Well... that's awkward.

Jump to Last Post 1-3 of 3 discussions (20 posts)
  1. profile image0
    JaxsonRaineposted 8 years ago

    *Disclaimer* I just saw this posted, haven't read it, passing it along anyway.

    http://www.nbcnews.com/id/49528284/#.UIdUK4ZAo6M

    1. habee profile image92
      habeeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      I think something's wrong with my computer - it says this report is on NBC. Are they turning on the POTUS?

      1. profile image0
        JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        The first report I saw was on Fox, but I wasn't going to post that. I think they were covering it on MSNBC on the telly.

        Any thoughts habee?

        I honestly don't understand this whole situation. The next day Obama mentions attacks on religion, and acts of terror. For two weeks, his administration talks about these videos. On Sept 25, Obama stood before the UN and said these attacks were because of the video...

        "There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."

        As he said in the final debate... as POTUS, you have to be clear.

        1. habee profile image92
          habeeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          It confuses me, too, Jax. It looks like a coverup, but I'm trying to give the prez the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he wasn't told the whole story. Maybe his staff didn't want to upset him right before the election. Maybe they didn't want to say anything until they were absolutely sure of what was happening. I do think, however, it looks bad for Obama to have missed security briefings. I read somewhere that someone (White House, CIA, State Dept?) was watching the event in real time. Do you know anything about that?

          1. profile image0
            JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            There was a drone, assigned I believe, to the attack, which was transmitting video for most of the attack. Dunno, seems only right-wing news sites wrote about it.

            That's another point I'm confused on. I've heard it lasted anywhere between 2 and 7 hours...

            1. habee profile image92
              habeeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

              Sorta OT, but what do you think Romney's chances are? I still think O will pull it out because of Ohio.

              1. profile image0
                JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                Lol, posted at other thread.

                My 'be cautious' side is putting it at

                Romney +5% popular vote, 283 vs 255 EC vote.

                My honest-to-goodness prediction is ~9% popular vote, 311-227.


                I've detailed my thoughts on this before on other boards, but I'd probably be called a racist if I did that here smile

                1. habee profile image92
                  habeeposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                  Do you think R will win Ohio - or make gains in other (unexpected) paths?

                  1. profile image0
                    JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                    Honesty: http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_p … ?mapid=Qfg

                    Conservative: http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_p … ?mapid=Qfm

                    On the conservative map, I would have switched Iowa and Ohio, but I like to show that Romney can actually, realistically win without it.

                    Nevada looks worse in the polls than it is, because Johnson is taking away about 3% from Obama, but that's not what they are reporting.

                  2. Josak profile image60
                    Josakposted 8 years agoin reply to this

                    I like this it's the averaging of all the major polls

                    Here is the popular vote. Romney Ahead by 0.9% today.
                    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … -1171.html

                    And this is the electoral college Obama ahead 281 to 257
                    http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … anges.html

    2. Josak profile image60
      Josakposted 8 years agoin reply to this

      A group claiming responsibility is not in any way definitive groups falsely claim responsibility all the time, it takes time to figure out what actually happened.

      1. profile image0
        JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

        So, there is an attack.  Pretty much immediately, a known organization takes credit for it.

        So, the rational thing to do, is spend the next two weeks calling it a spontaneous protest to a video?

        "Our only evidence is X. However, since we aren't sure that X is correct, we'll just say it is Y, for which there is no evidence"

        1. Josak profile image60
          Josakposted 8 years agoin reply to this

          *sigh* You used to be so interesting. Obviously there were other reports indicating Y and the Whitehouse feeling that people needed answers went with the one that was on balance most likely. The thing people are ignoring is it makes absolutely no sense for this to be a cover up, it was still ages until the election and the whole story would come out sooner or later with negative consequences for backing the wrong story. So there is no reason to lie, the logical conclusion is they got bad data and went with the data they had available.

          But there is a sad lack of reason or logic in the political debate.

          1. profile image0
            JaxsonRaineposted 8 years agoin reply to this

            Ok, let's see data, intel, or reasoning for why they called it spontaneous.

