Can "old age" theoretically correct nearsightedness?
Has anyone ever heard of, or is it theoretically possible that "old age" could correct myopia (nearsightedness) to 20/20?
Most often, age doesn't not improve the condition or ability of the eye muscles to change focus. While it's not impossible that someone's eyes could become less nearsighted as they age, it's highly improbable.
A significant amount of seniors wear bifocal glasses, which offer correction for both near and far sight.
Beginning in my 30's, my nearsightedness began to correct itself more and more every 2 years or so. A few years ago, my astigmatism also disappeared and that made my opthalmologist scratch his head and recheck my eyes. Astigmatisim is gone! He does not know why
As we age our eye loses its elasticity to focus. This is why people with hyperopia (long sight) eventually need glasses to read. People with short sight (myopia) are also affected by the loss of elasticity in focusing. This condition is called presbyopia. Aging won't "correct" your eyes to 20/20 but refractive surgery MAY be able to. You might want to take a look at my two laser eye surgery hubs.
Myopia is the result of too much curviture of the eye's lens. Hyperopia is where the lens of the eye doesn't curve enough. Astigmatism is where the lens of either or both eyes is curved a bit unevenly.
Patty's situation is unusual--wonderful, as a matter of fact. Most people with myopia (short sightedness) just need to correct their prescription for glasses or contacts. Or get laser surgery if all other conditions of their eyes allow it.
When (if) you get cataract surgery (where an ophthalmologist replaces the lenses in your eyes), you can get adjustments to each new lens that will help you see better close up and far away. Always check with an eye specialist, preferrably an ophthalmologist.
Wow - very informative responses. I had forgotten about the elasticity thing. I'm just wondering if I sjhould think about investing in a pair of bi-focals. Yeesh! 39 years old, folks!
The thing is - I'm nearsighted (myopic) - and unevenly to boot. My left eye is someting like 20/140 and my right maybe 20/100ish. And both are (supposedly) astigmatic.
I have a pair of weaker glasses that I prefer to use when computing and/or reading. Otherwise, like at the grocery store - I'm the guy who's looking over the top of his glasses (voracious label reader), or with specks in one hand and box of whatever in the other, and even every once in a while with one of the temple arms in my mouth as I am comparing ounces to price of one item and cross multiplying in my head to see which is the cheaper ratio!
Yeah yeah, pipe down with your chuckles. I'm a geek - I know this. Rather fitting of the discussion, no?
Hey - woah - wait a sec? Presbyopia isn't farsightedness? That's hyperopia? And presbyopia is "old guy vision" (the loss of elasticity whether myopic or hyperopic?
Cool - I learned something today. Thanks, folks.
by aka-dj 8 years ago
We all know how to recognize life, and death. I have heard that modern medical science does not understand why we age and die. Cellular structure and reproduction "should" theoretically go on and on. So why does it not?
by Stephanie Bradberry 5 years ago
Is it a good idea to break up my long and well performing hubs into two or more?I notice that most of my well performing hubs are long ones about literature. Would I be able to boost earning potential if I broke these into two or three hubs? Some of these articles and essays are over 1,000 words...
by Missing Link 8 months ago
If a color comes up 2 out of 12 spins how many would it theoretically come up per 27 spins?My son is working on math that is way beyond me now that am 49-have been out of school for so long. He spun a wheel with a number of colors 12 times and green came up twice and orange once. ...
by Shawn Gourley 8 years ago
Is it not the duty of elected officals of congress to listen to its people?
by Oztinato 2 years ago
How can the speed of light be theoretically squared in Einsteins equation ?Yes we all know C squared gives a new number in Einstein's equation. But squaring the speed of light even theoretically is theoretically impossible.
by mrpotavin 4 years ago
Can we travel back in time without affecting the future?Quantum superposition holds that a physical system exists partly in all particular, theoretically possible states, which makes me think that we can theoretically go back in time and it would have no impact on the future because it is already a...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|