Paul McCartney - A Beatle to Boycott - A True Bug, a Backbiter

Jump to Last Post 1-10 of 10 discussions (66 posts)

60
KFlippinposted 13 years ago
Paul McCartney - how sick, how sad, how unbelievable, his crappy slur to Bush and to Laura on his high night in the White House. Not to mention Obama has all this time for entertainment right now? If it were Bush or any other Republican President he, or she, would be attacked like a hoard of biting, virus carrying mosquitos on the Louisiana coast, and Paul McCartney would keep his delicate arse well away from the action.
report
1. 79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Pretty strong words for someone with only 6 hubs and 17 followers.
  
  well make that 18, cuz Im one of those people who like to watch the degenerates.
  
  Listen -- A god mcartney is not -- neither is bush, neither is obama.
  
  and I do believe bush had plenty of time for sitting at his ranch and hiding from disasters while he was digging us into a hole of war and economic disaster.
  
  Is obama fixing it? maybe not. But it's hard to clean up such a big mess left behind.
  
  obviously youre one of those super right wing types. that's sad.
  
  The world is changing. constantly and there is no place in the big scheme of things for narrow minded idiots.
  
  just my 2c
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Really, and you have such great references and longevity. ROFL
  
  ROFL, again and again.......such insight.
  report
  61
  Doug Hughesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  "Pretty strong words for someone with only 6 hubs and 17 followers."
  
  I think she had 18, but MadamX is no more.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Getting desperate are you? I've noticed those of you dumbfounded reach for unfounded innuendo about other screen names, or however they're referred to here. As I recall, I pretty much liked Madame X's opinions, and will check to see if she is really gone, and I'll take that as a complement for now.
  report
  73
  Arthur Fontesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I know HP is a business.
  
  I would think that hubber retention is a sound business policy.
  But then gloating about chasing hubbers from the site makes an appearance.
  
  I just do not understand that?
  
  Makes me say Hmmmm?
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Who chased her away, and more importantly, how?
  report
  73
  Arthur Fontesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I think she explained herself in her hubs before she left.
  
  Unfortunately they are no longer published.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  This sounds like she voluntarily left, did she? Or did she leave in a huff, like some do, because she didn't like to be disagreed with? I guess I missed this drama!
  report
  73
  Arthur Fontesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  
  I dislike drama all together. I have no wish to prolong it.
  
  I just had to point out the obvious.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Interesting.
  report
  61
  Doug Hughesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Randy - I will explain the obvious. She shot herself in the foot until she ran out of feet. First she accused me of being a government paid blogger sent to disrupt the hubs. That got her banned from the forums.
  
  She wrote a hub complaining that HP was in a conspiracy (with me presumabley) to suppress conservatives. I don't know if that had anything to do with her departure or not. But HP may have decided that if telling lies about me justified a ban from the forums, telling lies about HP deserved the big delete.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Oh yeah, I remember what a wacko she was now. I remember some of that thread and wondered at the time if she realized how stupid that accusation was.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Lastly, you speculated she left in a huff because she was disagreed with. Yet, originally, here in this post, you speculate she was chased away. Hmmmm. That would be two very different scenarios, and you do seem to have a great interest in exploring Doogie's lame attempt to discredit me as an imposter.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Arthur inferred she was chased away, KFO. Read his post before accusing me of speculation. I asked a question. You are speculating, not me!
  report
  61
  Doug Hughesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I don't think I ever suggested you are an imposter.
  
  It's an intereting suggetion - but you made it.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Doogie wrote: "Pretty strong words for someone with only 6 hubs and 17 followers."
  
  I think she had 18, but MadamX is no more.
  
  ********
  
  Well, ewwwwwwwww, maybe the rest of us have oil sludge in the brain, while yours is an oil slick on a different plane of mechanics. Yeah, must be, because that is clearly an 'imposter' innuendo. You must be quite HP confident considering the Madame X knowledge you have shared with us all below, must be nice. Good for you, always good to have an in for short period in a human life of toil or toll or tole.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  You forgot poll! And did I speculate about Madame X being chased away like you said? Or did you read back and find out the truth? You seem to disregard questions you do not wish to answer. And this is not innuendo!
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  ??? Darn, you somehow see a difference between what you said about poor Madame X and someone else's interpretation of that as her being 'chased away' by the likes of you? And anyone would wonder that both would refrain in one's mind on a quick read as both reflect the same essence? Or should I approach hub pages as though I'm working on my doctorate? I would agree that I do need to work on my brilliance at short term memory, or perhaps get a teleprompter.
  
