What is the point of the nuclear weapons race?
Source: Federation of American Scientists (Feb 2017) shared at Statista.com. In order; Russia - 7,000, U.S. - 6,800, France - 300, China - 260, UK - 215, Pakistan - 130, India - 120, Isreal - 80. (Note: North Korea estimate is 15)
It always makes me wonder when one of these nations says to another that their actions are "unacceptable". What does that mean in light of the above numbers?
It all started in the stone-age when weapons were a necessity for basic survival. As clans grew, warfare increased among them. And as warfare grew, the power of the weapons grew. The introduction of gunpowder from the East in the early second millennium raised weaponry to a new plateau. Armor evolved, then tanks.
Prior to the Nuclear Race, it was superiority in the air, hence the aircraft carrier trumping the importance of the battleship, a major observation of the Second World War. At the turn of the last century, there was a global war-ship (dreadnoughts) race, which had to be brought under control by the Washington Naval Treaty of 1922.
Since mankind has unleashed the power of nuclear fission, there would be no winners should a global nuclear disaster come to bear, but the industry itself is a huge financial endeavor, as it is with all things military. Today, I see the nuclear weapons race as a political chess match with spending as the ultimate by-product.
It's the "Peace through strength" theory.
If your enemy knows you have a large arsenal of nuclear weapons they're not likely to want to engage in a war with you.
Nations have nuclear weapons as a deterrent to keep their rivals from using nukes on them.
Trump claims our military is depleted. I believe we have the strongest military in the world. Trump wants to increase defense spending by 54 billion and reduce federal agency spending by the same amount. This will make the defense contractors and all the others subsidiary infrastructures very rich. It will also put a lot of people to work.
In the 1960's during the cold war, the missile race was on with the soviet union. I worked for a company called Autonetics that employed 6,500 people just to create the guidance and control systems for the Minuteman missile and the nuclear submarines and their missiles. We were paid by the government to put missiles in holes and to spend that money to stimulate the economy. Thank God the missiles were never used. But that same technology was never upgraded from the 60's...Maybe that is what Trump has up his sleeve?
This shows that all of them have the power to disolve human life . God gives life man takes it away.
But it is written there will be a limit to this madness. Earth will be what Gods purpose for it to be from the start , inhabital and in peace no more war.
The point? Well, to be blunt...it's to see who's got the biggest phallic symbol in their arsenal...it's a dick-swinging contest that assures MAD-ness...that is, mutually assured destruction...it's a waste of time, money, weaponry and life--imagine where the planet could be economically if it wasn't for this insane dick race?
Lets say it is believable the statistical niumbers. The nuclear weapons as any other is for to be used some day at appointed time for a friendly confrontation.
by Useful Knowledge 9 years ago
North Korea is threatening to "wipe the Us off the map." Do they have the weapons to do this? Do you think we can intercept thier missiles?
by Mike Russo 18 months ago
What did America do to make North Korea hate us?
by Ralph Deeds 7 years ago
How serious and immediate is a nuclear threat from Iran? What should we do about it? Some of the same hawks who helped talk us into invading Iraq are coming out of the woodwork and saying that a nuclear Iran is intolerable and something must be done to prevent it from happening. A timely and...
by rhamson 9 years ago
With Irans new revelations that they have a secret site for the nuclear capabilities is this the latest step in the path to a nuclear war?
by Barbara 7 years ago
What do you think will happen to North Korea's nuclear weapons?Are you afraid, now that Kim Jong Ill is dead, that North Korea's nuclear weapons might fall into terrorist hands? What supports your opinion?
by Jack Lee 21 months ago
It is a delemma for me. As a conservative and one who does not like wars unless absolutely necessary, I am just not sure what we can do in this case.You have a dictator who is treated as a god by his own people, almost like a cult.They have been brainwashed to hate us and the west.They also possess...
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|