cons but the best thing to do is just jump in and start somewhere rather than worrying for weeks over which will be the best...
Write everywhere!!
A lot of the income is derived from having multiple sites You can use your adsense on other sites too for extra $$ and link juice
there is no real wrong method. HP offers their own sources of income and it does work
I only wrote on Hubpages for the first year. In early 2011, the Panda slap decimated my earnings, just when I quit my job to work at home full time.
I learnt my lesson. Now I don't depend on one site to give me income - it can be taken away in a day, rules can change or you can get banned.
Now I write on a half dozen revenue sharing sites (for "loose" articles, backlinks and to see how topics do) but also have a good handful of my own sites.
Spread out, see what works - but try and write in more than one location.
+1
If you want to make a living online, it will take much more than just one site. Reading your profile, you've already chosen a particular topic: with that in mind, I would suggest the following strategy:
1. Create a blog or website about your chosen topic. Choose a domain name for it that reflects the subject (i.e.not your name!). If you're really serious, get hosting and use Wordpress software right from the start - there's a big learning curve, but hosts like Hostgator have excellent live support. Later, you'll be glad you made the effort.
2. Also write on HubPages and other revenue-sharing sites (Infobarrel, Wizzley, Xobba, PubWages, ThisisFreelance, Excerptz - there are lots). Write articles on your chosen topic. Link back to your blog in these articles, as well as linking them to each other across platforms. That way, you get a network of links promoting your blog and your articles - these are all valuable in Google's eyes. Plus you're raising your profile as an authority on the subject on the net.
On that score - I suggest you either use a full name (first name and surname). It doesn't have to be your real name if you'd prefer to protect your privacy - you can use a pen name, as I do. It just looks more professional.
I've written a few Hubs about getting started. My Hub about monetizing a blog would be useful - I wrote it for people using Blogger, but it's just as relevant for Wordpress.
Hey Susannah,
If you don't mind, can you please share which is the others revenue generating sites?
Blessings,
Regards,
Ashish
I'm relatively new here and only recently became somewhat active, but I would advise against putting all your eggs in one basket. I think you'll want to have several sources of income, so don't view it as an either/or choice. Personally, I'm doing Hubpages, Squidoo, and a few others, but I also have my own niche sites and am working on affiliate sales.
Yes you can make a reasonable income.
No, don't rely on this one site for your only source of online income.
The changes over the last year or so have impacted on many writers, whether they were excellent or below average writers.
Write a lot and very often if you want to make money.
Don't expect any significant income until most of your hubs have been published for at least 12-18 months. By then if they are any good they will have climbed up Google's Search Engine Rankings (providing no more weird algorithms muck that up).
Basically (being honest) it is a gamble, and personally I have articles over six sites including this one. Yes I make most of my money here, (90% of my articles are here), but also my earnings here have dropped a huge amount since Google brought out one of the recent 'Panda' updates (about 40% +). It is definitely making me think more about writing less here and more on the other sites I already have stuff on (including my own site). Google don't seem to like HP much anymore
Hope this helps
You're seeing less traffic now? Are you 100% sure about that?
According to my Google Analytics I'm seeing less traffic.
I was talking about mistyhorizon2003. Every person's traffic is different, although, as a site altogether, you can see traffic figures at quantcast.com.
The slip in views is apparent at quantcast now. Something is happening. Recent Google tweaks have been going against us. Or maybe a change at Hubpages is responsible.
This is looking less and less like the little temporary downturn I assumed it was last week.
http://www.quantcast.com/hubpages.com
It seems to be the established writers with older accounts who are suffering most. Perhaps the Google freshness update is kicking in.
Maybe. Maybe not.
I tend to open up the Quantcast period to Aug 2011 (post-Panda recovery). There was a peak in mid-February that we've dropped from. A Panda-like plunge? No.
I was just looking at quantcast when you replied, lol. Then I amended my comment above.
