|HubPages Device ID||This is used to identify particular browsers or devices when the access the service, and is used for security reasons.|
|Login||This is necessary to sign in to the HubPages Service.|
|HubPages Traffic Pixel||This is used to collect data on traffic to articles and other pages on our site. Unless you are signed in to a HubPages account, all personally identifiable information is anonymized.|
|Remarketing Pixels||We may use remarketing pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to advertise the HubPages Service to people that have visited our sites.|
|Conversion Tracking Pixels||We may use conversion tracking pixels from advertising networks such as Google AdWords, Bing Ads, and Facebook in order to identify when an advertisement has successfully resulted in the desired action, such as signing up for the HubPages Service or publishing an article on the HubPages Service.|
http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/to … -poem.html
"Oh no, faux news!"
Actually it's sort of a tough one, by the Lemon test it's fine for #1 but #2 does the poem at a public school event advance the cause of religion? if so it's unconstitutional and I think one could make an argument that it does, #3 does it overly entangle the state with religion? Again I am pretty sure one could make an argument that it does.
In the past the phrase "under God" has been ruled unconstitutional in schools even if non compulsory so one can hardly blame the school for being careful and redacting it from the poem.
As for the first amendment fluff Fox tries to insert it's transparent bull, the Supreme Court upheld a schools right to censor and or punish non "symbolic" speech in several court cases that is just Fox being Faux.
I'm an "atheist" and I think they went too far. What are we going to move for next, the word "god" being taken out of old poetry books? LoL. This was a poem. It was a matter-of-factly statement, not her telling all the students in the class that they should bow down to God. What the hell?
This is the extreme liberal version of the nonsense that happened a couple of years back in Texas. (basically ensuring that this nation will continue to lose our standing in the intellectual world...)
I think the confusion comes from an ignorance of America's true history, the American education system has rewritten God out of our books. The courts have also created confusion about the role of religion in America by making policy decisions from the bench instead of interpreting the Constitution according to its original intent.
The courts, in order to satify certain interests have erected a wall between church and state that would have shocked the founding generation. According to the Constitution and the the founders intent, expressed in the federalist papers the separation between church and state was to be institution only. In orther words they didn't want the church leadership running the government and they didn't want the government involved in church affairs. What they wanted to avoid was a state sponsored demonination as the British and most of Europe had. In Britain you could be persecuted, imprisoned or killed for not belonging to the Anglican church.
At no time was it the intent of the founders to take religion out of the public square. The words and actions of the founding generation confirm that they actually wanted the state to encourage and promote a non sectarian Christianity.
If it was only the line "He prayed to God for peace, he prayed to God for strength,” that's the problem, then I don't see how this is a statement promoting religion. It's a statement of fact (if he did). "He prayed to his God" is not a statement for, or against, religion, unless you believe the omitting of HIS God assumes it is 'our' and 'everyone's' God. I don't. I think the school was going overboard here.
I really get tired of other atheist making us all look like idiots. I don't believe in a God, but I don't care who else does. So long as someone is not standing in front of the class demanding my children say or believe I don't care. Just another bad apple.
by Christin Sander2 years ago
Do people understand the actual meaning of separation of church and state?Do you find many don't understand that separation of church and state protects both religious institutions and the citizens? I've seen so many...
by Ben Bush5 months ago
There are many who say that, not only is the separation of Church & State not a truly legal concept, but it was never intended by God to be the true state of affairs in the United States.So, what is the separation...
by M. T. Dremer2 years ago
Does the use of "In God We Trust" on our currency violate the separation of church and state?"In God We Trust" wasn't always on U.S. currency. I believe it was put on coins in the 1860s and then...
by Grace Marguerite Williams4 years ago
Is there truly a separation of church and state"? I think not, because religious conservatives areconstantly interferring with the basic rights of Americans, particularly in terms of women's reproductive...
by Dwayne Smith3 years ago
Separation of Church and State?Separation of Church and State is a hot topic currently, but to me, the trend seems to focus on things like the Pledge of Allegiance or the Ten Commandments in public buildings, yet...
by JP Carlos6 years ago
Do you believe in the separation of church and state?Many policies and bills being passed by the government seem to encrouch on religious beliefs. Also, the church has been very active in the state's affairs (at...
Copyright © 2018 HubPages Inc. and respective owners.
Other product and company names shown may be trademarks of their respective owners.
HubPages® is a registered Service Mark of HubPages, Inc.
HubPages and Hubbers (authors) may earn revenue on this page based on affiliate relationships and advertisements with partners including Amazon, Google, and others.