            For fun, go look at the briefing given, where they state that it was clear this was planned.

            My best guess is that Obama jumped on this as an opportunity to appear sympathetic to Islam.

  2. Repairguy47 profile image61
    Repairguy47posted 8 years ago

    Not that hard to figure out, if NBC is telling the truth its because they see the handwriting on the wall. The don't want to be seen as protecting him. If he was up in the polls they wouldn't say a thing and berate FOX news for reporting it.

  3. movingout profile image60
    movingoutposted 8 years ago

    What has this country become? People want to know of another's death before a family member? Too much news too quick in my opinion. Oh, that's right, they want to know if it was a terrorist attack! Baloney, nothing more then political bs! If your loved one had been killed, would you want it all over the national news and internet before you were notified? I hope not! There was a time when the American people were notified of an incident after all information was gathered. Too much information, too fast in my opinion! This is all about ALL the news shows wanting the BEST RATINGS!

 
working

This website uses cookies

As a user in the EEA, your approval is needed on a few things. To provide a better website experience, hubpages.com uses cookies (and other similar technologies) and may collect, process, and share personal data. Please choose which areas of our service you consent to our doing so.

For more information on managing or withdrawing consents and how we handle data, visit our Privacy Policy at: https://corp.maven.io/privacy-policy

Show Details
Necessary
HubPages Device IDThis is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.
LoginThis is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.
Google RecaptchaThis is used to prevent bots and spam. (Privacy Policy)
AkismetThis is used to detect comment spam. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide data on traffic to our website, all personally identifyable data is anonymized. (Privacy Policy)
HubPages Traffic PixelThis is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.
Amazon Web ServicesThis is a cloud services platform that we used to host our service. (Privacy Policy)
CloudflareThis is a cloud CDN service that we use to efficiently deliver files required for our service to operate such as javascript, cascading style sheets, images, and videos. (Privacy Policy)
Google Hosted LibrariesJavascript software libraries such as jQuery are loaded at endpoints on the googleapis.com or gstatic.com domains, for performance and efficiency reasons. (Privacy Policy)
Features
Google Custom SearchThis is feature allows you to search the site. (Privacy Policy)
Google MapsSome articles have Google Maps embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
Google ChartsThis is used to display charts and graphs on articles and the author center. (Privacy Policy)
Google AdSense Host APIThis service allows you to sign up for or associate a Google AdSense account with HubPages, so that you can earn money from ads on your articles. No data is shared unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Google YouTubeSome articles have YouTube videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
VimeoSome articles have Vimeo videos embedded in them. (Privacy Policy)
PaypalThis is used for a registered author who enrolls in the HubPages Earnings program and requests to be paid via PayPal. No data is shared with Paypal unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook LoginYou can use this to streamline signing up for, or signing in to your Hubpages account. No data is shared with Facebook unless you engage with this feature. (Privacy Policy)
MavenThis supports the Maven widget and search functionality. (Privacy Policy)
Marketing
Google AdSenseThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Google DoubleClickGoogle provides ad serving technology and runs an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Index ExchangeThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
SovrnThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Facebook AdsThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Unified Ad MarketplaceThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
AppNexusThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
OpenxThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Rubicon ProjectThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
TripleLiftThis is an ad network. (Privacy Policy)
Say MediaWe partner with Say Media to deliver ad campaigns on our sites. (Privacy Policy)
Remarketing PixelsWe may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.
Conversion Tracking PixelsWe may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.
Statistics
Author Google AnalyticsThis is used to provide traffic data and reports to the authors of articles on the HubPages Service. (Privacy Policy)
ComscoreComScore is a media measurement and analytics company providing marketing data and analytics to enterprises, media and advertising agencies, and publishers. Non-consent will result in ComScore only processing obfuscated personal data. (Privacy Policy)
Amazon Tracking PixelSome articles display amazon products as part of the Amazon Affiliate program, this pixel provides traffic statistics for those products (Privacy Policy)
ClickscoThis is a data management platform studying reader behavior (Privacy Policy)