  You think I've created a criminal offense by your saying she couldn't take being diagreed with and left in a huff and my recalling you said later she was chased away, when one and the both are the same? Don't you have more important points to iterate and explore? Guess not. Do forgive me. But both references to Madam X are essentially the same, and clearly on review, the last is a reiteration and re-speak of your own innuendo by another fallible human with pretty spot-on reading abilities.
  
  Shew, how tiresome, and have you yet commentd on McCartney's worming and squirming in an un-exterminated room in the White House? Or did I overlook that? Nite.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  And you seem to think it is fine to accuse me of something someone else said. It is not my problem that you can't seem to understand who said what. Once again for the hard of thinking, Arthur implied X was chased away? I asked if she was banned or left in a huff.
  
  You accused me of speculating about both instances. Learn to read or admit when you make a mistake. And I never suggested she was chased away by "the likes of me." All of this was screwed up by your lack of comprehension or simply because can't remember who said what. In this, you do remind me of "poor" ex X!
  
  And now you say "you think I've committed a criminal offense!"
  I said nothing of the sort to you. Why can't you post without making up stuff? Are you capable of this? I certainly hope you were not referring to yourself re the "pretty spot-on reading abilities." That would be too sad for words. And as for you and your doctorate, better get it at Pat Robertsons facility if you don't want to be disappointed. LOL!
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Chased away? Does she not have free will?
  
  Madame X liked to dish it out but she couldn't take it.
  report
  73
  Arthur Fontesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  We must be participating in different forums.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Hi Arthur. Same forums, different perspective.
  report
2. 85
  rebekahELLEposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  report
82
Rafiniposted 13 years ago
????

And what is this all about??
report
1. 60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Oh, gee, I guess he sang Oh Michelle at the White House and the Happy Couple goo gooed and gaa gaaed at each other, and then McCartney trashed George Bush as not even knowing how to find a library, all last night in a big Doo Doo at the White House -- among other slurs. Don't recall McCartney slogging it out in Lousiana during Rita either, do recall Obama trashing Bush for being slow to respond to a flood that no one coud foresee, don't recall Obama being in LA for that disaster either -- just his criticism well after the fact.
  
  Boycott McCartney - I just may have a bumper sticker made with that.
  report
  79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  "the flood nobody could foresee" -- was predicted 2 weeks ahead of time. lol.
  
  Bush deserves the critisicm he gets. He wasn't a good president. That is just a simple fact.
  
  I don't necessarily think Obama is a great president either, Im just saying it's pretty ridiculous to get all rowled up over some shit a former Beatle said.
  
  So paul mccartney doesn't like bush. Not many people do. He ruined our image with the rest of the world and caused a lot of chaos. Then he turned his back and never apologized for all the wrong he did.
  
  just a simple fact.
  
  I think this rabid "obama hatred" is just as asinine as the rabid bush hatred on the other side.
  
  grow up.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  You are more worried about our 'image with the world' than you are about your own country? Noted
  
  And no, it's not ridiculous, I do love that word ridiculous, to get 'all rowled up' (that would be 'riled' I'm fairly sure) over Paul McCartney's party down, and more especially the Obama's party down, while a significant part of this country is in an oily crisis -- are you aware of the extent of that? Perhaps not.
  
  And I would beg to differ in regard to 'not many people' like Bush, and that would be a grievous Liberal mistake that I sincerely hope continues to be made.
  
  Enjoying your life without another 911 since 911?
  report
  79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Fear breeds ignorance breeds hatred
  
  I typed rowled as a southern accent, fwiw
  
  We are a western civilization and people who are against western morals will always have a reason to attack.
  
  People who preach 911 all over the place are nothing more than the same people who brought you the good ol' "duck & cover" propaganda.
  
  Have fun slurping down your sheep soup. Get bloated on fear.
  
