What do you think of book series and stories that end on a hook?

1. 87

   Marisa Wrightposted 8 years ago

   I agree.  I recently read a spy thriller which was a good story, but the MAIN "hook" of the story - the thing that had kept me reading all the way through - was not resolved.
   
   This particular author hasn't even written the next book yet, and apparently he averages one book per year. So if I want to find out the solution, I can pre-order his next book.   
   
   I am tempted to write and tell him what he can do with it.

   replyreport
   1. 86

      GA Andersonposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      Hello Marisa Wright,
      
      Even though I agree with most of Tess' points, I am not sure if I can agree with her thought that the plot is more important than the character, maybe, but I am not sure.
      
      My only purely escapist reading has been primarily Tom Clancy's books, (although John Jakes writings are also on the top of my list of enjoyable reads). And although I do enjoy the theme of his plots, it is the recurring main characters that keep me waiting for his next book.
      
      Luckily for me, Mr. Clancy doesn't leave me hanging with an ending "hook." If he did, then I would be shooting off multiples of those emails you refer to.
      
      GA

      replyreport
      1. 87

         Marisa Wrightposted 8 years agoin reply to this

         I think the point Tess is making is that a book should have the plot as the driving force, rather than the plot being derived from the need to fix one character's flawed personality.
         
         I have to say, this is one of the things that annoys me about modern Romance genre stories.  Nowadays you're not allowed to have two people just kept apart by circumstances or events.  They must each have some kind of personal problem that must be fixed before they can have a successful relationship.
         
         In other words, both the hero and the heroine must "go on a journey"...

         replyreport
         1. 86

            GA Andersonposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Hello again Marisa, I have a question.
            
            You mention  "Romance genre." Is that a popular read for you?
            
            I know it may show the chauvinism of my generation, or maybe just a narrowness of interests, but I don't think I have ever read a "romance" novel. Is that a popular female reader's choice? I think so, or I wouldn't have asked, but a chance for confirmation would make me more secure in my opinion.
            
            And just to further the discussion; couldn't the importance of character inclusion to a reader, (as in my enjoyment of Clancy's Jack Ryan character as a reason to read more of his writings), also fall into the "character-driven" description of a prime factor of a writing? This question is for you too Tess.
            
            For instance, Clancy's late-life writings have mostly been co-authored, and many of the primary characters of his early writings are absent. And I miss them. Those reads are not quite as satisfying for me.
            
            I am thinking that a description of character-driven being only that of following a character's development as being too narrow.
            
            GA

            replyreport
            1. 87

               Marisa Wrightposted 8 years agoin reply to this

               There is a big difference between having important characters in a novel, and having the novel being character-driven.
               
               For instance, I adore Donna Leon's crime novels set in Venice.  They are accounts of the cases of Inspector Brunetti.  So in that sense, without Brunetti there is no novel. I have read some of Leon's books without Brunetti, and I don't like them.   BUT Brunetti's wants and needs and "journey" don't drive the plot.  What drives the plot is the crime and the need to solve it.  So those novels are not character-driven.
               
               As for Romance - yes, that's a very particular genre of novel which is hugely popular with female readers.   I don't like it much myself, I find it too overblown and it irritates me that its rules are so rigid.  Harlequin is the biggest publisher. I've written a couple of Hubs on the genre if you're interested to know more.

               replyreport
      2. 0

         TessSchlesingerposted 8 years agoin reply to this

         GDPR Deleted
         1. 86

            GA Andersonposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Hello Tess, and there you have the reason I took the hedge of a qualifying "maybe." From your response, I am not sure I addressed your point correctly.
            
            Understand that I am shooting from the hip, and not offering a profound thought.
            
            I know Clancy's books are plot driven, and yes, the theme of his plots is one I enjoy reading. But, I have been disappointed when characters I consider necessary to maintain the lure of his plots, (at least for me), are missing.
            
            I understand the point of your Jack Ryan example; so no, I did not mean to come down on the side of character-driven plots - even if it sounded that way. Reads that would fit your explanation of character-driven; as in the journey involves some mountain to climb or defect to overcome, don't generally appeal to me.
            
            As to your "trilogy" and other examples - I do agree. I would enjoy a trilogy ending that completed the plot, but left a door open. On the other hand, and like you, I wouldn't bother with further readings if the ending left me hanging and unfulfilled.
            
            So, let the emails fly!
            
            GA

            replyreport
            1. 0

               TessSchlesingerposted 8 years agoin reply to this

               GDPR Deleted
               1. 87

                  Marisa Wrightposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  I just read a book which engendered the same frustration but for slightly different reasons.   It was State of Wonder by Ann Patchett.   
                  
                  A researcher dies mysteriously on a research project in the Amazon and one of his colleagues is sent to find out what happened. It turns out he's not dead after all - which was no surprise to me, I'd been waiting for that discovery since the second chapter - and he is eventually returned to his family. So you'd think this book falls into the category where everything is resolved at the end.  But no - because the protagonist isn't the missing researcher, he's absent for most of the book.  The protagonist is the colleague sent to find him, and her story isn't resolved at all. She's one of those characters with all kinds of issues at the start of the book, and you assume the book is going to be about her "journey" - but we're left at the end of the book with her seemingly having learned nothing from her ordeal, and with no idea what she might or might not do next.

                  replyreport