If someone you loved died in font of you, yet someone was able to reproduce he/s

1. 0

   threekeysposted 6 years ago

   If someone you loved died in font of you, yet someone was able to reproduce he/she right down
   
   to the same atomic level, would the love you feel be the same or different?
   
   

   replyreport
2. 56

   The0NatureBoyposted 6 years ago

   That question means you do not know what love is if it was intended to read "If someone you loved died in font of you, yet someone was able to reproduce them right now [would you allow it]." The only love is respecting all beings for what they are, seeking to understand their message to oneself, sharing what we have to offer and allowing it/them to follow their own destiny.
   
   I watched a video of a Moose fighting a pack of wolves to protect her calf. She fought the pack until she discovered the calf no longer breathed and walked away knowing she had done all she could.
   
   Loving without conditions and realizing most things are the "reaping what was sown" [karma] during a previous life come back upon them, thus, if I knew I could do something about a dying entity, being one in tuned with the "Zeroversal Spirit", I would inquire and perform according to what spirit reveals concerning the being be they enemy or friend.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      threekeysposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Apologies, a typo.. (font=front).
      Intersting perspective. If I have understood where you are coming from,  I am asking a question of whether we could feel/see the spirit/soul of someone or not and whether it would make a difference to our connection

      replyreport
   2. 56

      The0NatureBoyposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      A friend's telepathically connected twin discarnated while with me but she was not disturbed. A short time later her twin chose to reincarnate. I know not if she encouraged the reincarnating nor if it was a clone of her body but without any emotions.

      replyreport
3. 45

   Ericdierkerposted 6 years ago

   Without getting to far out there.We see a body. Forget reincarnation for your question does not address such. Souls are what are truly loved and love. The soul is not dirt or water or sun or darkness they are not animal and they are not plant. Anatomical and Atom are not part of soul. Genetics are not part of soul. DNA is not soul. Souls are forever. One cannot die of the soul.
   So a new material person cannot have a same soul as another. Kind of like no snowflake being alike. Souls do not hop scotch from one body of atoms to the next.
   Existentialism and materialism explain life in different ways but neither suggests that man can transfer a soul in any way. Etherealism and cognitive reality cannot capture a soul and implant it in another, it is not compatible with a theory of soul.
   So in no way can we replicate the only thing that makes us us.Quantumness and String theorization directs us to understand that which is is forever back and forward - an Alpha and Omega. Matter as in human form is not a connection to the universe of a love connection between beings.
   We can love the new but it is not the old.

   replyreport
   1. 0

      threekeysposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      I see it this way, too.

      replyreport
   2. 56

      The0NatureBoyposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Cloning does exist, so, does the soul re-enter the cloned body or does the soul divide and manifest as the cloned entity?
      
      What you call soul I call life-force, I call the integration of the life-force, body and consciousness the soul.

      replyreport
   3. 45

      Ericdierkerposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Incorrect in my opine.

      replyreport
4. 69

   shanmarieposted 6 years ago

   Are you speaking of cloning? I would say much the same thing Eric said. Our instinct might be to love the same, but would the personality and essence if the person still be the same? If not, it wouldn't be the same love.
   
   However, even cloned animals start from infancy or conception, so to speak, correct? In that case, you can't be speaking of a clone. But it seems like the same type of concept.

   replyreport
   1. 56

      The0NatureBoyposted 6 years agoin reply to this

      Clones don't begins at infancy. Someone claiming to have been in her mother when her mother was killed say she reappeared in her cloned mother. By my knowledge of her she is telling the truth about remembering her conception, gestation and birth.

      replyreport