Stephen Hawkins said so
Dear me,
Are you having a bad day or something? Who said nothing exists that we can not prove?
The simple fact is that most scientific knowledge points to the fact that we do not need a "supreme entity," in order for the Universe to have come into existence.
This is also strong suggestion that there is not a supreme entity and certainly there is plenty of proven scientific facts to show that the one your goat herders wrote about does not exist.
All you are really demonstrating is lack of understanding and knowledge - both of what Hawking (not Hawkins) actually said and the conclusions it is possible to draw from that. I mean - you cannot even get the man's name right. You are getting more desperate with each thread you start.
Having doubts are we?
If there are extra dimensions, we have no proof of it other than inference. I believe the general idea of this being the case is accepted, but not proven.
Therefore, God and all matters Spiritual are likewise (theoretically) possible. Whether or not you believe it is up to you, for either proposition. It still come down to faith.
That rotton word!!! Causes so much upset here in these forums . .
The same could be said about unicorns and leprechauns. I can't prove they exist and you can't prove they don't exist. Therefore, you must believe in unicorns and leprechauns using the same logic.
In other words, you are free to contradict yourself no matter how absurd, irrational or impossible it may seem.
If you are shown how utterly absurd, irrational and impossible it is to freely believe in one thing and not the other, you certainly are required to show me the proof.
Perhaps, you're not aware of the Burden of Proof fallacy in which the claimant is supposed to provide the proof. One does make a statement of belief and then expect everyone else to run around proving him right.
No one is excluding anything except your imaginary friend who wrote a book explaining what was going to come to pass.
The fact that there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever of a source from outside our system of logic is a good reason for discounting it.
You on the other hand claim to have certain knowledge. You even claim this outside source sent its only son to earth.
And then you speak of logic. Too funny.
No. It means exactly what I said.
I was merely pointing out that you actually got everything wrong. Including the name of the man you were quoting as having said something you did not understand.
Smells like desperation from here.
This makes no sense at all.
Yes it would appear to at first glance, but in reality you have theories and empirical evidence about the source of religiosity that strongly indicates that the mechanism can be understood.
On the other hand we have a ridiculous myth that remains without any proof of any sort ever with a blatant agenda.
Related Discussions
- 710
Does anyone have any evidence for the existence of God?
Does anyone have any evidence for the existence of God?I am an atheist, which to me only means that I haven't been shown requisite evidence to convince me of an omnipotent, all-knowing deity of any kind. If you would, please bring forth this evidence and deliver me from a fiery...
- 56
Big Bang proves the EXISTENCE of God!
What was before Big Bang? Scientists have the following idea-"According to their calculations, time and space had a finite beginning that corresponded to the origin of matter and energy."3 The singularity didn't appear in space; rather, space began inside of the singularity. Prior to the...
- 292
Why do atheists take the bible so literal?
Why do atheists take the bible so literal?In their effort to disprove God many atheists are as extreme as the religious fanatics they claim to be against. They take passages literally and claim they cannot believe in such a God. One who kills and is cruel. Why not see it...
- 986
When a non-believer says they have looked God, how did they do it?
We hear often of atheists claiming that have looked for evidence of God but can find none but what would convince them? How do they go about investigating? How do they expect believers to prove it to them when it can only be proved to oneself and not by another?
- 241
'God did not create the universe'- Stephen Hawking
God didn't create the universe -- it was actually a result of the inevitable laws of physics, British physicist Prof Stephen Hawking has concluded.In his latest book, The Grand Design, Hawking said: "Because there is a law such as gravity, the Universe can and will create itself from nothing....
- 639
Who has the best argument about God's existence?
Who can post the best argument about the existence or the non-existence of God and can support their answers using real logic? Don't use faith based logic when proving the existence of God.