  Maybe if our image was better, as in diplomatic relations, less people would feel compelled to attack us.
  
  if you want to show a gov. endorsed statistic showing who likes who I would be willing to debate it with you.
  
  The oil crisis isn't anyone's fault but the people who negated to fix their subpar materials (BP) and they will pay dearly for it if the republicans would stop intervening -- they support the big oil that is killing the area after all.
  
  Im not worried about our country. We're taken care of quite well. Funny how bush couldn't stop the attacks but the present administration has foiled several.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Apparently you haven't spent much time in the south, never heard anyone say 'riled' up in a 'rowled' accent, maybe I'm to far east.
  
  "Have fun slurping down your sheep soup. Get bloated on fear." Right back at you darling!
  
  The rest of your post, rhetoric, and empty at that. Unbelievable, you are already working on a reason the oil spil is Bush's fault. What a fairy tale leftist world.
  report
  79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Grew up in the south actually -- the deep south near the gulf. And this disaster with BP is very upsetting to me.
  
  But even I am not infantile enough to go and blame a line of presidents for some crazy crap that has nothing to do with them. I do think, however, its a good reason to stop pursuing offshore drilling. It's a no-brainer.
  
  If my decision to type a word with a faux accent is that perplexing to you, perhaps you should get yourself a vibrator, or a friend for the night.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I don't think she has but one choice!
  
  Strike two!
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Hello.......you are the infantile one placing Presidential blame, perhaps you should re-read your own faux blarney, and do keep in mind your repeated personal attacks.
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  LOL! I like you, CK. Let me take this opportunity to say hello.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Hiccupping with hysterical ROFL! Joy, oh Joy, life is good! Sleep well!
  report
  0
  PrettyPantherposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you for your good wishes, K. Your sincerity and kindness is touching. You sleep well, too.
  report
  61
  Doug Hughesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  "Enjoying your life without another 911 since 911?"
  
  Only a wingnut would take credit for what didn't happen - while not taking the blame for what DID happen.
  
  There was plenty of warning prior to 911 which Bush and Co. did not act on . No one knows if decisive action in advance would have prevented it, but what is known is that the White House was warned and did NOT act. 911 happened on Bush's watch. Ignoring that fact AND taking credit for what didn't happen is sheer lunacy.
  
  It's like Ford Theatre bragging that only one president ever got shot there.
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Only a WingDing would continue to post irrelevant and unrespected crap full of wingnut labels to bolster their unsupportable words.
  
  And if you believe what you write, you really ought to take it up with Clinton -- shouldn't Bush have blamed 911 on Clinton and done a jam up good advertising job to ensure it settled in the American psyche that he 'inherited' 911. LOL
  report
  59
  tony0724posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Actually Clinton had the crosshairs on Osama and did not pull the trigger. Think it might have been a different world had he ?
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  This was just propaganda from a movie! Didn't you hear about it?
  report
  59
  tony0724posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  It was also on a special on a documentary I saw on the Discovery channel.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  And what was the reason for Clinton letting him go? After all, wasn't he part of the Royal family who is so close to Bush Sr.?
  
  Clinton laughed when asked about this reported incident and said he would have given permission for the shot if the incident had been true.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  This is what she does, CK. I think it's termed "KFlippin out." Again! LOL!
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Terribly empty statement, not much strike.
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  How did you feel about the way Dumbya handled Katrina, KFO? Did you rant and rave on and on like you do about Obama?
  
  Strike one!
  report
  60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Have you any idea of the history of flooding on the Mississippi River, in Louisiana? Have you any idea of the history of that? Of the respect and joint effort of our ancestors of that very thing? That they got the heck out if they could? Rescued the rest themselves. Didn't think so.
  
  Did anyone have a clue the sophisticated 20th century levies in LA wouldn't hold? No, no one excepting the engineers that built them possibly.
  
  I'm surrounded by thousands of FEMA trailers from Katrina, are you?
  
  Should berms already be in place, and more being built, on the federal dime, to protect the wetlands of the Gulf Coast from this quite new 21st century disaster. You are damx right.
  
  Glad we agree.
  report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 13 years ago
Don't you know that Obama should be working 24 hours a day, 7 days a week?

No time for a life...no time for culture...no time for music...

I'm sure KF does follows that rule too.

