To condemn someone who has committed infidelity is not always a good judgment. The reasoning behind the act of infidelity must be reexamine before the cheater can be proven guilty. As the old tradition say, once a cheater is always a cheater ...that may not always be the case. As you continue to read my thoughts, you'll noticed that the logic that support my arguments will prove this statement to be unreasonable at times.
* I'm disgusted about the action the media takes against our leaders to penalized those who have committed adultery. The pain and suffering that our media placed their families into are sometime unnecessary. We're a society who's enthuses about news that dealt with celebrities being caught having an affair ... for some reason we get a kick out of that, it actually excite us to see celebrities marriage being brake into peaces. We're the reason why Princess Diana got chased by Paparazzi to the point of an accident that caused her death. Our eager to know about her private life led to this accident. It's obvious that Paparazzi wouldn't have found the need to take private pictures had the price for one been invaluable. The value we place into celebrities private lives has a direct relationships towards their marriage.
"It's obvious that Paparazzi wouldn't have found the need to take private pictures had the price for one been invaluable." It was one
Rupert Murdoch, owner of Fox News that was paying for those
Its often so much easier to look and judge others rather than turn the spotlight on ourselves.
"He wouldn't pay for them if he couldn't make money selling them to American public..."
Well exactly, certain portions of the public, Autralia and Britain as well. Spose that same public, believe Fox News and voted for Bush.
Thanks for the comments guys. What i have written above is a full hub to read all of it please visit the page.
This is about sharing information and one can't share information by telling half of the story.
Each of one of us have no right to judge or accuse someone who committed mistakes because we don't know how it works to ourselves either if we committed same mistakes. Everything has it's own reason and purpose. Nobody can't even turn near to perfection because everyone wants to get even. The more you condemned the person, the more it complicates and worser. You are no help to let him wake up for such mistakes.
This is an interesting topic -
It seems that the media likes playing off the reactions of its viewers - thereby maintaining and sustaining its audience. The people conducting the story may have no "real" interest in infidelity - they may just cover it because it is a controversial enough topic here in the USA and involves someone prominent enough to draw interest.
It draws viewers and viewers lead to money.
by kallini20107 months ago
Why are people so interested in private lives of celebrities?Who are we to judge?
by LAURENS WRIGHT5 years ago
Is there a right or wrong without religion ?Killing, stealing, cheating or dishonest acts are throughout the world. Without truth and justice, is there a right and wrong without a religion or supreme justice for a...
by Elena7 years ago
Should Professional Sports men be Sacked due to infidelity or issues in their Private life?England Football Captain was sacked 5 Feb due to an Affair etc. I think what happens in his Private life should not interfere...
by Marcii7 years ago
why are paparazzi so annoying?
by mmarcelino6 years ago
Is it considered infidelity when you have a dream with someone other than your spouse?What would Freud say about this?--I was watching a documentary on "Dreams" last night and according to the famous Dr....
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.