One of Bertrand Russell's various proposals in Marriage and Morals (1929) suggests that the young should enter a rather relaxed form of marriage arrangement (i.e., instant divorce by mutual consent and no alimony obligations so long there were no children) for the purpose of bringing stability to their sexual lives. His basic premise was that such a stable relationship would free the young from promiscuity, hence, less distractions from their actual responsibilities....
Things have change quite a bit in the past eighty years, eh?
What is/was your experience like? Do you think your being (or not) on a relationship during your college years makes/made a difference on your academic performance as a student?
PS Thinking about doing a hub on the subject.
in my experience it was a very good thing that allowed me to focus on my studies without the distractions "free-ranging" can bring. plus at the end of the day you had a special person to share your day with. i do hope you make a hub about it because it is an interesting topic.
I didn't have time for a relationship in college my goal to graduate far outweighed personal needs good thing too cuz way too much homework n GPA to maintain.
I agree totaly with this statement, based from my experiences at UT. Austin.
I dropped out of a relationship I started there in, and I did so much better; and later when I had just a friend type of relationship, we both did not get in each others way. We both had goals and were able to finish them well. It was great.
I guess you could be in a relationship with your tutor and it would be a benefit. If you are in a relationship with a goof off, however it could be detrimental to your school work.
Ask yourself what kind of person you are, and then ask what kind of person you want to date.
My long-term relationship during college distracted me immensely. When it stopped, I was all A's.
For me, and as I see it with my sisters, casual or serious relationships (perhaps these even more) are distracting as you have other obligations and they went attention.
I decided after the bad relationship that I was so young and my studies were more important and I'd have plenty o' time to romance later on...I think college is better often without romantic distractions, especially serious ones.
That's just my take tho.
Thanks for your comments! Indeed, it is an interesting topic. In terms of my own experience, I had a similar outcome as cosette's.
So far, however, it seems like the single-while-in-college-was-better-for-my-academic-performance hubbers are winning!
Perhaps good old B. Russell was not right...
I think that having serious relationships are fine at college....depending on your maturity. Also, if you are at small college then I would suggest not to have one. College is also a exploring time...learning about yourself. It might be good to learn how to have a serious relationship, but if you don't know yourself yet then it's not gonna work. In other words, it depends on the person .
Bertrand Russell was quite a promiscuous one, having affairs everywhere
I wouldn't use him as a moral compass
That is not to discount his mathematical and epistemological triumphs
My son is a chem major and he will have a successful college or I'll drop kick him off the planet. He can just get over any sexual tension he might have because if he's fooling around that will be the least of his worries! Anyway I tell his girlfriends he has AIDS.
My grades only went up as soon as I was in a relationship. I was a slacker and she was an A student, I guess I felt like I needed to compete to keep up!
by Lauren!!!! 6 years ago
What really made your college experience?
by whitney_185 7 years ago
Who has the best overall program and has made a difference in their school?
by Rafini 5 years ago
Hi all, long time no see! How is everyone? It's exam week here and I'm considering changes for the upcoming semester....Such as:The degree is more important than the grade. True?If true then I'm free to pursue other interests and create my own college experience - as long as I...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 3 years ago
Why it is best for people not to marry until at least their late 20s to early 30s because duringthat period, they would have had experienced & experimented with varied lifestyle & relationship options, have attained the necessary education, & have a stable career?
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|