There's no point in this because you don't understand how the technology works. Ludington pumped power storage already exists. It was awesome for the community when it went in, too. It employed so many people during its construction! It doesn't store little amounts of power. I've used energy stored with it for years.
It's so odd that you care more about fish getting sucked into turbines, a few birds hitting into windmills, and your view being ruined than human beings dying from climate changes. I just don't understand such a viewpoint. You don't even actually care about wildlife because you wouldn't be so pro fossil fuels if you did. Do you know how many dead animals fossil fuels produce?
I understand the technology far better than you do - I was an electrician for nearly 20 years and installed this stuff. And no, you did NOT use stored power for years, except that it was used and re-stored just like a battery. I haven't a clue as to the size of the reservoir, but very highly doubt it would last more than a few days, if that. It takes a LOT of water to produce power for even a small town.
I didn't say I don't care - I merely pointed out that a great deal of the population doesn't. It isn't me that you're fighting (except that I do understand how these things work and you obviously don't) - it's the rest of the country. You want a completely new energy grid, at triple the cost of the existing one, when we can't even afford to maintain the infrastructure that we already have (roads and bridges everywhere are literally falling apart).
Who paid for the wonderful construction that hired so many people? Again, it was mostly the people that will never see any use from it that covered much of the cost, but what the heck - it's free money from the feds!
(Did you ever consider that the cost of generation equipment doubled when you have to produce enough to not only satisfy current needs but also the needs of tomorrow as well? Twice the generation capacity, sitting idle much of the time, just to run those pumps. And that doesn't include the cost of the reservoir, spillway to the generator or valves to control it. Nor the upkeep over the years for all that. These kinds of things aren't cheap, no matter how many times the green crowd says they're free - did you read my earlier post about my local utility and the windmill companies?)
Mendoza, BM BUHM
Climate change is difficult to deal with because it affects the life of the people and their environment. Some of the impacts of climate change are stronger hurricane and severe heat waves which could be life threatening.
by JerryTillotson 8 years ago
Why do people get so emotional when global warming is questioned?As a high school social studies teacher, I find it necessary to present oppsoing points of view on all controversial subjects, including global warming. But frequently people become very expressive in their objections to the...
by dmop 7 years ago
If you could eliminate one major problem in the world what would it be?Do you have any ideas how this could be accomplished?
by Arthur Russ 2 months ago
Why Are so Many Americans in Denial of Human’s Contribution to Climate Change, and the Harm its Doing to the Planet?The evidence is so clear, just to name a few:-• The correlation between the burning of fossil fuel since the start of the Industrial Revolution and the increase in...
by Credence2 3 weeks ago
I like to think that he would consider the desire of the 55,000 residents there first?Such retrograde, colonialist sort of thinking....
by PrettyPanther 5 days ago
"The debate over the best ways to fight climate change has clear parameters. If you are a Democratic candidate for president, you believe climate change is an existential threat not only to the United States but to human civilization. You believe the country needs to reach net-zero carbon...
by emievil 10 years ago
I came upon this news that a study showed majority of the Americans do not believe humans caused global warming / climate change. Any idea if this is true? What about the rest of the world, what do we believe?This is the website - http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2 … -activity.
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|