It does seem to be the people who have been here a long time who are reporting the worst losses. I have lost 20 percent in the last week, myself.
The site as a whole isn't slipping disastrously but the peaks and troughs are lower over the last month.
Of course, if it is a Google thing, they could tweak the algo again next month if it isn't delivering the results that they want.
And I agree it is not Panda, by the way. It is some other update.
Hate to be the devil's advocate (I'm sure most people know my views on HP and I'm still stinging from last year's lesson) but in this case it could just be the post-Christmas slump.
Generally it keeps dropping towards summer. And then it may just be things like trends, weather and people's changing use of the internet.
I'm not given to hasty gloom myself so I hope that you are right.
And your traffic has also never been higher. Three times as high as it was before Panda.
What exactly are you stinging from?
I am doing a lot better now than pre-panda but a sudden downward trend deserves some attention. For one thing, you never know where things will bottom out.
Of course you don't. You could end up like me, a forum regular, always ready to help out new hubbers, but not really part of the site because your traffic doesn't bring in enough earnings.
Sure. My theory is that the nofollowing of Pinterest links had an effect. But it's just a theory, because it could just be things settling after the surge in February.
Yes, it is now higher. Probably also due to the content ageing nicely.
I'm stinging from not only the slap but the team's attitude following it.
It's kinda like dating someone who cheats on you and then turns into the perfect partner. Once you've got that distrust it's hard to get rid of.
Hmm... well, we had a lot of griping about our policies post-Panda, and our traffic recovery seems to have vindicated the measures we took.
I seem to remember you among the voices that said that HubPages would never recover. Not only were you wrong about that as a whole, you were wrong with respect to your own account (a tripling of traffic is not the result of aging).
Yes, I was wrong in saying that Hubpages would never recover. From memory the main change that brought back the traffic was the subdomains NOT the many changes to the rules.
From memory, Hubpages have said themselves that articles can take up to three years to reach their peak. Pre-panda my articles were continuing to increase and they are still doing that, now the site is more stable once again. Yes it's probably partly due to subdomains but quite likely also due to ageing.
Not quite. Look at Suite101. Their lift from a move to subdomains was short lived.
The stricter content standards were very much part of the recovery in traffic. It's just odd to see protestations from those who were beneficiaries of our policy changes.
I am here longer than you, therefore my hubs have aged more than yours,agreed?
Your traffic is three times pre-Panda levels, mine is pre-Panda minus 80%.
Now, you are not a better writer than me. I have un-SEO'd hubs, probably you have too. Some hubs can't be saved that way.
A fellow writer cmhypno, is in the same boat. Even if you think my hubs are crap, are hers too? I don't think so.
There are other forces at work.
(Wouldn't let me reply to your post probably because it's too far right?)
I think we'll have to agree to disagree.
And I've had too many "The end justifies the means" situations in my life to appreciate that being used as justification, whether the ends were actually what were aimed for or not. (Yes I think there is bad grammar in that sentence somewhere!)
Have you read your hubs aloud, Will? You may find they don't read as well as you thought they did!
I have written some crap in my money grubbing efforts but I let the readers vote with their feet then bend to their will and delete.
Yes, I am 100% sure about that. I was on over 10,000 views a day after Oct 14th, for the last few weeks I have been struggling to hit 7000. Look at my figures, you have them! (don't forget to factor in that crazy skylancers.net incident the other day of course, as this artificially upped my views by nearly 18,000 in one day, and I reported this to you and have the emails exchanged between HP and me as proof). Is it possible you forgot to check (or allow for) this Jason???
In the last few days since Panda was run again it has been even more of a struggle and in spite of publishing a new hub every day in March my figures are barely staying the same as they were beforehand. Hubs that were on well over 1200+ views a day are now under 700. Something is very wrong here!
Your traffic pre-Panda was in the 2000 views/day range, and now in the 7000+ views/day range. You might see some fluctuations now, but you are clearly getting a lot more traffic now after the Panda recovery than even before Panda.
