Has multiuniverse maths proved unicorns exist?
New multiuniverse math is telling us anything and everything can exist including unicorns! Is this true? Are serious scientists now saying heaven could exist as well as God?
I've read on a number of occasions that if a thing can be imagined it already exists somewhere. It has to, because there is no such thing as nothing. This is because Infinite Intelligence is every thing and everything all in the present moment of Now.
The moment it is imagined it is brought into being on some dimension. This is how things are eventually materialized. First comes the impulse or desire. Then comes the imagined object. The imagined object is described (or drawn or portrayed in some way. It is not until this happens that we can then ACT on the idea. That is, build it/manufacture it.
In other words, we can only imagine and create from WHAT IS. So it would seem that unicorns do exist on some level, somewhere, otherwise their existence would be inconceivable.
Hello Oztinato. Thank you for another interesting question causing me to ponder for 'self' & explore. I plan to look closer later. Anyway, the short answer to the OP question maybe not quite yet 'proved', but has opened doors much wider.
After exploring with the second question I 'think' very much it can be true. The third question is I think 'serious scientists' are saying it is a possibility while there is debate not yet resolved.
I have set up a Word file to further look into this a project discovering and learning. Again thank you . . .
The multiverse is a silly idea which tries to fix problems that the standard model can't explain. You have an infinite number of excuses for why things are the way they are, and no one can check to see if these things are so. It's not scientific, it's fantasy.
It may be, but more scientists are getting on board about it as new supercomputers crunch the numbers. Other areas of science in particular quantum physics are also confirming these new ideas.
Equations and computer models isn't evidence. The multiverse theory can literally not be proven, ever. It is the ultimate observer effect contradiction, and we know the observer effect is real because of the double slit experiment. Pure fantasy!
I suggest that there is no such thing as a silly idea, only the limitation on the person who cannot conceive that everything that can be thought of ALREADY IS. Bit like an anchor line which is too short to touch bottom.
This idea that there are infinite universes created every time a chance of something different happening presents itself, and there is no actual way of checking this except to trust equations, is not silly?
We have to ask ourselves why hardened cold blooded atheist scientists are so impressed with new supercomputer maths as to open their minds to such extraordinary hippy trippy possibilities.
Perhaps it has something to do with the alternate explanation being such a hated thing, that they will go to great lengths to prove anything but that one thing? I think it has more to do with that, otherwise the deception would not be so strong.
The multi-verse theory suggests anything within the realm of physics and biology is possible. Unless a unicorn doesn't start growing its horn until after birth, biology alone makes it unfeasible.
It does mean worlds where the asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs had a mass ejecta earlier and missed the Earth or the genetic quirk that led to humans having fewer chromosomes than other apes and made them a separate species didn't happen. And those type of scenarios are much more likely than unicorns.
Worlds still with dinosaurs, some of which may be intelligent by now, and multiple advancing hominid species also get points for being interesting.
Apparently there may be an infinite number of permutations. There's even a planet out there with beings like us who have their own Star Trek series. Better still the Enterprise and crew must be actually exploring space somewhere!
Most horned animals are born without a horn, so it would make perfect sense that a biological unicorn would grow it's horn after birth as well. I see no reason why a horse couldn't end up with a horn-like structure that grows similarly to antlers.
Will we be able to one day swap brand new 60s star trek episodes with other interdimensional beings as easy as Homer can reach through a matter transporter for a beer? http://hubpages.com/politics/Recently-F … k-Episodes
OR will the real God please stand up and inject sense into this chaotic vision of endless dimensions? In other words Kurt Godel's concept of "Perfect"( as God) can only exist as One; hence bringing sense, order and perspective to the alleged math schmozzle.
by Raffia 6 years ago
Are unicorns really that crazy?Unicorns are basically horned horses, yet people are completely against the idea. What's so crazy about a horned horse? We have horned goats and horned rhinos (okay, so they generally have horns, I know). Ignore the fact that they fart rainbows and poop glitter,...
by Life Under Construction 7 years ago
Do you believe that unicorns exists?
by cooldad 2 years ago
What if this happened today. All the news networks, all the world leaders, all the scientists, all the leaders of churches announced that it was proven that God does not exist. Proven beyond any reasonable doubt whatsoever.What would you do? How would society and the world react?
by mischeviousme 7 years ago
"I am not an atheist. I have a rational fear of God, and yet the common sense to ignore it." The Bible gives us an idea about how to be accountable for our actions, while also giving us a pair of scapegoats. On one end you have Hell (a place we go when we have sinned too much). On the...
by JeremysStuff 8 years ago
I had originally posted this as a question in the "Answers" section, but it was taken down because it "invoked a conversation rather than a Q&A.... So that's why I brought it here! I want you guys to sound off on what you think about this subject, does God exist? Why do / don't...
by Rod Martin Jr 7 years ago
Is God a nothing?Couldn't it be said that God is "no thing" -- not a physical construct or created object? If one posits a source of the universe (and logically existence of anything seems to demand a source) then this "nothing" could be the source of every "thing." In...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
HubPages Inc, a part of Maven Inc.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|