Is History a precise science or an instrument to manipulate the consciousness of

Jump to Last Post 1-11 of 11 discussions (16 posts)
  1. Pavlo Badovskyy profile image76
    Pavlo Badovskyyposted 6 years ago

    Is History a precise science or an instrument to manipulate the consciousness of peoples?

  2. randslam profile image83
    randslamposted 6 years ago

    History has almost always been recorded by the victors of conflict. It is only in our present-day opportunity at electronic publication that we begin to see what the "losers" of conflict have to say.

    An era of recorded "loser" history...whattayaknow...it's a very unique age that we live in.

  3. chef-de-jour profile image97
    chef-de-jourposted 6 years ago

    History can never be a precise science because it is a study of the past and that means it will be distorted factually in some way by some degree. Humans are incapable of recording events and incidents as pure happenings because mindsets/psychologies/culture warp and discolour. So it is that educational systems in different parts of the world offer only a partial view on historical facts!

    As an instrument of manipulation - well, yes, history is used to do just that and there are umpteen examples to illustrate the fact. Propaganda comes in all shapes and forms and history sometimes becomes propaganda, especially in times of war and national stress.

    Governments world wide often have to apologise for their predecessors' misdoings and misinformation - lies that have been spat out as truths become a tainted sort of history.

    As far as I can see the only history that is relatively harmless is archaeology.

    1. Pavlo Badovskyy profile image76
      Pavlo Badovskyyposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I loved your statement about archaeology as a harmless branch of history!

    2. Rod Marsden profile image71
      Rod Marsdenposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      WELL DONE CHEF!

  4. Bretsuki profile image77
    Bretsukiposted 6 years ago

    As a history major I faced this question many times.

    From the point of view of an historian, history is not a precise science. It cannot be a science in the way that chemistry or practical physics are sciences. The historian cannot go back and recreate a moment from the past and have that past replay as a chemist can when mixing various substances.

    History is a matter of opinion. That opinion is derived from previous historians recording of the past and is constantly under revision as new material becomes available.

    History can be and is manipulated by various groups, not necccessarily governments for various reasons. The only protection against the malicious use of "history" is to learn about the subject from as many different sources as one can.

    1. Rod Marsden profile image71
      Rod Marsdenposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Good answer!

    2. profile image0
      Kieran Gracieposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, totally agree.  I usually try to read about any particular historical event from at least two different sources at once.  This is easy for periods such as World War 2 but not so easy for more obscure times.

  5. profile image0
    Old Empresarioposted 6 years ago

    History is conceptual. It is one of the last fields left over from the Enlightenment that has not been corned and professionalized. The Scientific Method can be applied to history with one theory being constantly tested. The trouble is the "evidence" itself, in this case primary sources, may have been been falsely written from the beginning to mislead contemporary people and posterity. Universal facts of history can be seen from one perpective to create a truth that is used to manipulate the consciousness of people. Where academic historians often go wrong is when they apply any sort of bias to the subject they are studying without knowing it. Racism factors into the writing of history beyond a doubt.

    I honestly think historians would do better to stop explaining the "why" of history and focus more on the "what" and "how" of history. I don't want to know WHY Truman dropped the atomic bomb on Japan. I don't want to know WHY we involved ourselves in the Greek Civil War, and I don't want to know someone's interpretation on WHY Fidel Castro took over Cuba. In my mind, the "why" is the source of manipulation as historians become the apologists for every political misdeed. Instead, talk about WHAT Truman did: He refused Japan's July 1945 offer of surrender and dropped two atomic bombs in August 1945. After that, he granted them the terms of which they had originally asked back in July. Please don't let an historian explain to me why Truman did that. Let me  learn more and understand the objective facts and understand that it was not ethical, even in 1945.

  6. Historicus profile image61
    Historicusposted 6 years ago

    History is definitely not a precise science.

    It may be used as a tool to manipulate the consciousness of peoples if the writer wishes to but the readers must accept what he says as the truth.

