Can someone outline the specific details about how the Related Hubs are selected and ranked. It appears to depend on the topic category, tags and keywords in the title. However it does not appear to be very reliable. Does anyone know the formula or how the elements are weighted.
It is my understanding that it is "supposed" to be related to just the tags that you have up. However, I have posted the problem of unrelated hubs coming up on many of my hubs according to that formula. It is supposed to be being checked into. Have not hear anything new about it in several days however. There appears to be a lot of "car" related hubs in particular that are showing up on non-car hubs. Hopefully, soon, we will get some resolve on this issue.
It would be helpful to know how related hubs are chosen. I just read an article titled "Benefits of Creating a DeviantART Account," and of the related hubs suggested to me, none were about art, which would be the logical subject I might want to read more about.
http://waynetully.hubpages.com/hub/Bene … RT-Account
They all had the word 'benefit' in their title, but had nothing else in common with the subject of the DeviantART hub. One was about the benefits of prayer, one was about the benefits of peanuts, one about the benefits of cinnamon and honey, etc. Three of them included the number '12', as in the 'Top 12 Amazing Benefits of Peanuts,' although the original article had nothing to do with the number 12.
I've learned from the forums that the categories we place our hubs in have no bearing on the related hubs displayed on our pages. Supposedly tags do, but from several examples I've seen, it seems that they don't. It seems that the hub title is all that matters?
How important are relevant links in Google's eyes? Are these crazy unrelated links hurting my chances of google recommending my hubs to searchers?
Please tell us how related hubs are determined so that we may do what we can to have relevant links placed in our hubs.
There was a previous discussion about this. If you overuse a word, it gets picked up. The person wrote an article on Olympics but used the word power as in power jumping 25 times. Related hubs were about electricity. Another hubber' figured it out.
Yes, that hub and forum post are mine. I unknowingly overused the word 'power' because that word is part of the name of the sport I wrote about.
However, in the article I'm using as an example now, the word 'benefit' is only used twice in the entire article, as well as once in the name. The author categorized this hub under 'graphic art' and the word 'art' is in the article 47 times.
Despite that, of the six related hubs, only one of them has anything to do with art. The rest are about the benefits of random things, with the exception of the oh-so-relevant 'How to eat muesli correctly."
I would love to know what I can do to manipulate the related hubs algo to work correctly and put up hubs that are actually related to my articles. It's not that I want readers to click away, it's mainly to avoid unrelated links that are apparently frowned upon by the Google gods.
by Dr. John Anderson 5 years ago
This issue has been raised many times in the past – but given the 20% drop in traffic it should be rectified urgently (good enough is no longer sufficient (IMO)Links to unrelated pages is something that Panda and Penguin have hit sites for. If an author puts an unrelated link on their page they...
by RoadMonkey 3 years ago
Someone wrote about the related hubs featured below their articles NOT being related. I just updated my Academic abstract hub, which shows you how to create a shortish piece of writing for submission and aimed at getting a longer article published for a conference or journal. Three of the...
by Eugene Brennan 11 months ago
I've had links to my own related hubs snipped on several occasions (mostly blatant lists at the end of a hub), but some links have been left in place after several snips. So is it acceptable to include a link to a hub which may be very relevant to the specific content in a section of a hub, if it...
by Sherri 7 years ago
I really can't point any of you to the many discussions there were about whether RSS feeds that display our own Hubs in a specific Hub of ours are a violation of the HP rules or not.I read info that the "best", "latest", and "hot" categories were not appropriate to add...
by Randy Godwin 6 years ago
I've just noticed something which concerns me a bit and wondered if it is something new or not. The related hubs, listed on my highest trafficked hub in my best niche, only have one hub which fits the description out of six examples. The other five--though distantly related--would...
by Faith Reaper 3 years ago
Why are ads now appearing in "Related Hubs" under our hubs? It does not look right for ads to be placed there.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|