|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
Why does the IRS tax people living below Federal Poverty Levels? Insane immoral tax structure?
Single, no dependents = Less than $9,225 pays 10 percent of taxable income (2017) FPL = $11,880 (2016). ETIC not available to a single, no dependents. Why are people living below FPL being taxed at all? I would think that a SPNK below FPL should have 0% IRS tax (other than UI & SS that is part of FICA). IRS audit $10/hr single Mom/2 kids because 'nobody can live in Seattle like that for less than$36k - irs-goes-after-mothe
The fed Income Tax is discriminatory and it should violate the Equal Protection Clause. It is not the 16th Amendment that can be deemed unconstitutional, because it is an amendment.
But, the application of that amendment into the USC and the resultant Internal Revenue Code can be unconstitutionally applied.
The 1986 Tax Reform Act also was damaging to the middle class, as well as those in poverty. This is because it took away tax deductions that both classes had used over the years to at least protected some of their money from being taxed. A tax deduc is not like a tax credit, but it helped in paying for their cost of going to work, and reducing their total taxes.
While, people think that the rich are being heavily taxed because of their higher marginal tax rate, they have the advantage of being able to skillfully use the Internal Rev Code to significantly reduce, defer, or even eliminate their tax obligation. In addition, most of the rich are not wage earners, and they make significant income from capital gains, which is only 20%.
Many of the rich hold significant wealth in stocks and until those stocks are sold there is no tax being paid. Yet, they can control stocks and their profits because of it. They also have the ability to wrap their wealth into trust funds and numerous other business wrappings.
Something that the middle and lower tax class can't do.
FICA is a Tax that both of these classes will probably not get any benefit for 50 or more years. The rich don't need any benefits from FICA, and even when they pay it, their total income makes these tax deductions negligible. But for the lower tax people, these are significant amounts out of their check.
A national sales tax like those state sales tax would be beneficial and less discriminatory, as the items of necessity can be excluded. And with the day of the computer and coupon cashing manipulation, these exclusions are easily programmed into the system.
A national flat tax still leaves the IRS and IRC in place.
Even though the codified Income Tax laws should be held unconstitutional as applied, the SCOTUS has refused any attack on it, and there have been many over the years.
So the current Income Tax system hurts the low, and middle class while favoring the rich who can easily use the IRC. And claims that the 1% pay 90% of the taxes while sort of true, doesn't factor in how much they are not paying on their total wealth.
by Money Fairy4 years ago
With the average of 50% of Americans living below poverty, is there any chance of recovery or will we as a society keep ignoring it and just hoping it goes away?
by TSAD2 years ago
Should we "End the IRS Before It Ends Us"? Can you find one reason not to end the IRS?The book, End the IRS Before It Ends Us, is not about taxation. It is about liberty. Grover Norquist, the head...
by patful4 months ago
You can have dinner with 3 famous people (living or dead). Who are your choices and why?
by Nickny799 years ago
Issue: Why raising taxes on corporations is BAD economics and does NOT serve any social justice:1. when gov't raises taxes on corps., corps. don't pay more money, CONSUMERS do with increased prices that...
by safiq ali patel5 years ago
From January 1st 2013 Taxes in the United States of America go upwards. People in the United States of America will pay higher taxes from this day. What is your opinion of these Tax Rises?
by Alex J. Reissig5 years ago
Would you support a flat 15% income tax?Would you support a flat 15% income tax in this country? Other than a personal deduction (possibly in the neighborhood of 25k per individual/50k per couple) there would be...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.