    My view of history is to find out what happened in the past, concerning certain events or episodes.  The historian should be objective as possible and look for just the facts as he can best discern them.

    And to that end, history should looked at in order to solve the problems of today.

    1. Rod Marsden profile image71
      Rod Marsdenposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      The problem with mixing propaganda with truth is that some of the truth tends to get lost in the mix. Readers tend to accept what well educated historians write or say. There you have some power and some responsibility.

  7. cattleships profile image80
    cattleshipsposted 6 years ago

    History is definitely not a science of any sort, though various branches of science are used for historical discovery and verification. History is a chronicle. True history, that is, history not manipulated, distorted or suppressed either at the time of recording or later on by someone or some group with an agenda, can be very precise. Contemporary history may be more detailed than, say, ancient history because contemporary recording methods are technologically more advanced than were those of ancient times. However, details do not necessarily mean accuracy, precision. A true and complete history is a window to the future. A manipulated, distorted or suppressed history is no window at all; it's just a lie. And why would anything other than a true and complete history be presented? To manipulate, distort or suppress the truth... whatever that may be; and to push ahead whatever agenda the liar wants. On a grand scale, manipulation of the consciousness of peoples is certainly a possibility.

  8. Sherry Hewins profile image96
    Sherry Hewinsposted 6 years ago

    I wrote a hub about this several months ago. In a nutshell, I said that history can never be objective in part because events are always filtered through the perspective of the observer. Also it can easily be manipulated. If you'd like to see the whole hub it's.

    http://sherryhewins.hubpages.com/hub/Ho … is-History

  9. Rod Marsden profile image71
    Rod Marsdenposted 6 years ago

    History can't be a precise science as it relies too heavily on recollections of the past. Just because these recollections are put down on paper doesn't make them 100 percent true. Also people make up things for various reasons.   

    There was a time when only the wealthy had books and most people were illiterate. In those days books, including those dealing with history, were written to cater to a slim minority. Back in the 12th Century Geoffrey of Monmouth produced Historia Regum Britanniae (The History of the kings of Britain). Today this so-called history book isn't considered much of a history book at all. Much of the content is fictitious with propaganda aimed at making the prospective reader look good. Nowadays there is enough proof to say that the Trojans did not found the British nation. Even so, there is real history even in this book if you can manage to swim without sinking through the rest of it.

    Here I am suggesting that at times looking at the author and his motivation or motivations to write history wouldn't be a bad idea.

    Nowadays we can be beguiled by film footage from the past and hence accept a documentary as being for real even if others might find it questionable. We've seen it so it must be true, right? Well, film footage can be manipulated through its positioning in the narrative that goes with it. Important details can be left out.

    In the past, in a less literate age, there was and remains a drought of evidence and information about the lives led by ordinary people. For the past three hundred years, however, there has been a flood of information about anything and everything. Part of what an historian has to do is sift through all this information to find what suits best his research. Things are left out because they must be left out. Choices have to be made and they are not always the right choices.

    I have noticed of late that, in a lot of modern history books dealing with the 20th Century, Germany after 1918 and before 1936 tends to be a blank spot. It is just not dealt with. To me how Hitler got into power and how a people gave up democracy for something much, much worse is a story worth telling. Unfortunately, you have school kids nowadays that think the German people just went mad one day, put Adolf Hitler in charge of everything and began to make war on their neighbors.

  10. profile image0
    Sarra Garrettposted 6 years ago

    History is not a science.  History is fact and History repeasts itself that is a proven fact.

  11. profile image0
    jambo87posted 6 years ago

    Biased historical perspective is prolific in any culture; propagandists select facts and purport implications to serve their own rhetorical or deceitful purposes. However, history, broadly speaking, is the conglomeration of means (facts, opinions, and interpretations) serving a multiplicity of ends, and therefore its subject cannot be pinned down through scientific method. While we can look at one source and evaluate it's objectivity, we cannot apply a hypothesis for determining that the next source we examine will conform to a measurable set of principles. Any scientific approach to history can only apply to the verification of historical fact, but even then, the historicity of the source can prove it's bias.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)