Is Wikipedia reliable and accurate as a source of information ?

Jump to Last Post 1-8 of 8 discussions (16 posts)
  1. agusfanani profile image76
    agusfananiposted 5 years ago

    Is Wikipedia reliable and accurate as a source of information ?

  2. joanwz profile image72
    joanwzposted 5 years ago

    I've been told by some professors (when i was in college recently) that Wikpedia is okay as a source. OThers preferred students either NOT use Wikipedia or make sure they use other sources to back up the Wikipedia information. The main problem with Wikipedia is that anybody can write the articles, and anybody can edit them. That being said, the articles i have read and used as resources have all had a bibliography at the end, listing the resources used to write the article. All I can say is, if the information seems accurate, use it as a resource, but make sure you back it up with other resources to be on the safe side.

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hello joanwz. We hope that people who contribute or edit the content of Wikipedia are all because of their concern on its improvement and have relevant capabilities or expertise in doing that. Thank you very much for your valuable answer.

  3. faisalb87 profile image42
    faisalb87posted 5 years ago

    I think it’s not a reliable source for a student because any one can write an article on Wikipedia.

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you for your answer.

  4. Jamie Brock profile image93
    Jamie Brockposted 5 years ago

    Hi agusfanani, I think for the most part the info is true and correct... though it does bother me that anyone can write or edit, I usually have a good feeling about the info there. When something seems as though it may not be true, I will follow up with other sources and it usually always matches up.  Hope this helps!

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hi Jamie Brock. Thank you for your help. I agree with your idea that we should consider other sources too, specially for technical and scientific information.

  5. lone77star profile image84
    lone77starposted 5 years ago

    No. Wikipedia has some good information, but you have to be careful about bias, undocumented information and mistakes.

    Not everyone who contributes to Wikipedia is professional and unbiased.

    But also, Wikipedia is biased on some subjects, especially controversial ones like 9/11.

    I am a member of Wikipedia and make corrections when I spot errors, but it could be a full-time job.

    The best thing to do is use Wikipedia as a "starting place" for ideas on things to check. It's best to verify the facts you find in Wikipedia. Question the validity of everything it says. Assume there are mistakes and bias and you might more easily spot the problems. Then by double-checking the facts, you can confirm or deny your assumptions.

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you very much Ione77star, for you explanation which gives me more clarity on using it as a source of information.

  6. suzettenaples profile image88
    suzettenaplesposted 5 years ago

    Most of the time Wikipedia is reliable and accurate.  But, I have found on certain subjecs they are not up to date or have inaccurate information.  Sometimes you have to check their 'facts' and I have found that they literally lift the writing from some websites on a subject and put it word for word in their wikipedia article.  I never use them as the sole source for anything - I always check two or three sources on whatever I am writing.

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Yes, It's a good idea to always back up with information from other sources.
      Thank you for answer, Suzettenaples.

  7. rjsadowski profile image69
    rjsadowskiposted 5 years ago

    No source is completely reliable. What is claimed to be a fact today turns out to be a misconception tomorrow. Wikipedia is changing constantly so it tends to be a little less reliable than some other sources. However, it is the single best source for quickly finding information on a subject as long as you verify important facts on other sources. Wikipedia list of references that they used is often a good place to start a search on a subject. Highschool teachers don't want their students to use Wikipedia because it makes the student's job too easy and they prefer to see their students struggle.

    1. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Hi rjsadowski. I  share the same idea that Wikipedia's constant changing can be good in making it always up-to-date despite no guarantee about the contributor's quality. So, it's important to have  other alternative reference.

  8. KrisL profile image86
    KrisLposted 5 years ago

    I am a professor, and my best guess is that joanwz's experience was based on what subjects her professors taught.

    In general, the dryer and more factual the information in question is, the more likely it is to be accurate.

    For example, I once read an article in which science professors found that information about the biography of a 19th century scientist was was as or more accurate on Wikipedia than on Britanica.

    Basic pre-modern history is also likely to be accurate.

    Wikipedia should never be your main source, but it can be useful in getting background on topics of this kind.

    Three Tips:
    1. Carefully evaluate the number, authority, and date of the sources quoted by the article -- often an article will be roughly accurate, but not have up-to-date scholarship.
    In Jewish Studies, for example, many articles quote The Jewish Encyclopedia, which is a great source available on-line, but hardly cutting edge: it is out-of-copy-right because it's about 100 years old!

    2. Do not trust Wikipedia on controversial topics unless you are ALREADY quite knowledgable on the subject. For example, as a prof of religion, I can say that the article on the "Red Thread" a Jewish folk custom with kabbalistic roots, happens to be very good, but I know some other kabbalah topics on Wikipedia are silly or misinformed.

    3. A related point: The more recent, trendy or politicized the topic, the less Wikipedia is to be trusted.

    1. SidKemp profile image91
      SidKempposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      This is an excellent answer. I would add only one point - any encyclopedia should be used as background information on a topic, and not for information essential to your thesis. For that go to original (or scholarly secondary) sources.

    2. agusfanani profile image76
      agusfananiposted 5 years agoin reply to this

      Thank you very much for your in-depth answer. Those are useful tips and I'll use them in choosing a reference as a source of information.

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://hubpages.com/privacy-policy#gdpr

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)