Paul McCartney had the audacity to employ freedom of speech, how dare he?
report
1. 72
  lorlie6posted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Thank you, Uninvited Writer.
  report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 13 years ago
It was Clinton's fault...

I have said it before, you can blame Clinton, Carter, even FDR for what the US is now, but you can't blame Bush because he isn't president anymore
report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 13 years ago
She is blaming BP...as it should be.

Too bad they put a limit on the liability of oil companies for oil spills...
report
1. 60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  There shouldn't be a limit on their liability, and so far as I'm concerned, they should not have been allowed, or directed, to drill that deep without a pretty good game plan to plug a well running wild, and that would be government failure at it's worst.
  report
  82
  Rafiniposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  agreed.
  report
  80
  Uninvited Writerposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  No one should be allowed to drill that deeply unless they know exactly how to stop leaks if something drastic happens.
  report
2. 79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  for sure
  report
80
Uninvited Writerposted 13 years ago
How old was the oil rig?

I looked it up...it was built in 2001. So...you are actually blaming Bush for this?

Strike two?
report
1. 80
  Uninvited Writerposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Strike 3?
  report
  61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  She's out!
  report
70
sunforgedposted 13 years ago
McCartney is about as close to a God as you get.

and Dubya isnt even worth mentioning anymore except for in jokes

and the Federal response to Katrina, even now, is pitiful
report
1. 60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  ROFL, do tell us more.
  report
73
Arthur Fontesposted 13 years ago
Wow this thread spun out of control quickly.

Paul Mccartney has the right to say anything he wants, just as I do.

I think sir mccartney is a disrespectful twit. Not that I own anything outside of beatles albums, I would never spend a dime towards sir paul.
report
1. 60
  KFlippinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  Love the Beatles, always and forever, and agree about McCartney, particularly now, and never will spend a nickel on him.
  report
2. 61
  Randy Godwinposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  I bet if Paul knew this, it would make him sad, Arthur!
  
  Hey Arthur, don't make Paul sad
  
  Take a sad song, and make it better-er-er
  
  Remember, to let him into your heart
  
  Then you'll know, you'll make it feel better
  
  Better, better, better
  report
  73
  Arthur Fontesposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  At least I am realistic of what I have control over. LOL
  report
  79
  CkhoffmanKposted 13 years agoin reply to this
  The world is full of em though (twits)
  report
79
CkhoffmanKposted 13 years ago
I don't know what all I am replying too here.. beh...
report
83
donotfearposted 13 years ago
I understand the negative rage about McCartney. Not just his words, just .period. I don't know what he did that was so great to be knighted by the queen of England. They need to knight some of the humanitarians who actually DO something.....like feed and care for sick people in a sweltering tent in the middle of a humid jungle. Now THAT'S love.

God bless Mother Theresa! She shoulda been knighted!
report

Closed to reply

jump to first post

Necessary
HubPages Device ID	This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
Login	This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google Recaptcha	This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
Akismet	This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google Analytics	This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic Pixel	This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web Services	This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
Cloudflare	This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted Libraries	Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)

Features
Google Custom Search	This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google Maps	Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google Charts	This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host API	This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTube	Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Vimeo	Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Paypal	This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Login	You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Maven	This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)

Marketing
Google AdSense	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClick	Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index Exchange	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Sovrn	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook Ads	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexus	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Openx	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon Project	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLift	This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say Media	We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing Pixels	We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking Pixels	We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.

Statistics
Author Google Analytics	This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
Comscore	ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking Pixel	Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
Clicksco	This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)

Paul McCartney - A Beatle to Boycott - A True Bug, a Backbiter

Arts and Design

Autos

Books, Literature, and Writing

Business and Employment

Education and Science

Entertainment and Media

Family and Parenting

Fashion and Beauty

Food and Cooking

Games, Toys, and Hobbies

Gender and Relationships

Health

Holidays and Celebrations

Home and Garden

HubPages Tutorials and Community

Personal Finance

Pets and Animals

Politics and Social Issues

Religion and Philosophy

Sports and Recreation

Technology

Travel and Places

About Us

This website uses cookies

Paul McCartney - A Beatle to Boycott - A True Bug, a Backbiter

Related Discussions

This website uses cookies