Read my post again Jason, I said the 'recent' Panda update, not the original Panda release, (note the date Oct 14th quoted in my recent post). I did not say Feb 2011 anywhere that I can see! (original Panda release into the wild).
Edit, and where are the other 3400 viewings a day I was getting up until a month or so back? My views have most definitely dropped by about 40% recently, as I was getting 10400 + a day as you will see if you check back on my views in recent months.
I don't know, Mistyhorizon2003. That 3400 views you are missing now you didn't have just a few months ago. It seems like since September, your traffic has been bouncing around between 7000-10000 daily. That you're in a relative lull doesn't mean Google has taken all your traffic away; in fact, they are sending you more than three times the traffic they were sending you before Panda.
So your statement that Google doesn't seem to like HubPages anymore is apparently untrue, even with respect to your account.
In Oct 2011 my viewings went up a great deal, and I posted in forums saying as much, whilst updating my figures every half hour or so. I know (as you do) that in the last few weeks those viewings have dropped off from over 10,000 to barely 7000. Daily right now they appear to be dropping lots of views (since the last couple of Panda runs). To illustrate this point one of my top two performing articles was on around 1400 views a day, this article has dropped to under 500 per day since the last Panda run. Another article was on 1700 views a day most days, this is now on about 900 per day since the recent Panda run. That is a whole lot more than 'a lull' in my book!
I am not trying to make a complaint about my traffic here anyway, (which seems to be how my original comment has been taken). I simply answered a question posed by a new hubber honestly as opposed to misleading them. I would only ask the same if the position was reversed (as I am sure you would).
(only at weekends were my views dropping as low as you imply. Most days they were well over 10,000 and dropped to 8000-9000 over Fri-Sun, now I look at today and I am on 6846 right now, and no doubt this will drop to under 6000 this weekend).
They made up for it with mine. So the universe is in balance.
Mistyhorizon thanks for answering many questions I have had! I love the detail you gave!
You are very welcome kelleyward, I prefer to tell it as it is, and wish you all the best here.
What would these girls be like if they dropped that much traffic since Panda? They don't seem to know they are born!
Izzy, you know I like you a whole lot, right? This is not me having a whinge about my earnings dropping in the recent times, or 'not knowing I am born'. This is about answering the original poster's question on the income possibilities from HP. I answered this honestly with the following text:
"Yes you can make a reasonable income.
No, don't rely on this one site for your only source of online income.
The changes over the last year or so have impacted on many writers, whether they were excellent or below average writers.
Write a lot and very often if you want to make money.
Don't expect any significant income until most of your hubs have been published for at least 12-18 months. By then if they are any good they will have climbed up Google's Search Engine Rankings (providing no more weird algorithms muck that up).
Basically (being honest) it is a gamble, and personally I have articles over six sites including this one. Yes I make most of my money here, (90% of my articles are here), but also my earnings here have dropped a huge amount since Google brought out one of the recent 'Panda' updates (about 40% +). It is definitely making me think more about writing less here and more on the other sites I already have stuff on (including my own site). Google don't seem to like HP much anymore"
*******
What I didn't expect was my comment to be incorrectly interpreted and to be virtually accused of lying because it hadn't been read properly!! I was not complaining about a drop in income, even though it is my ONLY personal income. I was attempting to pass on the realities of writing here to someone asking a question.
I am genuinely sorry that both you and Randy have been particularly unfortunate in your post Panda experiences, and I wish I could reverse this somehow for you. I really hope things get better for both of you soon and something changes that will help your figures go up.
Thanks for your good wishes, Misty. I've been reading this thread and been tempted to post, but you know what position I'm in now!
I don't make a lot here - but my niches are not high paying niches. I only try to kick A$$ in what I choose to write about, and for the most part, Google agrees.
I DO increase my earnings here most months. I've continually learned how to make a "good hub" though, and it's DEFINITELY a learning process, and a game of patience.
