*Disclaimer* I just saw this posted, haven't read it, passing it along anyway.
I think something's wrong with my computer - it says this report is on NBC. Are they turning on the POTUS?
The first report I saw was on Fox, but I wasn't going to post that. I think they were covering it on MSNBC on the telly.
Any thoughts habee?
I honestly don't understand this whole situation. The next day Obama mentions attacks on religion, and acts of terror. For two weeks, his administration talks about these videos. On Sept 25, Obama stood before the UN and said these attacks were because of the video...
"There is no video that justifies an attack on an Embassy."
As he said in the final debate... as POTUS, you have to be clear.
It confuses me, too, Jax. It looks like a coverup, but I'm trying to give the prez the benefit of the doubt. Maybe he wasn't told the whole story. Maybe his staff didn't want to upset him right before the election. Maybe they didn't want to say anything until they were absolutely sure of what was happening. I do think, however, it looks bad for Obama to have missed security briefings. I read somewhere that someone (White House, CIA, State Dept?) was watching the event in real time. Do you know anything about that?
There was a drone, assigned I believe, to the attack, which was transmitting video for most of the attack. Dunno, seems only right-wing news sites wrote about it.
That's another point I'm confused on. I've heard it lasted anywhere between 2 and 7 hours...
Sorta OT, but what do you think Romney's chances are? I still think O will pull it out because of Ohio.
Lol, posted at other thread.
My 'be cautious' side is putting it at
Romney +5% popular vote, 283 vs 255 EC vote.
My honest-to-goodness prediction is ~9% popular vote, 311-227.
I've detailed my thoughts on this before on other boards, but I'd probably be called a racist if I did that here
Do you think R will win Ohio - or make gains in other (unexpected) paths?
Honesty: http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_p … ?mapid=Qfg
Conservative: http://www.270towin.com/2012_election_p … ?mapid=Qfm
On the conservative map, I would have switched Iowa and Ohio, but I like to show that Romney can actually, realistically win without it.
Nevada looks worse in the polls than it is, because Johnson is taking away about 3% from Obama, but that's not what they are reporting.
You don't think Johnson will take votes from Romney? I do.
Rassmussen got something like this from polling
Obama - 48
Romney - 45
With Johnson included
Obama - 45
Romney - 45
Johnson - 3
I don't know what it will be like in other states. Rassmussen's new NV poll today has
Obama - 48
Romney - 50
There are libertarians on both sides... the difference I think is that left-leaning Ls don't like Obama, and they don't like Romney. Right-leaning libs don't like Romney either, but they hate Obama, so they are more likely to vote the lesser of two evils.
I like this it's the averaging of all the major polls
Here is the popular vote. Romney Ahead by 0.9% today.
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … -1171.html
And this is the electoral college Obama ahead 281 to 257
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls … anges.html
Just averaging the polls is a pretty bad idea, there are good polls and bad polls.
On top of that, they only report the Obama/Romney portion of the polls. So Rassmussen has NV with Obama up by 3, but when they include Johnson in the polling, it's a dead heat.
A group claiming responsibility is not in any way definitive groups falsely claim responsibility all the time, it takes time to figure out what actually happened.
So, there is an attack. Pretty much immediately, a known organization takes credit for it.
So, the rational thing to do, is spend the next two weeks calling it a spontaneous protest to a video?
"Our only evidence is X. However, since we aren't sure that X is correct, we'll just say it is Y, for which there is no evidence"
*sigh* You used to be so interesting. Obviously there were other reports indicating Y and the Whitehouse feeling that people needed answers went with the one that was on balance most likely. The thing people are ignoring is it makes absolutely no sense for this to be a cover up, it was still ages until the election and the whole story would come out sooner or later with negative consequences for backing the wrong story. So there is no reason to lie, the logical conclusion is they got bad data and went with the data they had available.
But there is a sad lack of reason or logic in the political debate.
Ok, let's see data, intel, or reasoning for why they called it spontaneous.
For fun, go look at the briefing given, where they state that it was clear this was planned.
My best guess is that Obama jumped on this as an opportunity to appear sympathetic to Islam.
Not that hard to figure out, if NBC is telling the truth its because they see the handwriting on the wall. The don't want to be seen as protecting him. If he was up in the polls they wouldn't say a thing and berate FOX news for reporting it.
What has this country become? People want to know of another's death before a family member? Too much news too quick in my opinion. Oh, that's right, they want to know if it was a terrorist attack! Baloney, nothing more then political bs! If your loved one had been killed, would you want it all over the national news and internet before you were notified? I hope not! There was a time when the American people were notified of an incident after all information was gathered. Too much information, too fast in my opinion! This is all about ALL the news shows wanting the BEST RATINGS!
by Susan Reid 8 years ago
Word of the day seems to be MANDATE.As it, Obama's winning of a second term does not constitute a MANDATE.What does that mean?Does Obama have a mandate?Or does he not have a mandate?
by The Logician 8 years ago
What will the election results be?OK, let's see who has the real crystal ball (or is just a good guesser?)Who will win the popular vote and by how much?Who will win the electoral vote and by how much?Will there be legal challenges to whoever wins?Will there be riots?Give us the scenario you see...
by Josak 8 years ago
Rasmussen has a tie, Fox has a tie, Pew has a tie, ABC/Washington Post have Obama ahead by 1 as do CBS.Gallup has Romney ahead by 5, National Journal has Obama ahead by 5 and they can probably both be written off as outliers and are older than the above which are fresh off the press. Polling...
by Peter Leeper 8 years ago
Who do you think will win Florida? Romney or Obama? Why?
by dagny roth 8 years ago
Is anyone else annoyed that the media isn't even discussing this? Romney has only won 18 and there are still 11 to go. They are trying to get him out before the convention but quite frankly I think he deserves more attention. His following is growing and showing that many people...
by Ralph Schwartz 4 years ago
Now that the Electoral College has confirmed Trump, can the nation start to heal and work together?The Electoral College has confirmed Donald Trump as the next President. Faithless Elector counts were 2 from Trump's totals and surprisingly 4 from Clinton's totals. Even arch-rival John...
Copyright © 2021 Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers on this website. HubPages® is a registered trademark of Maven Coalition, Inc. Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners. Maven Media Brands, LLC and respective content providers to this website may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website.
|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|