Do you continue to read a book even if you don't like it?
Or do you just abandon it and start a new book?
To be frank, I find it very hard to continue reading a book that I do not find interesting. Sometimes the book is by a famous author, or it has received very positive reviews - If I don't enjoy the first two chapters, I put it down without any guilt. After all, there are many more books that would captivate me from cover to cover so why not seek them out?
This ofcourse would not apply if you have to do an exam on the book. One particular book I remember is 'Tess of the D'urbervilles' in high school which was on of the six literature books - It was not a thriller but I had to read it many times to pass the examinations. I would not torture myself with a boring book.
Yes I do.
I always finish the book I start. (although It happens that I start a book, and then wait for months before going back and finishing it).
It doesn't really make much sense to do that, but I don't like unfinished books, so even if I hate a book I'll still finish it.
No I don't. Life's too short and there are lots of books out there that I could be enjoying instead, so I pass it on to someone else.
No I don't and I cant rather I could start another book and enjoy it.
It is even hard for me to finish a hub I don't like! However, not that I am working on my first book and I see how hard it is, I found that I am a bit more torrent than I use to be!
Usually I hate giving up on a book because I like to finish anything I start reading. I think only three times though have I stopped reading a book I had started; one had way too many characters crammed into it and I couldn't keep up already in the beginning, the other just wasn't interesting in the least, and The DaVinci Code...I just hated how Dan Brown wrote his books and I couldn't push myself anymore. I have to at least be a little interested to get through a book.
I've quit reading two books in the past (with the understanding that I would revisit them later) because they did not interest me. It's also funny, because they were not long books at all. In both cases I did go back and finish them after reading several other books that I really enjoyed. The two books I quit on were James Joyce's Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man and Herman Melville's Billy Budd. Portait was tiresome for me, because I don't enjoy autobiographical fiction. Billy Budd was poorly written. The subject and themes were interesting, but I still didn't enjoy it (probably because it was never really completed properly).
When reading a new author's book, I go to the book store, pull out the novel and read the first chapter. This qualifies for ANY book. Psychology, criminal justice, cooking, science fiction, romance, etc. If I don't like the first chapter, I put it back.
When I first started seriously reading, I would force myself to finish a book I didn't like. Part of the reason I did that is because there are a lot of books that people agree are worth reading, even if it's kind of a chore. A great example is Shakespeare. It's not a light afternoon read, but it's worth reading. Two books in particular; the Silmarillion and A Game of Thrones, would never have found a spot in my heart if I hadn't pushed passed initial boredom. So, I do think there is a good reason to give a book a chance; not all of them are going to grab you in the first few chapters. However, I do find that, as I get older, I'm less willing to push through books I'm not enjoying. Before, I would get to the end, but now I just push a few chapters past the point I lost interest. If it doesn't pick up, then I just set the book down.
No, but I used to. I now have a 25 page tolerance. After that, no deal. There is an exception. If I bought the book, I persevere. But those are generally non-fiction. I like checking out the first sentence of fiction books. That first sentence, and first paragraph, are usually the ones that the author sweat blood over.
I don't usually judge a book by its cover (but sometimes the quality of paper, the way the pages are cut, the binding...) but I do love that first paragraph test.
Never! Life is too short, and there are too many good books to read, so why persevere with one that you are not enjoying? You don't owe the author anything!
I have to admit, any book that can't keep my attention gets dumped and replaced. There is just too little time to waste it on something you're not enjoying!
I used to try and finish books, but as I have collected more books than I could ever hope to read in my lifetime, I have a good try, and if I really feel I'm not progressing fast enough (e.g. I've forgotten who the characters are each time I go back to the book), then I do somewhat reluctantly give up.
I have recently stopped reading Hard Times and also Life of Pi after getting half way through each of them because, although I was enjoying the style and writing, it was clear to me that there were other books I wanted to read more and, being quite difficult books, they were too time-consuming. I got stuck on Nietsche as well - that one was hellish.
I will read the first couple of chapters to give it a chance, but then abandon it forever if it is still a chore to keep reading.
by Janis Goad 6 years ago
Do you prefer reading books in paper or e-reader form, like Kindle or Kobo, and why?
by Susan Holland 7 years ago
Do you enjoy reading books or would you rather read from a computer screen and/or e-reader?Are books going out of style?
by Tim Mitchell 4 years ago
Do you read every fiction book you begin?Or, only those that come alive with the imagination?Or, only those that can be read in one sitting / day?Or, . . . ?
by Danette Watt 7 years ago
Not all books are worth reading. Do you agree with that?I heard this statement on NPR today and tried to think of a book that wasn't worth reading. I came up with a couple such as "Mein Kamp" but just because we don't agree with the ideas in the book, does that mean we shouldn't read it,...
by Crazdwriter 9 years ago
I myself am reading more than one book lol. I know I hsouldj sut stick to one book but hey like my thinking and writing I jump around a lot.I am currently reading four books and one magazine.The magazine is Alfred Hitchcock Mystery magazine September 2009the books areThe latest Harry Potter though...
by Chasuk 6 years ago
I have friends who tell me that they have "read" a book, when they have actually listened to it. This blurring of the lines bothers me; I consider reading a book and listening to it as two entirely different acts. Does this bother anyone else?Note: I am _not_ denigrating audiobooks....
Copyright © 2019 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|