Do standardized tests determine who will be successful?
As a former music teacher I noticed that a week or two before standardized tests all classes/recess were cancelled to cram test ?'s and answers to the test. Does this really prove what kids have learned or how successful they will be in life?
Standardized tests do not prove anything significant about children, and teaching children to the test, especially in the extreme manner you have just described is counterproductive and harmful. They do not bring out any creativity or original thinking in children, and do much more harm than good. Standardized tests prove how bad the public school systems are, not how good or bad their students are.
I agree 100%! I don't understand why our schools do this or what they think they are really proving with the results.
I believe it is partly politics. Also, I think they believed in it when they first started it, but since then, it has been proven to be bad. Now, it would take more politics and money to radically change them.
Standardized tests don't prove anything except how to stress out children...we have amazing, bright, wonderful students who perform badly on tests and then get frustrated and want to give up on school...we need some way to monitor progress, but standardized tests are not the way...
I think it provides a basic idea of whether students are learning and retaining concepts. The problem with standardized testing is that too often many other important aspects of education get placed on the back burner like: character education, creativity and applied problem-solving. With so much emphasis on standardized testing it seems that students who think creatively or non-conventionally get marginalized or seen as less capable. For example, I once read a statistic that stated that the majority of students labeled as "gifted" were left-brained or step-by-step, linear thinkers while the majority of students labeled as having a "learning disability" were considered right-brained thinkers who rely on intuition and creativity to solve problems.
That's very interesting!
I do think there are minimal standards kids need to know, just think there has to be a better way of testing it. Having kids cram by memorizing facts on the test for a week before the test doesn't prove real knowledge.
I think there has to be a baseline of education that everyone gets to. With out benchmarks there is no way of knowing who is where, this is why students are given tests to begin with.
So I think standardized tests have a certain value in that respect.
Whether we like it or not there is a certain amount of "test taking ability" exists in virtually every aspect of life.
So I think standardized tests have a certain value in that respect.
After the first go around I think teachers should be able to absorb the tested material into their lesson plan with fair ease. If the test is so complex and unrelated that everyone has to drop everything and cram there is probably something wrong with the test.
I remember as a student having to take such tests and we weren't given any advanced notice. They just walked in and said "today your lesson is changed ad you will take this test instead." There was no cramming, no extra study time, you just took the test and a few weeks later we would hear how we did.
I would think that the learning curve for teachers would be pretty short since they, in theory, know the material.
All that said I would have to see the test to say if I favor a certain test. If it is a test on the real subject IE: reading music, that is fine.
But if it is a test on "who added the inner curlicue to the B flat note and in what year was it adopted?" it is a waste of valuable time.
Thank you for your answer. I agree there have to be certain standards met but cramming the answers before the test doesn't prove practical knowledge. I wonder if there is a better way altogether to assess if what was learned can be used.
Well as I said for us it was all just part of the classes, If you were in the second semester of English you were expected to know certain things without extra study. We never had a chance to cram.
Absolutely not. Some people are terrible test takers yet know how to successfully live life, work well with others at work, and have very successful and fulfilling relationships. Never, never judge a person on their test-taking abilities. This from a retired teacher who had to " teach to the test" - waste of time and not education at all.
No, certainly not. The results of standardized testing are especially meaningless for children under 8. Therefore, parents of young children should opt out of high stakes testing. It's a waste of class time.
Testing has narrowed the scope of education as teachers teach to the test. Kindergarten teachers now have 90 standards to teach, assess, and document. Creativity, exploration, and problem solving have been replaced by rote learning. Knowledgeable, experienced teachers know that standardized testing is out of control but less experienced ones just go along with the program.
by Adamowen 5 years ago
Do you think test scores are a good indication of a school's competency?
by EDU 101 8 years ago
How do YOU feel about standardized testing? My main interest is how many parents use the test scores to determine school placement for their child (and how they achieve that placement), but feel free to talk about any aspect of standardized testing.
by Ciel Clark 6 years ago
Do you like standardized testing or do you think it stifles the creative mind?
by RJSkains 9 years ago
I was just wondering if anyone else thought that standardized testing in grades K-12 is a good indicator of if a child is smart or not?
by OLYHOOCH 7 years ago
WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama said Monday that students should take fewer standardized tests and school performance should be measured in other ways. Too much testing makes education boring for kids, he said."Too often what we have been doing is using these tests to punish...
by fitmom 6 years ago
Should a teacher's pay be related to their students scores on standardized tests?Many states have gone to merit based pay for teachers whereby they pay teachers based on how their students perform on standardized tests. The thought behind it is to motivate teachers to help their students to perform...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|