Why is female circumcision abhorred but male circumcision praised?
I am not in favour of either.
Clitectomy is not circumcision and does not refer to my question.
I'm not sure why it's different. Particularly when both are usually done for cultural reasons.
I think that it is abhorred on females, because it is likely to be performed non-consentually, and basically makes them into a 'baby making' machine, leaving them with no enjoyment, prone to huge infections and even death.
Also - male circumcision is usually performed before the child remembers - as a baby, with pain relief etc. If it is performed as a right of passage for a male child growing into an adult - it is usually (note: USUALLY) with consent.
Female circumcision is usually not consentual (they are held down by elders), done when they are older enough to remember (somewhere after the age of about 7), and USUALLY involves clitectomy. Because in the cultures that perform it - is it about reducing the sensation of the clitoris as it can become enlarged and annoying the man (see this link: http://islamqa.info/en/45528 - medical benefits of female circumcision)
So when you say "Clictectomy is not circumcision" - its actually where it starts - Clitectomy is Type 1, it just gets worse from there.
This is from WHO:
1 - Clitoridectomy: partial or total removal of the clitoris (a small, sensitive and erectile part of the female genitals) and, in very rare cases, only the prepuce (the fold of skin surrounding the clitoris).
2 - Excision: partial or total removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, with or without excision of the labia majora (the labia are "the lips" that surround the vagina).
3 - Infibulation: narrowing of the vaginal opening through the creation of a covering seal. The seal is formed by cutting and repositioning the inner, or outer, labia, with or without removal of the clitoris.
4 - Other: all other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for non-medical purposes, e.g. pricking, piercing, incising, scraping and cauterizing the genital area.
( http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/ )
But, I don't believe in forcing someone to have either, nor stopping someone who WANTS it done - however, female is usually illegal (at least it is in NZ, we are actually helping women 'fix' their infibulation FGM)
Interesting questions today Oz
Male circumcision often results in permanent damage or worse but the UN doesnt ban it or comment on it.
Many avid opponents of "benign" female circumcision INSIST on male circumcision with the same vigour!
That I do understand, and I also understand that it is not always done in a Drs office - but can be done like Female Circ - out the back, with a sharp rock. I think it's the inability to enjoy sex that most people find abhorrent with FGM.
I am not talking about FGM. Thats a totally different question.
To put it another way why isnt male cicumcision seen as mutilation?
I agree re: male - yes, it should be. But what exactly do you mean then with female circ? As when googled "female circ" - FGM is what comes up. It is also exactly what is described in the "medical benefits of female circ" link. FGM is female circ.
Female circumcusion is the snipping off of excessive inner labia for so called medical reasons same as the excuse for male circumcusion.
Technically female circumcision is analogous to male circumcision and is removal of the prepuce which covers the glans in the male and the clitoris in the female. Male circumcision rarely has complications. Your information is bad.
you prove my point as you are suggesting male circumcision is OK but female is not.
I have to reiterate I am against both.
People abhor female genital mutilation, but it sounds like that is not what you are talking about. Being that female/male circumcision are equivalent, I don't know why anyone would abhor one over the other. The particular circumstances might be abhorrent (ie. without consent, at an older age, without proper medical procedures/facilities, reasons for the removal, etc.) but physically, it is the same piece of skin being removed.
There are Freudian explanations regarding this which are too complex to explain here.
So who exactly abhors female circumcision? I honestly don't know anyone or any group who does.
apparently the UN as well as most of the internet and public in the entire planet.
The dislike is for female genital manipulation, which is a much more severe set of procedures than is circumcision.
FGM aside medical circmsn is identical. Many people who are against Female Crcmcsn are all for male. eg in Africa.
by Dan Harmon 5 years ago
According to the article here, a Michigan doctor has been arrested and charged with the genital mutilation (18 U.S.C. 116) of two young girls, making false statements and other crimes. The "surgery" was apparently carried out in a Detroit clinic.Seems like a truly monumental battle...
by Phoebe Pike 11 years ago
It is cutting off nerves and skin off a man's body. Why is this accepted widely by so many? What is the religious reasoning behind all of this?
by ptosis 10 years ago
Don't you think circumcision of a male newborn is genital mutilation?google 'botched circumcision' & 2 words: "galloping gangrene". It'll keep you up at night for weeks.
by Emily Zeinert 8 years ago
Are you for against circumcision?What are your reasons for/against? Have you been aware of the #IAmNotThankful campaign?
by heavenbound5511 11 years ago
In numerous instances the Bible contains medical information that far predates man's actual discoveries of related principles in the field of medicine. The medical instructions given by Moses to the Israelites some 3500 years ago were not only far superior to the practices of contemporary cultures,...
by Julie Grimes 12 years ago
Why Are American Doctors Mutilating Girls? Is one of the lead blogging articles and stories on the Daily Beast today.http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- … =obnetworkIf you don't want to go to the website, it talks about female circumcision. The first paragraph reads, "The...
Copyright © 2022 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|