|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
When you "cross" (90 degrees) two high-quality polarizing lenses, what happens?
Now, what happens when you put a third polarizing lens between the first two at a random (but unequal) angle with respect to the first to lenses? And can you explain why?
With the first two lenses, you'd filter out essentially all of the incoming light. Adding the intermediate third lens would allow some of the light to pass through. Sorry; I can visualize it, but I can't explain it.
Ding ding ding! You are correct, Sir! I'm pleased that someone else was awake during physics class, too.
The last part of the question, how and why it works that way, we'll leave to someone else: you've gotten us off the ground.
The explanation of the paradox is due to the fact that polarizing lenses don't "filter" in the normal sense of the word, they reduce the strength of light that passes through according to the angle of the light source and the angle of orientation of the lens.
To illustrate, suppose the first two lenses are at angles of 0 degrees and 90 degrees, and that the middle lens is oriented at x degrees with x between 0 and 90.
In the two-lens case, when light at an angle of z passes through the first lens (0 degrees, horizontal) the vertical component of the light is flattened. When that now horizontal light passes through the second lens (90 degrees, vertical) the horizontal component of the light is flattened and only the magnitude of the vertical component matters. But at this point, after having passed through the first lens, there is no vertical component, therefore the magnitude of the output light is 0, no light at all.
In the three-lens case, when the light passes through the lens oriented 0 degress and then the lens oriented x degrees (in the middle), the intensity of the light reduces to cos(x) of its original intensity. After it passes through the middle lens, the light still has some horizontal and vertical component. Finally, when it passes through the last lens (90 degrees) the intensity is reduced by sin(x). So the net reduction in strength is cos(x)*sin(x).
If you choose x = 45 degrees for the middle lens, then the reduction is cos(45)*sin(45) = 0.5. So the light is reduced to 50% of its original strength.
Excellent proof! You must be a professor, genius, over-educated unit of the general public, or all of these. :-) Larry's answer got us off to a great start, and yours fleshed out the details. Congrats and thanks! I selected this as the Best Answer!
Fascinating - I did not know abut the effect of adding the third lens. This means that the light leaving the 1st lens has its horizontal component eliminated at the lens, but it is somewhat restored before it reaches the intermediate lens, I think.
SidKemp--It boggles the mind, doesn't it? The 3rd, odd-angled filter introduces a perpendicular component back in to the mix because photons are not just waves or just particles, but rather hybrids of both: waveicles. Cool!
by Paul Edmondson36 hours ago
How do you remove scratches from Ray Ban sunglasses?The lenses on my Ray Ban sunglasses are scratched and I want to repair them.
by dappledesigns13 months ago
What is the best lens for indoor church wedding photography?
by Raye3 years ago
I've just started going through the first lenses that got ported over as Hubs and here're a few things you can expect when you start reviewing your imported content.First of all, my lenses are still all showing on my...
by PaulaHenry17 years ago
Curious if it is worth your time, I ran across info on it and didn't know if we could benefit from it.
by Silver Rose6 years ago
See this article where they say they are experimenting with staff accounts:http://www.squidoohq.com/2011/09/13/wer … -accounts/I think they are prompted by the fact that HP appears to be slowly moving out of teh...
by Emily Tack3 years ago
I could not find an answer, searching the forums. On our Lenses that were transferred to HubPages, there are quite a few comments that mention Squidoo. If the word Squidoo isn't actually mentioned, often there will be...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.