http://www.nytimes.com/2013/06/04/world … odayspaper
The activist was arrested because "calling Mr. Morsi a killer and criminal...could undermine state security."
Our own government increasingly invokes "national security" to justify many of its activities, such as keeping people in prison indefinitely. I wonder if calling a president a killer and criminal will, in the future, lead to arrest. All anti-war groups would be "breaking the law," as would anyone who held a particularly corrupt president to account.
Can't really speak for Egyptian laws, courts or charges, but in the US the President would most definitely have a case if anyone published a claim that (s)he was a "killer" and "criminal".
It would not be for national security reasons, though - just as the article says there has been a rise in libel suits in Egypt that that's what it would be in the US as well. Whether President or Joe Blow on the street, such statements are illegal to make unless they are true and provable.
Are you calling our Vice President "Joe Blow on the Street" Wilderness?
That's borderline libelous. You could get in big trouble!!!
Never! I only libel blondes with skimpy costumes and capes that fly through the sky.
It's not slander if it's true...
Guilty as charged. No doubt!
Political speech is protected, even if false, as ruled in 1964 by the Supreme Court. In this case, that's the right call.
Hey Sooner. How r u doing today?
I am not so sure political speech is always protected even if false. It is my interpretation of New York Times Co. v. Sullivan (1964) that, in order to prevail, the plaintiff must prove the defamer knew the statements were false and proceeded with “actual malice.”
“The Court held that a public official suing for defamation must prove that the statement in question was made with actual malice, which in this context refers to knowledge or reckless lack of investigation.” {1}
What is most significant about this Supreme Court ruling is the burden of proof was shifted from the accused to the plaintiff. “The rule that somebody alleging defamation should have to prove untruth, rather than that the defendant should have to prove the truth of a statement, stood as a departure from the previous common law.”
{2}
Is your understanding different?
{1} http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_T … ._Sullivan
{2} Ibid
"The Court held that the First Amendment protects the publication of all statements, even false ones, about the conduct of public officials except when statements are made with actual malice (with knowledge that they are false or in reckless disregard of their truth or falsity). Under this new standard, Sullivan's case collapsed."
You pretty much can't prove malice at all. In fact, even trying to do censors free speech. What if a politician sues a blogger, and the blogger was simply citing information from World Net Daily they thought was true? Is the government the truth police? And political opponents in a campaign slander and libel each other non-stop. There's no way to really enforce this.
And, like you pointed out, the "burden is shifted from the accused to the plaintiff. So not only do I have to prove you KNOWINGLY lied with "malice in your heart," but also you must disprove my allegations against you!
Looking deeper into this.."In the landmark 1964 case of New York Times v. Sullivan, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain defamatory statements were protected by the First Amendment. The case involved a newspaper article that said unflattering things about a public figure, a politician. The Court pointed to "a profound national commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust, and wide-open." The Court acknowledged that in public discussions -- especially about public figures like politicians -- mistakes can be made. If those mistakes are "honestly made," the Court said, they should be protected from defamation actions. The court made a rule that public officials could sue for statements made about their public conduct only if the statements were made with "actual malice." http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/ … 29718.html
I think I disagree with the ruling. Public officials are of a different type, and speech, especially political, cannot be censored in a truly free society.
However, as to my point about whether the politician suing for libel would have a real case, my original point stands. It's highly unlikely the court would rule in favor of a politician.
You also failed to address my point about natural security at all.
'National security' - a hypnotist's trigger that disables critical thinking.
Unfortunately true, on both sides of the fence. An almost automatic response to request for information to many, an almost automatic response to denial of information to many others.
by Credence2 7 days ago
Republicans always want to take a mile when they are given an inch. Conservatives cheer with the overturn of Roe vs Wade, saying it was a victory for States Rights. So the Red States double down creating a Handsmaiden's Tale environment for its residents. But that has not been enough. Trump remains...
by Credence2 19 months ago
Revealing article suggesting Trump new line of defense or an excuse, depending on your point of view. This man continues to be the gift that keeps on giving. This is the stuff of Norman Lear sitcoms...Just how stupid does the Trump defense team think that everyone is?The prosecutors are going to...
by Readmikenow 6 weeks ago
Gaetz, Stefanik offer resolution declaring Trump ‘did not engage in insurrection’Reps. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) and Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) unveiled a resolution Tuesday that declares former President Trump “did not engage in insurrection or rebellion against the United States.”The resolution — which...
by ptosis 7 years ago
http://thehill.com/policy/national-secu … o-congress18 minutes from now. For those who are interested.FBI Director James Comey and National Security Agency head Adm. Michael Rogers on Monday will break their public silence in the House Intelligence Committee's investigation into...
by Arthur Russ 21 minutes ago
In a true democracy there should be a separation of powers between the Juridical, Executive and Legislature. No democracy is perfect, but how imperfect is the American democracy?While browsing the web in relation to a question on the Separation of Powers in the USA (in another forum) I...
by Scott Belford 9 hours ago
The Conservatives on the Supreme Court stuck a knife in the back of all Americans with their decision to ignore stare decises and overturn Roe. Besides stripping women of a fundemental right to control their own body (now, in some states, a 13-year old rape victim with be FORCED to carry the...
Copyright © 2024 The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of The Arena Platform, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. The Arena Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
Copyright © 2024 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective owners.
As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.
For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy
Show DetailsNecessary | |
---|---|
HubPages Device ID | This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons. |
Login | This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service. |
Google Recaptcha | This is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy) |
Akismet | This is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Google Analytics | This is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy) |
HubPages Traffic Pixel | This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized. |
Amazon Web Services | This is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy) |
Cloudflare | This is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Hosted Libraries | Javascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy) |
Features | |
---|---|
Google Custom Search | This is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Maps | Some articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Google Charts | This is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy) |
Google AdSense Host API | This service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Google YouTube | Some articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Vimeo | Some articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy) |
Paypal | This is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Login | You can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy) |
Maven | This supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy) |
Marketing | |
---|---|
Google AdSense | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Google DoubleClick | Google provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Index Exchange | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Sovrn | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Facebook Ads | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Unified Ad Marketplace | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
AppNexus | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Openx | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Rubicon Project | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
TripleLift | This is an ad network. (Privacy Policy) |
Say Media | We partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy) |
Remarketing Pixels | We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites. |
Conversion Tracking Pixels | We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service. |
Statistics | |
---|---|
Author Google Analytics | This is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy) |
Comscore | ComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy) |
Amazon Tracking Pixel | Some articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy) |
Clicksco | This is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy) |