What happened to the logical premise that people receive payment in accordance to their educational,
skill set, brand, & customer/public demand level, not to mention level of job complexity & responsibility? Why do some people strongly contend that job payment should be equally distributed despite jobs required vastly divergent educational, skill set, complexity, & responsibility levels?
I don't know that anyone contents that payments should be equally distributed. I think most logical people understand that a CEO should be paid more than a cashier.
However, I do think that over the course of the last 50 years, the difference between what a cashier is paid, and what a CEO is paid, has widened to a point that is ridiculous. Since the 1970s, CEO salaries have risen over 900%, while worker's salaries have risen 11%.
Even given the more complex job of being a CEO in the modern world, how is this inequity fair? If a CEO is doing his job, and his company is making a profit, shouldn't his workers be seeing higher salaries, as well? It seems as though more often, the profit goes to those at the top, and nothing makes it down to the workers. In contrast, when a CEO does a bad job, the workers are often the first to suffer, with cuts in hours and pay, or loss of employment, while the bad CEO is given a huge severance package.
50 years ago, a worker on the lowest end of the pay scale could still feed their family, and consider saving up for a home. Today, those lowest workers have to ask for government assistance just to keep food on their tables. Meanwhile, the big bosses are raking in the bonuses, stock options, and huge salaries. Does this seem fair to you? Does it seem logical to reward people for underpaying their workers?
I think that's the equality issue here. Not that everyone should be paid equally, but that everyone should be paid in equal proportion to their contribution to the company. Right now, that payment is way out of balance.
For the most part the educational requirement by companies isn't really valid or substantial. A college degree is useful for companies to bring on new talent for entry level positions. But, when it comes to working knowledge, education is secondary to the actual experience of the candidate.
Much of educational knowledge, especially in the high technology field is out of date to the technology used by most hi tech companies. In addition, every company has their own way of doing business. So, moving between companies is an educational process in and of itself. The new company has to train the person in the way that they do business, as in procedures and processes. They also may use the tech products uniquely.
So, a person that is intelligent could quite easily be trained on the job without a college education, but a personal with a college degree, still needs to be trained by the company.
Education and industry are not in sync. There are trade schools that are more in sync with industry for technology positions.
Lets face it, technology will grow, and education will not be able to keep up with it. Experience and accomplishment trump education.
If "experience and accomplishment trump education" were true, companies wouldn't lay off older, more experience workers, and hire younger, less experienced workers to replace them. The only thing that matters to any company is the almighty dollar.
It is still true nevertheless.
Even though they may get younger people that doesn't mean that they choose education over experience. One factor that you have not mention is that hi technology makes use of contractors,
they are experienced& expen
There is a difference between equal opportunity and equal outcome.
Those demanding flat wages for all want equal outcome - the guy serving fries making as much as the one working physically twice as hard digging ditches and the one risking his life fixing downed power lines.
Those who want wages set by the market want equal opportunity - you study longer for a marketable degree or take the work no one else wants to do (Dirty Jobs of Mike Rowe fame), and you make a lot of money because of supply and demand. If you're willing to learn or do the harder or nastier jobs, you will make more.
by G. Diane Nelson Trotter5 months ago
The Age of Technology brings opportunities for those who have STEM (science, technology, engineeriing and mathematics) skills. 1. What about people who want to work @ fast food restaurants or retail...
by Barefootfae5 years ago
Once again there is a call to raise the minimum wage.Now....common sense and a little education will tell you that when you raise the minimum wage, prices go up to compensate. Also, you stand the chance of having a nice...
by Dennis L. Page3 years ago
Should fast food workers be paid $12 to $15 per hour?Thousands of fast food workers are threatening to stage a "walkout" demanding the be paid a "living wage" of approximately $31,000 annually....
by Rashid Khan2 years ago
Can you maintain a decent living under current $7.25 per hour minimum wage?There are many activist groups and labor unions in different states pressing for increase in the current minimum wage, while on the other hand,...
by LAURENS WRIGHT5 years ago
Do you feel that it is good to take from the people who work and strive to give to those who won't ?More than 40 percent of the people of the US do not work for an income, but rely on others for support. Do you...
by rebekahELLE3 years ago
I am currently doing some research on private school education.The Waldorf schools are expensive and non-traditional, emphasizing the whole child. I have heard both pros and cons. While I like some of their...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.