Looking at the new publishing rules on this site and some others that require a picture to be featured does it make you think the article has less value? I read both and I don't go looking to see if they have a picture or not. It matters not to me.
sort by best latest
I do know what you speak of. I would rather get a picture in my mind by the writings than a picture that limits what my imagination can get. HP wants more pictures in articles bcus they think it is better quality. U and I don't think so.
Let me try again. Some folks are such bad ass writers that they have following of over 1K and they do not need no stinking photos. Some folks like me kind of need them cuz I just can't paint the picture with my words. If you hub kicks butt without...
It's HP that is doing the penalizing if one doesn't have many pictures on a hub by rating it lower on the feature scale.
Let me try one more time. Really great writers do not need them on some hubs. Their traffic and popularity do not require any fluff. Some of us need it. If you get really low scores, a photo could help you. Not lack of photo hurt you. It is a bonus.
I agree with the video thing.
I like pictures 2, but those of us who don't have pictures or lots of them should not be penalized because we don't. Rating them less quality is like a punishment IMHO.