We're not 37th anyway. Everyone quotes that ranking but no one can even begin to explain the underlying data. We've tried to get clarification from several people who post on this forum, but they insist that "They are the source" and we should just accept the ranks as gospel.
Here's the ranking: http://www.photius.com/rankings/healthranks.html
Here's the spreadsheet behind the ranking:http://www.photius.com/rankings/world_health_systems.html
Here's the WHO report: http://www.photius.com/rankings/who_wor … ranks.html
The data appears to be somehow goal-related and the ranks appear to be driven by how those goals are met. Or not. The column headings don't mean anything. The rightmost column appears to be where the "37th" comes from but how it's calculated is a mystery. Anyone who uses the ranking to make their point should be able to explain how it's calculated.
Since no one else will explain why they are using this number to impugn the US health care system, I'll try to analyze the WHO report.
"The World Health Report says the main failings of many health systems are:
Many health ministries focus on the public sector and often disregard the frequently much larger private sector health care."
From this we see that the WHO prefers a socialist system. They endorse governmental control of the private sector.
"In many countries, some if not most physicians work simultaneously for the public sector and in private practice. This means the public sector ends up subsidizing unofficial private practice."
In the US it's the other way-round. Doctors are underpaid by Medicare and Medicaid; they make up the difference through their official private practice. The US doesn't generally restrict MDs from practicing in both arenas.
"One key recommendation from the report is for countries to extend health insurance to as large a percentage of the population as possible. WHO says that it is better to make "pre-payments" on health care as much as possible, whether in the form of insurance, taxes or social security."
So the WHO is obviously biased toward the socialized approach. In my mind, that taints their rankings. They didn't start from a neutral position.
In other words, why believe the incredibly well respected 'World' Health Organisation, when we could set up an 'American' Health Organisation and manipulate the figures to show us as 1st?
Nicomp please say Ryan is wrong ,yer not wishing that are you??
Maybe because our system is an exlusionary system. Our pirvate insurance exclude those with chronic diseases such as diabetes. I know, I'm diabetic. My insurance will cover screening but not the medications or other products I need to control my disease.
Maybe because we are the MOST obese industrial nation Ranking number 9 on Forbes list of obese nations. But if Ledefensetech is right, we have a massive food shortage coming so we'll all thin out soon.
Maybe the costs of our health system is too heavily taxed by people who have no means to private insurance such as the illegal population here.
I don't doubt and all that we're ranked 37th in health systems.
by marymootoo 6 years ago
The public sector unions have threatend mass stike action over pensions, do you think that this is the right thing to do? Is it fair that in the present climate for a group of people to inflict the threat of misery for personal gain?
by JON EWALL 7 years ago
Just recently a report came out regarding employment.The report stated that the average pay in the private market was $40.00/hr. and the average pay in the public sector was $70/hr.In the public sector the fringe benefits also are higher.Could it be that in the public sector 50% of the workers are...
by Stacie L 6 years ago
Doctors in America are harboring an embarrassing secret: Many of them are going broke.This quiet reality, which is spreading nationwide, is claiming a wide range of casualties, including family physicians, cardiologists and oncologists.Industry watchers say the trend is worrisome. Half of all...
by pisean282311 8 years ago
for me it is hollow talks , corruption and dividing people..
by karl 4 years ago
There has been another round of public sector strikes here in the UK with Firefighters, local government workers and teachers (depending on which Union they belong to) amongst the 500,000 - 1,000,000 workers ( depending on who you ask) who decided not to attend work today. Their grievances...
by My Esoteric 3 years ago
"It was because of the self-interest of [certain] individuals or groups of producers were often at odds with the public interest that the proper task of legislatures who are concerned with the public interest to prevent individuals or groups of people from short-circuiting the market...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|