Yes, you can make money here, but your expectations are not something I'm familiar with. What are your expectations, and what kinds of things do you write about? Knowing the answers to those two questions would lead me, personally, to be able to give you some sort of general answer, but then I'd still need to see your work to assess my opinion of it's quality.
There are some people in this thread who would probably get more satisfaction pulling the wings off flies. So I am heading back to my new Kindle- my favorite toy ever. Goodnight all.
In a chatroom, your comment would probably carry more weight,Will.
This is a forum. Your comment tomorrow is irrelevant.
Nobody pulls the wings of flies, neither here nor wherever your imagination takes you, on this thread.
Traffic loss to any of us, is a serious matter.
Izzy and Will you both have a point.
Will - no matter how we dissect it, some things can't be explained unless we befriend the algorithm programming team at G headquarters.
Izzy - Yes. It is. And I keep hoping to see a thread from you with "OMG my traffic just increased by 2500%!" as the title.
I was born with better toys than a kindle..... :;
This thread is 4 years old. HP is pretty much the only viable revenue sharing site left.
@Will,
You are right Will. I was going through your 4 years old comments and comparing it with today's situation and scenario.
I must admit it, I just took a look at this thread and it is pretty illustrative of the doom and gloom that seized the site as Panda gradually gobbled it up. And the doom-sayers were proven right, unfortunately.
I am fairly optimistic about the future of the niche sites, though.
They have some issues,of course.
1. The link loops between the network sites are the main worry (maybe try getting rid of them from a test niche, see how much traffic, if any, you lose). When the best pages have gone to the niches, the link juice will be heading in the direction of the main domain. The poor quality of the pages on the main domain will forever doom it to Panda slaps, why waste that link juice?
2. HP might be tempted to fill up the niches with stocking fillers.
3. Writers need to earn money to get the kind of good quality content HP require. HP are not responsible for the tough online earning environment but they could look at maximizing revenue.
4. HP have shown no real sign that they understand the possibilities of the niche sites. There are so many ways to develop them, from social media and new advertising models to unique site features.
They need some creative editors to give them direction and get the best from them.
edit: one thing that annoys me these days is just how tedious the forums have become. Unbanning a few people would help. These lifetime bans are just insane. If someone cares enough about your site to lose it now and again, you do not want to get rid of them.
I agree about the social media promotion. Social promotion for each site could build up huge traffic for each niche.
by Bill Russo 9 years ago
Have all the changes over the last year ruined Hubpages?Change is like the mighty tide of the Atlantic Ocean. Refuse is hauled away on the backs of whitecaps and deposited in the uncharted depths. This is a good thing and yet, too often the churning surf also drags away and buries items...
by Mark dos Anjos, DVM 7 years ago
Do any hubbers spend 40 hours a week (or more) writing and researching hubs? Does the effort pay off if the site is treated like a regular job?
by Charles T Baumert 8 years ago
Hello everyone,I am new to HubPages and I want to hear how long you have been using HubPages and what your experiences are like using the site? Also, do any of you have your own domain and blog? If so, what is it about? I would love to hear your feedback!Cheers,Charlie
by UK Wordsmith 14 years ago
Why no income from Google Adsense?I signed up for Google Adsense when I posted my first hub two months ago. Since then, I have published fifteen hubs and had around seven hundred hits, yet I have not earned a single penny from Google Adsense.Can anyone offer a good reason for that?
by Dan Harmon 14 years ago
Along with the Google effect lately I've seen a lot of forum posts about spam, and every time I hub hop it is obvious that there is a lot submitted here of both spam and simply substandard hubs.I would suggest that the following rules apply to the first 5 (or 10 or 20?) hubs by any new...
by Sandra M Urquhart 9 years ago
What is the best way to get traffic on hubpages? Is it by the quality of your hubs or the frequency of your communication in the community? I've seen different articles that encouraged people to get noticed by being more social, claiming that that would increase interest and traffic; and then on...
Copyright © 2025 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2025 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |