The Democratic party pumped out a plethora of falsisms in Charlotte.
http://factcheck.org/2012/09/democratic … charlotte/
I've seen several of these false claims posted on the HP forums.
Fact Check has handed out more Pinocchios for the GOP, by far than for the Obama campaign.
The GOP is more numerous than the Obama campaign. Or did you mean than all democrats?
It's stupid to compare parties to candidates. Everyone knows Romney isn't extreme-right, but somehow the viewpoints of the extreme-right are a negative reflecting on him...
I like how the DNC is saying that it's wrong to claim the video(you belong to the government) is a reflection of them... they had nothing at all to do with it.
It doesn't matter because a good Democrat will only believe factcheck.org when they are checking the Republicans. Otherwise they must have been infiltrated by the Tea Party just to screw with the DNC, right?
Why not let "democrats" make a response before characterizing what it will be? Otherwise this is just a pointless hate-fest.
Because the response would be a lie! Democrats lie!
It's nice to see that you are here to have a constructive discussion.
There is no reason to have a constructive or even civil discussion with progressives! It always dissolves into a liberal screeching about being harmed in some way by a conservative. I would much rather call them out on their lies.
Here are their pieces on the RNC in Tampa:
http://factcheck.org/2012/08/republican … rom-tampa/
There are other ones, just go to their website and search "Republican Tampa"
I find this whole thing fascinating in that each side of this argument believes the other to be without fault.
These guy are politicians. They are taught to lie before they are allowed before the press or a microphone.
I don't care which party, they are both full of male bovine fecal matter.
I probably would have said it differently, but, yes, after reading this thread, I wondered if anyone forgot we're talking about politicians.
I usually check Politifact if I want to check something. The Pants on Fire section is always interesting to read.
I mean to me it's amazing to watch.
Are one parties lies supposed to carry less weight than the other party?
Does one party actually think we won't know their guys are lying when it is pretty obvious?
Does the other party not realize I am also speaking about THEM?
I posted this once before in a hub but it is so on target:
Yeah, pretty much that.
Although there are good guys in both groups, and worse guys in both groups.
Well it gets really tiresome this daily grind of supposedly one group wears white and shines in the sunlight and the other eats dead burnt babies.
It's all from a horses rear end and it's not how we should be deciding who leads us.
by Ed Fisher 9 days ago
We could expect a normal swing to the left in Nov. , Is activist meltdown going to cost dems the Nov power shift ?You're ALL trying to act like the party in power ?
by Mike Russo 2 weeks ago
What was the purpose of that hearing? In my opinion it was a dog and pony show that served no purpose and had no mission statement. It proved absolutely nothing. However it did give those who are worried about the mid-terms something to ponder. The judge is a shoe-in to be...
by American View 5 years ago
Republicans have been claiming James Carville is nuts for years now. Are they right or is what James Carville said right? He is what he said:“Ideologies aren't all that important. What's important is psychology. The Democratic constituency is just like a herd of cows. All you have to do is lay...
by Charles James 6 years ago
I am not an American, but what goes on in the USA is important to the world.Lincoln was a Republican and freed the slaves. One would expect black Americans to generally vote Republican. But they don't.How did this come about?
by ahorseback 6 weeks ago
It's always interesting and educational to get one more lesson in true-shake your head- hypocrisy with Democrats and their Adopt --a --Hero campaign , already with the death of Sen.John McCain they have postured , I say postured because it so fits democratic ideology , towards McCain as...
by Audrey Selig 3 years ago
Do you think Mitt Romney could beat Hilary Clinton for president in next election? Explain.Romney may try another run at presidency.
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc. HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|