Are more and more taxes and bigger government good for your country or only for politicians?
I might get slammed for this but I honestly wouldn't care if our government was bigger and taxes were higher if I trusted how they were being used. If big government provided real, good, and fair healthcare options, spent more on education than prison, etc...I don't think many would care. Problem is, we all know it's not happening that way and don't have this trust.
So, I suppose though we benefit some, the taxes are better for the politicians than anyone else.
Right now taxes are lower than they were 25 years ago and yet many people do not feel the country is better off. In fact in the U.S. we are increasing the number of millionaires/billionaires yearly and they're younger! Interest rates are low. Wall street is at an all time high!
There is a psychological component which determines how people feel about the government and economy. Today even those with jobs and making a decent living do not (feel) good about the economy. It's a "catch 22". When consumers hold onto their money out of fear they stop buying products and manufactures start laying off people which makes consumers more uneasy about their own jobs so they tighten their belts even more. We won't see dramatic improvement in the economy until people (feel) positive about the future again.
Out sourcing manufacturing and phone customer service/support jobs to other countries along with a few bad trade agreements have probably hurt the economy far more than any tax increase. It also didn't help us to be fighting 2 wars costing over a trillion dollars for the past 10 years either. We owe China a ton of money!
It all depends on what the government is doing. If the added taxes and larger agencies are working to help the citizens, then the government is doing what it's supposed to. If the money is going to shady places and big agencies do nothing for the public, then we should start being concerned. It's easy to adopt the stance that taxes and big government are bad, but that viewpoint represents a misunderstanding of what government is there for. It is a vessel of safety, change and unity. If we demonize it, and treat it as our enemy, then we aren't using it to solve our problems. In a democracy, we only have ourselves to blame for bad politicians.
There is no benefit in gov't providing services beyond that which can only be provided by gov't as an essential service. Law enforcement, courts of law...etc. In every area in which gov't has actively involved itself in the marketplace, the result is always the same. Prices go up...quality and/or accessibility go down. The gov't has been distorting prices in the healthcare sector since 1965, and we have received exactly this result. The same can be said for education.
The tax argument is a totally different discussion. Taxes and actual revenue to the gov't are in no way related. When there are higher taxes the gov't collects the same percentage of revenue as it does when there are lower taxes. The size and scope of gov't is really not driven by tax rates or the number of new taxes created. When the highest marginal rates were over 90%, the gov't collected the same share of GDP in tax revenue as they did when rates were at 28%. The higher tax rates seen in the 40's and 50's were essentially a myth. Nobody actually paid those rates of 90% because there were countless ways in the tax code to avoid them. Signing up for money losing schemes on paper was an accounting art form at that time. The tax reform of the 80's lowered rates and simplified the tax code to eliminate many of these tax loopholes to simply create a somewhat more efficient system. But the net revenue collected as a % of the size of the economy did not change much.
The expansion of gov't tends to be driven by political salesman and the selling of new services of gov't which virtually always do more harm than good. There is a very big misconception about how tax rates impact gov't. Tax rates and the complexity behind the tax code has more of an impact on the activity within the private sector...which in turn can and does impact GDP. But no matter what rates have been since the end of WW2 the US treasury has collected about 15-20% of GDP. The size of gov't and the corresponding spending to fund gov't operations is not limited to the revenue collected by the gov't. The private sector creates wealth, and the public sector creates currency. The only way for currency to increase on a net basis, is for gov't to spend more than it takes in. This is how our monetary system grows. The concern is when the actual services provided by gov't crowd out private activity and limit the creation of wealth, which hinders productivity and is potentially inflationary.
by Kathryn L Hill 5 years ago
-today in the Forums, it was stated that socialism offers freedom and low taxes. This is what we have learned today, 3/9/13 from advocates of Social Democracy for the United States (A Social Democracy promotes a gradual and peaceful transition to socialism, according to Wikipedia) Is this true?Can...
by ptosis 10 months ago
yea or nea? Are you HAPPY! that the richest .01% get less taxes? I mean - they did earn it didn't they?Do they just work harder? Is everybody else just stupid and lazy? Hard work will only get you so far if circumstances aren’t amenable. Do you believe that “If you’re still poor at 35, you...
by Grace Marguerite Williams 12 months ago
Do you feel that you are taxed too much? Are you for less taxes? Do you also feel that the government use taxes as a subterfuge for their oftentimes wasteful spending?
by kerryg 7 years ago
Republicans have repeated the lie that tax cuts are always good for the economy so often that all of Washington seems absolutely convinced that it's true. The conventional wisdom is so established on this that all a Republican has to say is, "Everyone knows you don't raise taxes in the middle...
by Barefootfae 5 years ago
Here comes carbon taxation.Maybe we will have to wear masks to measure the carbon dioxide we exhale.http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-0 … -says.html
by Josak 5 years ago
One of the greatest criticisms leveled at socialist and perceived socialist nations is their high taxes, usually reinforced with the example of France and it's high tax rates under a newly elected socialist government.Let's examine that claim factually, a quick analysis will prove it false.For...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|